Literature DB >> 28456682

Polygenic risk score predicts prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Martine Paquette1, Michael Chong2, Sébastien Thériault3, Robert Dufour4, Guillaume Paré5, Alexis Baass6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a severe monogenic disease, it has been shown that clinical risk factors and common genetic variants can modify cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the polygenic contribution to lipid traits and CVD in FH using genetic risk scores (GRSs).
METHODS: Among the 20,434 subjects attending the lipid clinic, we identified and included 725 individuals who carried an FH causing mutation in this retrospective cohort study. We evaluated the association of GRSs for several traits including coronary artery disease (CAD; GRSCAD) as well as plasma concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; GRSLDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (GRSHDL-C) and triglycerides (GRSTG).
RESULTS: A total of 32% (n = 231) of FH subjects presented a CVD event before their first visit. Patients in the highest GRSLDL-C tertile presented an LDL-C 0.4 mmol/L (15.5 mg/dL) higher than the subjects in the lowest tertile (P = .01). The GRSCAD was strongly associated with CVD events (odds ratio 1.80; 95% confidence interval 1.14-2.85; P = .01) even after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. Compared with subjects in the first tertile, those in the third GRSCAD tertile had a significantly higher prevalence of events (40.9% vs 24.7%, P < .0001) and a significantly higher number of events (average 0.97 vs 0.57 [P = .0001] events per individual).
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that even in the context of a severe monogenic disease such as FH, common genetic variants can significantly modify the disease phenotype. The use of the 192-SNPs GRSCAD may refine CVD risk prediction in FH patients and this could lead to a more personalized approach to therapy.
Copyright © 2017 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Familial hypercholesterolemia; Genetic risk score; HDL-C; LDL-C; Risk stratification; SNP; TG

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28456682     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2017.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lipidol        ISSN: 1876-4789            Impact factor:   4.766


  25 in total

Review 1.  Polygenic Scores to Assess Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Clinical Perspectives and Basic Implications.

Authors:  Krishna G Aragam; Pradeep Natarajan
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities.

Authors:  Alicia R Martin; Masahiro Kanai; Yoichiro Kamatani; Yukinori Okada; Benjamin M Neale; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Predicting Polygenic Risk of Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Alicia R Martin; Mark J Daly; Elise B Robinson; Steven E Hyman; Benjamin M Neale
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 4.  How Genomics Is Personalizing the Management of Dyslipidemia and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Lane B Benes; Daniel J Brandt; Eric J Brandt; Michael H Davidson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Knowns and unknowns in the care of pediatric familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Andrew C Martin; Samuel S Gidding; Albert Wiegman; Gerald F Watts
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.922

6.  Usefulness of the genetic risk score to identify phenocopies in families with familial hypercholesterolemia?

Authors:  Youmna Ghaleb; Sandy Elbitar; Petra El Khoury; Eric Bruckert; Valérie Carreau; Alain Carrié; Philippe Moulin; Mathilde Di-Filippo; Sybil Charriere; Harout Iliozer; Michel Farnier; Gérald Luc; Jean-Pierre Rabès; Catherine Boileau; Marianne Abifadel; Mathilde Varret
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  Familial hypercholesterolaemia: evolving knowledge for designing adaptive models of care.

Authors:  Gerald F Watts; Samuel S Gidding; Pedro Mata; Jing Pang; David R Sullivan; Shizuya Yamashita; Frederick J Raal; Raul D Santos; Kausik K Ray
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  Precision Medicine Approaches to Vascular Disease: JACC Focus Seminar 2/5.

Authors:  Clint L Miller; Amy R Kontorovich; Ke Hao; Lijiang Ma; Conrad Iyegbe; Johan L M Björkegren; Jason C Kovacic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Polygenic risk scores: pleiotropy and the effect of environment.

Authors:  Yury Loika; Irina Irincheeva; Irina Culminskaya; Alireza Nazarian; Alexander M Kulminski
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.713

10.  Determinants of penetrance and variable expressivity in monogenic metabolic conditions across 77,184 exomes.

Authors:  Julia K Goodrich; Moriel Singer-Berk; Rachel Son; Abigail Sveden; Jordan Wood; Eleina England; Joanne B Cole; Ben Weisburd; Nick Watts; Lizz Caulkins; Peter Dornbos; Ryan Koesterer; Zachary Zappala; Haichen Zhang; Kristin A Maloney; Andy Dahl; Carlos A Aguilar-Salinas; Gil Atzmon; Francisco Barajas-Olmos; Nir Barzilai; John Blangero; Eric Boerwinkle; Lori L Bonnycastle; Erwin Bottinger; Donald W Bowden; Federico Centeno-Cruz; John C Chambers; Nathalie Chami; Edmund Chan; Juliana Chan; Ching-Yu Cheng; Yoon Shin Cho; Cecilia Contreras-Cubas; Emilio Córdova; Adolfo Correa; Ralph A DeFronzo; Ravindranath Duggirala; Josée Dupuis; Ma Eugenia Garay-Sevilla; Humberto García-Ortiz; Christian Gieger; Benjamin Glaser; Clicerio González-Villalpando; Ma Elena Gonzalez; Niels Grarup; Leif Groop; Myron Gross; Christopher Haiman; Sohee Han; Craig L Hanis; Torben Hansen; Nancy L Heard-Costa; Brian E Henderson; Juan Manuel Malacara Hernandez; Mi Yeong Hwang; Sergio Islas-Andrade; Marit E Jørgensen; Hyun Min Kang; Bong-Jo Kim; Young Jin Kim; Heikki A Koistinen; Jaspal Singh Kooner; Johanna Kuusisto; Soo-Heon Kwak; Markku Laakso; Leslie Lange; Jong-Young Lee; Juyoung Lee; Donna M Lehman; Allan Linneberg; Jianjun Liu; Ruth J F Loos; Valeriya Lyssenko; Ronald C W Ma; Angélica Martínez-Hernández; James B Meigs; Thomas Meitinger; Elvia Mendoza-Caamal; Karen L Mohlke; Andrew D Morris; Alanna C Morrison; Maggie C Y Ng; Peter M Nilsson; Christopher J O'Donnell; Lorena Orozco; Colin N A Palmer; Kyong Soo Park; Wendy S Post; Oluf Pedersen; Michael Preuss; Bruce M Psaty; Alexander P Reiner; Cristina Revilla-Monsalve; Stephen S Rich; Jerome I Rotter; Danish Saleheen; Claudia Schurmann; Xueling Sim; Rob Sladek; Kerrin S Small; Wing Yee So; Timothy D Spector; Konstantin Strauch; Tim M Strom; E Shyong Tai; Claudia H T Tam; Yik Ying Teo; Farook Thameem; Brian Tomlinson; Russell P Tracy; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Teresa Tusié-Luna; Rob M van Dam; Ramachandran S Vasan; James G Wilson; Daniel R Witte; Tien-Yin Wong; Noël P Burtt; Noah Zaitlen; Mark I McCarthy; Michael Boehnke; Toni I Pollin; Jason Flannick; Josep M Mercader; Anne O'Donnell-Luria; Samantha Baxter; Jose C Florez; Daniel G MacArthur; Miriam S Udler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 17.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.