Literature DB >> 33584231

To Go or Not to Go: Degrees of Dynamic Inhibitory Control Revealed by the Function of Grip Force and Early Electrophysiological Indices.

Trung Van Nguyen1, Che-Yi Hsu1, Satish Jaiswal1,2, Neil G Muggleton1,3,4,5, Wei-Kuang Liang1,2, Chi-Hung Juan1,3,6.   

Abstract

A critical issue in executive control is how the nervous system exerts flexibility to inhibit a prepotent response and adapt to sudden changes in the environment. In this study, force measurement was used to capture "partial" unsuccessful trials that are highly relevant in extending the current understanding of motor inhibition processing. Moreover, a modified version of the stop-signal task was used to control and eliminate potential attentional capture effects from the motor inhibition index. The results illustrate that the non-canceled force and force rate increased as a function of stop-signal delay (SSD), offering new objective indices for gauging the dynamic inhibitory process. Motor response (time and force) was a function of delay in the presentation of novel/infrequent stimuli. A larger lateralized readiness potential (LRP) amplitude in go and novel stimuli indicated an influence of the novel stimuli on central motor processing. Moreover, an early N1 component reflects an index of motor inhibition in addition to the N2 component reported in previous studies. Source analysis revealed that the activation of N2 originated from inhibitory control associated areas: the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), pre-motor cortex, and primary motor cortex. Regarding partial responses, LRP and error-related negativity (ERNs) were associated with error correction processes, whereas the N2 component may indicate the functional overlap between inhibition and error correction. In sum, the present study has developed reliable and objective indices of motor inhibition by introducing force, force-rate and electrophysiological measures, further elucidating our understandings of dynamic motor inhibition and error correction.
Copyright © 2021 Nguyen, Hsu, Jaiswal, Muggleton, Liang and Juan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERM; LRP; force; inhibitory control; partial response; selective stop-signal task

Year:  2021        PMID: 33584231      PMCID: PMC7876446          DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.614978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5161            Impact factor:   3.169


  73 in total

1.  ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.

Authors:  Albert Kok; Jennifer R Ramautar; Michiel B De Ruiter; Guido P H Band; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Inhibitory effects on response force in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Ko; Toni Alsford; Jeff Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Brain stimulation improves cognitive control by modulating medial-frontal activity and preSMA-vmPFC functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jiaxin Yu; Philip Tseng; Daisy L Hung; Shih-Wei Wu; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition.

Authors:  Richard A P Roche; Hugh Garavan; John J Foxe; Shane M O'Mara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Carsten Konrad; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Medial frontal cortex motivates but does not control movement initiation in the countermanding task.

Authors:  Katherine Wilson Scangos; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  An improved method for measuring mismatch negativity using ensemble empirical mode decomposition.

Authors:  Chun-Hsien Hsu; Chia-Ying Lee; Wei-Kuang Liang
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Dissociable roles of right inferior frontal cortex and anterior insula in inhibitory control: evidence from intrinsic and task-related functional parcellation, connectivity, and response profile analyses across multiple datasets.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Srikanth Ryali; Tianwen Chen; Chiang-Shan R Li; Vinod Menon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.

Authors:  M Spronk; L M Jonkman; C Kemner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 10.  Response inhibition in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of dopaminergic medication and disease duration effects.

Authors:  Peter Manza; Matthew Amandola; Vivekanand Tatineni; Chiang-Shan R Li; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  NPJ Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2017-07-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Dynamical EEG Indices of Progressive Motor Inhibition and Error-Monitoring.

Authors:  Trung Van Nguyen; Prasad Balachandran; Neil G Muggleton; Wei-Kuang Liang; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-04-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.