Literature DB >> 33579247

Cleaning the palate and tongue without nausea: a mixed methods study exploring the appropriate depth and direction of oral care.

Yang Cheng1, Yu-Feng Zhou2, Ya-Ping Ding3, Ying Xing1, Enfang Shan1, Hang Sun1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is advisable to clean the palate and tongue thoroughly during oral care to protect against nosocomial infections. However, improper cleaning may cause nausea. To date, no robust data are available regarding how to implement this procedure properly. Furthermore, traditional cotton balls, forceps and normal saline are still used in clinical in China. This mixed methods study aimed to explore the appropriate depth and direction of cleaning methods for palates and tongues without causing nausea and the factors influencing cleaning depth and discomfort in traditional oral care.
METHODS: Our study recruited students (n = 276) from a medical university. The first phase was a quantitative study, in which forceps were slowly inserted into their throats until the gag reflex was triggered, and then, the insertion depth was measured. After that, participants were randomly divided into two groups. In group A, palates and tongues were cleaned coronally and then sagittally, with the converse order used for group B. The extent of nausea was measured. Additionally, the qualitative data were types of discomfort other than nausea reported by the participants.
RESULTS: The tolerable depths (without causing nausea) for cleaning the palate and tongue were 6.75 ± 1.07 cm and 6.92 ± 1.11 cm, respectively. Participants of male sex and with high BMI (overweight/obese) were associated with greater tolerable cleaning depth. The extent of nausea caused by cleaning both the palate and the tongue sagittally was higher than that elicited by coronal cleaning (p = 0.025 and p = 0.003, respectively). Other discomforts included itching, saltiness and coldness.
CONCLUSION: It is appropriate to increase the cleaning depth of the palate and tongue for adult males and overweight/obese individuals. Moreover, coronal cleaning causes lower levels of nausea, and traditional oral care appliances should be improved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-nausea; Oral care; Oral cleaning depth; Oral cleaning direction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33579247      PMCID: PMC7881663          DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01414-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Oral Health        ISSN: 1472-6831            Impact factor:   2.757


  24 in total

1.  Utility of the gagging problem assessment questionnaire in assessing patient sensitivity to dental treatments.

Authors:  Z Z Akarslan; A Z Y Biçer
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.837

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

3.  Mouth care to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Staja Booker; Sharon Murff; Lisa Kitko; Rita Jablonski
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.220

4.  Comparative evaluation of gastric pH and volume in morbidly obese and lean patients undergoing elective surgery and effect of aspiration prophylaxis.

Authors:  Vikram Mahajan; Junaid Hashmi; Rahil Singh; Tanvir Samra; Sanjeev Aneja
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 9.452

5.  The use of low-level laser therapy for controlling the gag reflex in children during intraoral radiography.

Authors:  Mesut Elbay; Önjen Tak; Ülkü Şermet Elbay; Can Kaya; Kubilay Eryılmaz
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  An earplug technique to reduce the gag reflex during dental procedures.

Authors:  Yusuf Ozgur Cakmak; Omer Ozdogmus; Yumusan Günay; Bahadır Gürbüzer; Emre Tezulaş; Elif Ciğdem Kaspar; Hüsniye Hacıoglu
Journal:  Forsch Komplementmed       Date:  2014-03-28

7.  Self-reported gagging in dentistry: prevalence, psycho-social correlates and oral health.

Authors:  C M H H van Houtem; A J van Wijk; D I Boomsma; L Ligthart; C M Visscher; A de Jongh
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.837

8.  The correlation of gagging threshold with intra-oral tactile and psychometric profiles in healthy subjects: A pilot study.

Authors:  Mi-Ju Park; Jin-Seok Byun; Jae-Kwang Jung; Jae-Kap Choi
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  Gagging and its associations with dental care-related fear, fear of pain and beliefs about treatment.

Authors:  Cameron L Randall; Grant P Shulman; Richard J Crout; Daniel W McNeil
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.634

10.  Reliability, validity, and sex differences in a quantitative gag reflex measurement method.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Karibe; Ayuko Okamoto; Yuichi Kato; Kisaki Shimazu; Greg Goddard
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.