| Literature DB >> 33582849 |
Matti Sievert1, Florian Stelzle2, Marc Aubreville3, Sarina K Mueller4, Markus Eckstein5, Nicolai Oetter2, Andreas Maier6, Konstantinos Mantsopoulos4, Heinrich Iro4, Miguel Goncalves4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of intraoperative assessment of safe margins with confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) during oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Confocal laser endomicroscopy; Head and neck malignancies; Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; Safe surgical margins
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33582849 PMCID: PMC8486707 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06659-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 0937-4477 Impact factor: 2.503
Fig. 1a Laser scanning of the tumor. b Laser scanning of the macroscopically inconspicuous margin area in the oropharynx (*transition zone, 1–5 mm away from the tumor)
Tumor characteristics
| Case | Age (years) | Tumor stage | Location | Grade | p16 | CLE frames | Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57 | pT2 | Tonsil | > 0,5 cm | G2 | Neg | 2217 | 4 m 37 s |
| 2 | 61 | pT2 | Soft palate | > 0,5 cm | N/A | Pos | 1960 | 4 m 5 s |
| 3 | 51 | pT3 | Soft palate | > 0,5 cm | G3 | Neg | 2418 | 5 m 2 s |
| 4 | 61 | pT2 | Soft palate | > 0,5 cm | G3 | Neg | 3498 | 7 m 17 s |
| 5 | 61 | pT3 | Tonsil | > 0,5 cm | G3 | Neg | 2716 | 5 m 40 s |
N/A not applicable
Fig. 2True-positive finding. All raters identified these images as corresponding to SCC. Note the poorly defined intercellular gaps between the cells' irregularity and the intensified fluorescein leakage from the dilated capillaries. All images were taken in the transition zone on macroscopically inconspicuous mucosa
Fig. 3True-negative finding. All raters identified this image as corresponding to healthy epithelium—Note the regularity of the cell borders in a polygonal honeycomb-like pattern. All images were taken in the transition zone
Data analysis by the several reviewers
| Diagnostic Metrics | P | S1 | S2 | S3 | All |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value (95%CI) | Value (95%CI) | Value (95%CI) | Value (95%CI) | Value (95%CI) | |
| Sensitivity | 89.72% (82.35–94.76) | 95.33% (89.43–98.47) | 90.65% (83.48–95.43) | 84.11% (75.79–90.46) | 89.95% (86.71–92.63) |
| Specificity | 80.65% (68.63–89.58) | 51.61% (38.56–64.50) | 95.16% (86.50–98.99) | 87.10% (76.15–94.26) | 78.63% (73.00–83.56) |
| PPV | 88.89% (82.74–93.03) | 77.27% (72.38–81.52) | 97.00% (91.46–98.99) | 91.84% (85.43–95.57) | 87.90% (85.10–90.24) |
| NPV | 81.97% (71.93–88.96) | 86.49% (72.46–93.97) | 85.51% (76.53–91.43) | 76.06% (67.03–83.23) | 81.93% (77.22–85.85) |
| Accuracy | 86.39% (80.28–91.17) | 79.29% (72.39–85.13) | 92.31% (87.21–95.84) | 85.21% (78.94–90.19) | 85.80% (82.94–88.34) |
S surgeon, P pathologist, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value; (95% Confidence Interval)
Interobserver agreement
| Observer pair | Cohens Kappa/Fleiss-Kappa | Agreement (%) |
|---|---|---|
| S1 vs S2 | 0.45 | 75.2 |
| S1 vs S3 | 0.32 | 69.2 |
| S1 vs P | 0.44 | 76.3 |
| S2 vs S3 | 0.73 | 86.9 |
| S2 vs P | 0.78 | 89.3 |
| S3 vs P | 0.60 | 81.1 |
| S1 vs S2 vs S3 vs P | 0.60 |
Interobserver agreement for observer pairs (Cohens Kappa) and for multiple Raters (Fleiss Kappa) as well as percentual agreement
Fig. 4Mucosal mucinous cells. Note the large white cells on CLE. Both images were classified as suspicious by 50% of the rater