Xueqiong Nie1, Yinghua Li2, Changning Li3, Jing Wu3, Li Li1. 1. Division of Surveillance and Evaluation, Chinese Center for Health Education, Beijing, China. 2. Division of Surveillance and Evaluation, Chinese Center for Health Education, Beijing, China. Electronic address: liyinghua729@sina.com.cn. 3. Chinese Center for Health Education, Beijing, China.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Health literacy is a critical determinant of health. However, the association between health literacy and outcomes among Chinese residents has not been studied using nationally representative data. This study examines the association between health literacy and self-rated health among Chinese residents based on the 2017 China Health Literacy Survey. METHODS: The 2017 China Health Literacy Survey was conducted among non-institutionalized residents aged 15-69 years from 31 provinces in China. Self-rated health was measured using a single question with a 1-5 scale. Health literacy was assessed using the Chinese Health Literacy Scale. Multilevel linear regression models examined the association between health literacy and self-rated health. Data were collected in 2017 and analyzed between 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: The final sample size was 85,384. The overall weighted mean of the self-rated health score was 4.02 (95% CI=4.00, 4.03). After adjusting for individual-, county-, and province-level covariates, Chinese residents with higher levels of health literacy were more likely to have better self-rated health (β=0.0007, SE=0.0002, p<0.001). Of 6 dimensions of health literacy, 4 (i.e., infectious diseases literacy, chronic diseases literacy, medical care literacy, and health information literacy) were associated with self-rated health. Additionally, self-rated health was associated with gender, age, education, occupation, annual household income, and chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Using nationally representative data collected in 2017, this study found that self-rated health is associated with health literacy among Chinese residents aged 15-69 years. The promotion of health literacy should be an important component of health education, patient management, and health promotion.
INTRODUCTION: Health literacy is a critical determinant of health. However, the association between health literacy and outcomes among Chinese residents has not been studied using nationally representative data. This study examines the association between health literacy and self-rated health among Chinese residents based on the 2017 China Health Literacy Survey. METHODS: The 2017 China Health Literacy Survey was conducted among non-institutionalized residents aged 15-69 years from 31 provinces in China. Self-rated health was measured using a single question with a 1-5 scale. Health literacy was assessed using the Chinese Health Literacy Scale. Multilevel linear regression models examined the association between health literacy and self-rated health. Data were collected in 2017 and analyzed between 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: The final sample size was 85,384. The overall weighted mean of the self-rated health score was 4.02 (95% CI=4.00, 4.03). After adjusting for individual-, county-, and province-level covariates, Chinese residents with higher levels of health literacy were more likely to have better self-rated health (β=0.0007, SE=0.0002, p<0.001). Of 6 dimensions of health literacy, 4 (i.e., infectious diseases literacy, chronic diseases literacy, medical care literacy, and health information literacy) were associated with self-rated health. Additionally, self-rated health was associated with gender, age, education, occupation, annual household income, and chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Using nationally representative data collected in 2017, this study found that self-rated health is associated with health literacy among Chinese residents aged 15-69 years. The promotion of health literacy should be an important component of health education, patient management, and health promotion.
Authors: Sonja S Gustafsdottir; Arun K Sigurdardottir; Lena Mårtensson; Solveig A Arnadottir Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 3.295