Shilei Bi1, Lizi Zhang2, Jingsi Chen1,3,4, Minshan Huang1, Lijun Huang1, Shanshan Zeng1, Yulian Li1, Yingyu Liang1, Jinping Jia5, Suiwen Wen6, Yinli Cao7, Shaoshuai Wang8, Xiaoyan Xu8, Ling Feng8, Xianlan Zhao9, Yangyu Zhao10, Qiying Zhu11, Hongbo Qi12, Lanzhen Zhang13, Hongtian Li14, Zhijian Wang15, Lili Du16,17,18, Dunjin Chen19,20,21. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 63 Duobao Road, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Ave North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. 3. Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. 4. Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangzhou Huadu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Guangzhou, China. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xian, China. 8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. 9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. 10. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. 11. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China. 12. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 13. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 14. Institute of Reproductive and Child Health, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China. 15. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Ave North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. wzjnfyy@163.com. 16. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 63 Duobao Road, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China. lilidu8107@hotmail.com. 17. Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. lilidu8107@hotmail.com. 18. Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. lilidu8107@hotmail.com. 19. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 63 Duobao Road, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China. gzdrchen@gzhmu.edu.cn. 20. Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. gzdrchen@gzhmu.edu.cn. 21. Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. gzdrchen@gzhmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To determine the effects of maternal age at first cesarean on maternal complications and adverse outcomes of pregnancy with the second cesarean. METHODS: This was a multicenter, historical, cross-sectional cohort study involving singleton pregnancies ≥28 gestational weeks, with a history of 1 cesarean delivery, and who underwent a second cesarean between January and December 2017 at 11 public tertiary hospitals in 7 provinces of China. We analyzed the effects of maternal age at first cesarean on adverse outcomes of pregnancy in the second cesarean using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study consisted of 10,206 singleton pregnancies. Women were at first cesarean between 18 and 24, 25-29, 30-34, and ≥ 35 years of age; and numbered 2711, 5524, 1751, and 220 cases, respectively. Maternal age between 18 and 24 years at first cesarean increased the risk of placenta accreta spectrum (aOR, 1.499; 95% CI, 1.12-2.01), placenta previa (aOR, 1.349; 95% CI, 1.07-1.70), intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (aOR, 1.947; 95% CI, 1.24-3.07), postpartum hemorrhage (aOR, 1.505; 95% CI, 1.05-2.16), and blood transfusion (aOR, 1.517; 95% CI, 1.21-1.91) in the second cesarean compared with the reference group (aged 25-29 years). In addition, maternal age ≥ 35 years at first cesarean was a risk factor for premature rupture of membranes (aOR, 1.556; 95% CI, 1.08-2.24), placental abruption (aOR, 6.464, 95% CI, 1.33-31.51), uterine rupture (aOR, 7.952; 95% CI, 1.43-44.10), puerperal infection (aOR, 6.864; 95% CI, 1.95-24.22), neonatal mild asphyxia (aOR, 4.339; 95% CI, 1.53-12.32), severe asphyxia (aOR, 18.439; 95% CI, 1.54-220.95), and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (aOR, 2.825; 95% CI, 1.54-5.17) compared with the reference group (aged 25-29 years). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal age between 18 and 24 years or advanced maternal age at first cesarean was an independent risk factor for adverse maternal outcomes with the second cesarean. Advanced maternal age at the first cesarean specifically increased adverse neonatal outcomes with the second. Therefore, decisions as to whether to perform a first cesarean at a young or advanced maternal age must be critically evaluated.
BACKGROUND: To determine the effects of maternal age at first cesarean on maternal complications and adverse outcomes of pregnancy with the second cesarean. METHODS: This was a multicenter, historical, cross-sectional cohort study involving singleton pregnancies ≥28 gestational weeks, with a history of 1 cesarean delivery, and who underwent a second cesarean between January and December 2017 at 11 public tertiary hospitals in 7 provinces of China. We analyzed the effects of maternal age at first cesarean on adverse outcomes of pregnancy in the second cesarean using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study consisted of 10,206 singleton pregnancies. Women were at first cesarean between 18 and 24, 25-29, 30-34, and ≥ 35 years of age; and numbered 2711, 5524, 1751, and 220 cases, respectively. Maternal age between 18 and 24 years at first cesarean increased the risk of placenta accreta spectrum (aOR, 1.499; 95% CI, 1.12-2.01), placenta previa (aOR, 1.349; 95% CI, 1.07-1.70), intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (aOR, 1.947; 95% CI, 1.24-3.07), postpartum hemorrhage (aOR, 1.505; 95% CI, 1.05-2.16), and blood transfusion (aOR, 1.517; 95% CI, 1.21-1.91) in the second cesarean compared with the reference group (aged 25-29 years). In addition, maternal age ≥ 35 years at first cesarean was a risk factor for premature rupture of membranes (aOR, 1.556; 95% CI, 1.08-2.24), placental abruption (aOR, 6.464, 95% CI, 1.33-31.51), uterine rupture (aOR, 7.952; 95% CI, 1.43-44.10), puerperal infection (aOR, 6.864; 95% CI, 1.95-24.22), neonatal mild asphyxia (aOR, 4.339; 95% CI, 1.53-12.32), severe asphyxia (aOR, 18.439; 95% CI, 1.54-220.95), and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (aOR, 2.825; 95% CI, 1.54-5.17) compared with the reference group (aged 25-29 years). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal age between 18 and 24 years or advanced maternal age at first cesarean was an independent risk factor for adverse maternal outcomes with the second cesarean. Advanced maternal age at the first cesarean specifically increased adverse neonatal outcomes with the second. Therefore, decisions as to whether to perform a first cesarean at a young or advanced maternal age must be critically evaluated.
Authors: M Laopaiboon; P Lumbiganon; N Intarut; R Mori; T Ganchimeg; J P Vogel; J P Souza; A M Gülmezoglu Journal: BJOG Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Joep C Kortekaas; Brenda M Kazemier; Judit K J Keulen; Aafke Bruinsma; Ben W Mol; Frank Vandenbussche; Jeroen Van Dillen; Esteriek De Miranda Journal: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 3.636