Literature DB >> 33581741

Detection of knee synovitis using non-contrast-enhanced qDESS compared with contrast-enhanced MRI.

Bas A de Vries1, Stephan J Breda1,2, Bragi Sveinsson3,4, Emily J McWalter5, Duncan E Meuffels2, Gabriel P Krestin1, Brian A Hargreaves6, Garry E Gold6, Edwin H G Oei7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess diagnostic accuracy of quantitative double-echo in steady-state (qDESS) MRI for detecting synovitis in knee osteoarthritis (OA).
METHODS: Patients with different degrees of radiographic knee OA were included prospectively. All underwent MRI with both qDESS and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI). A linear combination of the two qDESS images can be used to create an image that displays contrast between synovium and the synovial fluid. Synovitis on both qDESS and CE-MRI was assessed semi-quantitatively, using a whole-knee synovitis sum score, indicating no/equivocal, mild, moderate, and severe synovitis. The correlation between sum scores of qDESS and CE-MRI (reference standard) was determined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of qDESS for detecting different degrees of synovitis, with CE-MRI as reference standard.
RESULTS: In the 31 patients included, very strong correlation was found between synovitis sum scores on qDESS and CE-MRI (ρ = 0.96, p < 0.001), with high absolute agreement (0.84 (95%CI 0.14-0.95)). Mean sum score (SD) values on qDESS 5.16 (3.75) were lower than on CE-MRI 7.13 (4.66), indicating systematically underestimated synovitis severity on qDESS. For detecting mild synovitis or higher, high sensitivity and specificity were found for qDESS (1.00 (95%CI 0.80-1.00) and 0.909 (0.571-1.00), respectively). For detecting moderate synovitis or higher, sensitivity and specificity were good (0.727 (95%CI 0.393-0.927) and 1.00 (0.800-1.00), respectively).
CONCLUSION: qDESS MRI is able to, however with an underestimation, detect synovitis in patients with knee OA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Humans; Inflammation; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoarthritis; Synovitis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33581741      PMCID: PMC7881494          DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02436-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther        ISSN: 1478-6354            Impact factor:   5.156


  32 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast.

Authors:  Garry E Gold; Eric Han; Jeff Stainsby; Graham Wright; Jean Brittain; Christopher Beaulieu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Optimization of a double inversion recovery sequence for noninvasive synovium imaging of joint effusion in the knee.

Authors:  Geon-Ho Jahng; Wook Jin; Dal Mo Yang; Kyung Nam Ryu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  FADE--a new fast imaging sequence.

Authors:  T W Redpath; R A Jones
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of a Fluid-attenuated Inversion-Recovery Sequence with Fat Suppression for Assessment of Peripatellar Synovitis: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging.

Authors:  Hye Jin Yoo; Sung Hwan Hong; Hye Yeon Oh; Ja-Young Choi; Hee Dong Chae; Joong Mo Ahn; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Imaging of synovitis in osteoarthritis: current status and outlook.

Authors:  Daichi Hayashi; Frank W Roemer; Avinash Katur; David T Felson; Seoung-Oh Yang; Faris Alomran; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Simultaneous estimation of T(2) and apparent diffusion coefficient in human articular cartilage in vivo with a modified three-dimensional double echo steady state (DESS) sequence at 3 T.

Authors:  Ernesto Staroswiecki; Kristin L Granlund; Marcus T Alley; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Degree of synovitis on MRI by comprehensive whole knee semi-quantitative scoring method correlates with histologic and macroscopic features of synovial tissue inflammation in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  B J E de Lange-Brokaar; A Ioan-Facsinay; E Yusuf; A W Visser; H M Kroon; S N Andersen; L Herb-van Toorn; G J V M van Osch; A-M Zuurmond; V Stojanovic-Susulic; J L Bloem; R G H H Nelissen; T W J Huizinga; M Kloppenburg
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Rapid estimation of cartilage T2 based on double echo at steady state (DESS) with 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Goetz H Welsch; Klaus Scheffler; Tallal C Mamisch; Timothy Hughes; Steven Millington; Michael Deimling; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gadolinium-free assessment of synovitis using diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Halston J C Sandford; James W MacKay; Lauren E Watkins; Garry E Gold; Feliks Kogan; Valentina Mazzoli
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 4.478

2.  To Contrast or Not to Contrast? On the Role of Contrast Enhancement in Hand MRI Studies of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Miriam Frenken; Gesa Rübsam; Alexander Mewes; Karl Ludger Radke; Lien Li; Lena M Wilms; Sven Nebelung; Daniel B Abrar; Philipp Sewerin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11

Review 3.  Imaging of Synovial Inflammation in Osteoarthritis, From the AJR Special Series on Inflammation.

Authors:  Jacob Thoenen; James W MacKay; Halston J C Sandford; Garry E Gold; Feliks Kogan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.959

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.