| Literature DB >> 32016538 |
Yosuke Murase1,2, Yasuya Inden3, Rei Shibata1, Satoshi Yanagisawa1, Aya Fujii1, Monami Ando1, Noriaki Otake1, Masaki Takenaka1, Junya Funabiki1, Yusuke Sakamoto1, Toyoaki Murohara1.
Abstract
The dominant frequency (DF) of atrial fibrillation (AF) reflects atrial electrical activity. However, the relationship between DF measured using surface electrocardiography (ECG) and AF ablation success remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify whether the DF of surface ECG in patients with persistent AF could predict arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation. We investigated 125 patients with persistent AF who underwent catheter ablation between January 2009 and December 2016. Thirty-four patients (27%) had arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation. These patients showed a significantly high DF value in leads aVL (7.2 ± 0.7 Hz vs 6.6 ± 0.9 Hz, p < 0.001) and V1 (7.4 ± 0.8 Hz vs 6.7 ± 0.7 Hz, p < 0.001). We set the cutoff value of DF as 6.9 Hz in lead aVL (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 63%) and as 7.1 Hz in lead V1 (sensitivity, 72%; specificity, 67%). Patients with DF < 6.9 Hz in lead aVL showed a significantly higher recurrence-free rate than those with DF ≥ 6.9 Hz (88% vs 45%; p < 0.001). Patients with DF of < 7.1 Hz in lead V1 showed a significantly higher recurrence-free rate than those with DF of ≥ 7.1 (87% vs 47%; p < 0.001). Patients with a high DF in leads aVL and V1 showed a lower success rate of persistent AF ablation. The DF measured from surface ECG can be a useful marker to predict ablation success.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial arrhythmia recurrence; Catheter ablation; Dominant frequency; Persistent atrial fibrillation; Surface electrocardiography
Year: 2020 PMID: 32016538 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-020-01563-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Vessels ISSN: 0910-8327 Impact factor: 2.037