Miaomiao Niu1, Liying Zhang2, Yikang Wang1, Runqi Tu1, Xiaotian Liu1, Jian Hou1, Wenqian Huo1, Zhenxing Mao1, Zhenfei Wang3, Chongjian Wang4. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, 100 Kexue Avenue, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, People's Republic of China. 2. School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China. 3. School of Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China. iezfwang@zzu.edu.cn. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, 100 Kexue Avenue, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, People's Republic of China. tjwcj2008@zzu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have developed risk models for dyslipidaemia, especially for rural populations. Furthermore, the performance of genetic factors in predicting dyslipidaemia has not been explored. The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate prediction models with and without genetic factors for dyslipidaemia in rural populations. METHODS: A total of 3596 individuals from the Henan Rural Cohort Study were included in this study. According to the ratio of 7:3, all individuals were divided into a training set and a testing set. The conventional models and conventional+GRS (genetic risk score) models were developed with Cox regression, artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting machine (GBM) classifiers in the training set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination index (IDI) were used to assess the discrimination ability of the models, and the calibration curve was used to show calibration ability in the testing set. RESULTS: Compared to the lowest quartile of GRS, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) of individuals in the highest quartile of GRS was 1.23(1.07, 1.41) in the total population. Age, family history of diabetes, physical activity, body mass index (BMI), triglycerides (TGs), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were used to develop the conventional models, and the AUCs of the Cox, ANN, RF, and GBM classifiers were 0.702(0.673, 0.729), 0.736(0.708, 0.762), 0.787 (0.762, 0.811), and 0.816(0.792, 0.839), respectively. After adding GRS, the AUCs increased by 0.005, 0.018, 0.023, and 0.015 with the Cox, ANN, RF, and GBM classifiers, respectively. The corresponding NRI and IDI were 25.6, 7.8, 14.1, and 18.1% and 2.3, 1.0, 2.5, and 1.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Genetic factors could improve the predictive ability of the dyslipidaemia risk model, suggesting that genetic information could be provided as a potential predictor to screen for clinical dyslipidaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Henan Rural Cohort Study has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Register. (Trial registration: ChiCTR-OOC-15006699 . Registered 6 July 2015 - Retrospectively registered).
BACKGROUND: Few studies have developed risk models for dyslipidaemia, especially for rural populations. Furthermore, the performance of genetic factors in predicting dyslipidaemia has not been explored. The purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate prediction models with and without genetic factors for dyslipidaemia in rural populations. METHODS: A total of 3596 individuals from the Henan Rural Cohort Study were included in this study. According to the ratio of 7:3, all individuals were divided into a training set and a testing set. The conventional models and conventional+GRS (genetic risk score) models were developed with Cox regression, artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting machine (GBM) classifiers in the training set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination index (IDI) were used to assess the discrimination ability of the models, and the calibration curve was used to show calibration ability in the testing set. RESULTS: Compared to the lowest quartile of GRS, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) of individuals in the highest quartile of GRS was 1.23(1.07, 1.41) in the total population. Age, family history of diabetes, physical activity, body mass index (BMI), triglycerides (TGs), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were used to develop the conventional models, and the AUCs of the Cox, ANN, RF, and GBM classifiers were 0.702(0.673, 0.729), 0.736(0.708, 0.762), 0.787 (0.762, 0.811), and 0.816(0.792, 0.839), respectively. After adding GRS, the AUCs increased by 0.005, 0.018, 0.023, and 0.015 with the Cox, ANN, RF, and GBM classifiers, respectively. The corresponding NRI and IDI were 25.6, 7.8, 14.1, and 18.1% and 2.3, 1.0, 2.5, and 1.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Genetic factors could improve the predictive ability of the dyslipidaemia risk model, suggesting that genetic information could be provided as a potential predictor to screen for clinical dyslipidaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Henan Rural Cohort Study has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Register. (Trial registration: ChiCTR-OOC-15006699 . Registered 6 July 2015 - Retrospectively registered).
Authors: Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sarah Lewington; Gary Whitlock; Robert Clarke; Paul Sherliker; Jonathan Emberson; Jim Halsey; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-12-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Pei Gao; Lisa Pennells; Stephen Kaptoge; Muriel Caslake; Alexander Thompson; Adam S Butterworth; Nadeem Sarwar; David Wormser; Danish Saleheen; Christie M Ballantyne; Bruce M Psaty; Johan Sundström; Paul M Ridker; Dorothea Nagel; Richard F Gillum; Ian Ford; Pierre Ducimetiere; Stefan Kiechl; Wolfgang Koenig; Robin P F Dullaart; Gerd Assmann; Ralph B D'Agostino; Gilles R Dagenais; Jackie A Cooper; Daan Kromhout; Altan Onat; Robert W Tipping; Agustín Gómez-de-la-Cámara; Annika Rosengren; Susan E Sutherland; John Gallacher; F Gerry R Fowkes; Edoardo Casiglia; Albert Hofman; Veikko Salomaa; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Robert Clarke; Eric Brunner; J Wouter Jukema; Leon A Simons; Manjinder Sandhu; Nicholas J Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Jussi Kauhanen; Jukka T Salonen; William J Howard; Børge G Nordestgaard; Angela M Wood; Simon G Thompson; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Naveed Sattar; Chris Packard; Vilmundur Gudnason; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Domingo Orozco-Beltran; Jose A Quesada; Vicente Bertomeu-Gonzalez; Jose M Lobos-Bejarano; Jorge Navarro-Perez; Vicente F Gil-Guillen; Luis Garcia Ortiz; Adriana Lopez-Pineda; Angel Castellanos-Rodriguez; Angela Lopez-Domenech; Antonio Francisco J Cardona-Llorens; Concepcion Carratala-Munuera Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 4.379