Literature DB >> 33579772

Retrospective cohort study evaluating clinical, biochemical and pharmacological prognostic factors for prostate cancer progression using primary care data.

Samuel William David Merriel1, Suzanne Marie Ingle2, Margaret T May2,3, Richard M Martin2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To confirm the association of previously reported prognostic factors with future progression of localised prostate cancer using primary care data and identify new potential prognostic factors for further assessment in prognostic model development and validation.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study, employing Cox proportional hazards regression controlling for age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), and Gleason score, was stratified by diagnostic stage.
SETTING: Primary care in England. PARTICIPANTS: Males with localised prostate cancer diagnosedbetween 01/01/1987 and 31/12/2016 within the Clinical Practice ResearchDatalink database, with linked data from the National Cancer Registration andAnalysis Service and Office for National Statistics. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcome measure was prostate cancer mortality. Secondary outcome measures were all-cause mortality and commencing systemic therapy. Up-staging after diagnosis was not used as a secondary outcome owing to significant missing data.
RESULTS: 10 901 men (mean age 74.38±9.03 years) with localised prostate cancer were followed up for a mean of 14.12 (±6.36) years. 2331 (21.38%) men underwent systemic therapy and 3450 (31.65%) died, including 1250 (11.47%) from prostate cancer. Factors associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer mortality included age; high PSA; current or ex-smoker; ischaemic heart disease; high C reactive protein; high ferritin; low haemoglobin; high blood glucose and low albumin.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified several new potential prognostic factors for prostate cancer progression, as well as confirming some known prognostic factors, in an independent primary care data set. Further research is needed to develop and validate a prognostic model for prostate cancer progression. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; primary care; prostate disease

Year:  2021        PMID: 33579772      PMCID: PMC7883851          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  34 in total

1.  Predicting Prostate Cancer Progression as a Function of ETS-related Gene Status, Race, and Obesity in a Longitudinal Patient Cohort.

Authors:  Jennifer Cullen; Denise Young; Yongmei Chen; Michael Degon; James Farrell; Jason Sedarsky; Wagner Baptiste; Philip Rosen; Vladimir Tolstikov; Michael Kiebish; Jacob Kagan; Sudhir Srivastava; Huai-Ching Kuo; Joel T Moncur; Inger L Rosner; Niven Narain; Viatcheslav Akmaev; Gyorgy Petrovics; Albert Dobi; David G McLeod; Shiv Srivastava; Isabell A Sesterhenn
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-03-11

Review 2.  Do prostate cancer risk models improve the predictive accuracy of PSA screening? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  K S Louie; A Seigneurin; P Cathcart; P Sasieni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  High Norwegian prostate cancer mortality: evidence of over-reporting.

Authors:  Sven Löffeler; Adrian Halland; Harald Weedon-Fekjær; Anastasia Nikitenko; Christian Lycke Ellingsen; Erik Skaaheim Haug
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 1.612

Review 4.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

5.  Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975-2004: an ecological study.

Authors:  Simon M Collin; Richard M Martin; Chris Metcalfe; David Gunnell; Peter C Albertsen; David Neal; Freddie Hamdy; Peter Stephens; J Athene Lane; Rollo Moore; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Post-diagnostic use of beta-blockers and the risk of death in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Assayag; Michael N Pollak; Laurent Azoulay
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 7.  Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 8.  Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Karel G M Moons; Danielle A van der Windt; Jill A Hayden; Pablo Perel; Sara Schroter; Richard D Riley; Harry Hemingway; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Contemporary accuracy of death certificates for coding prostate cancer as a cause of death: Is reliance on death certification good enough? A comparison with blinded review by an independent cause of death evaluation committee.

Authors:  Emma L Turner; Chris Metcalfe; Jenny L Donovan; Sian Noble; Jonathan A C Sterne; J Athene Lane; Eleanor I Walsh; Elizabeth M Hill; Liz Down; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Steven E Oliver; Simon Evans; Peter Brindle; Naomi J Williams; Laura J Hughes; Charlotte F Davies; Siaw Yein Ng; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy; Peter Albertsen; Colette M Reid; Jon Oxley; John McFarlane; Mary C Robinson; Jan Adolfsson; Anthony Zietman; Michael Baum; Anthony Koupparis; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Predicting prostate cancer progression: protocol for a retrospective cohort study to identify prognostic factors for prostate cancer outcomes using routine primary care data.

Authors:  Samuel W D Merriel; Margaret T May; Richard M Martin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficiency of C-reactive protein in prognosis evaluation of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianhui Du; Jianhua Lan; Jingjing Xiong; Hai Yang; Xiaohan Xu; Chaolai Tang; Guohua Huang; Qiao Ying; Jian Mu; Qiyi Hu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.