Literature DB >> 24045377

Why we do caesars: a comparison of the trends in caesarean section delivery over a decade.

Candice P Y Wang1, Wei Ching Tan, Devendra Kanagalingam, Hak Koon Tan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the United Kingdom, caesarean section (CS) rates have increased from 9% of deliveries in 1980 to 21% in 2001. A similar increase in CS rates has been seen in many developed countries. This is beyond the World Health Organisation's (WHO's) recommended level of 15%. This is a worrying trend as the risks of placenta previa, placenta accreta, hysterectomies, bladder and bowel injuries are increased with subsequent CS. We aim to ascertain the commonest indications for CS in a tertiary hospital and make recommendations to decrease future CS rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis compares the 5 most common indications for CS in 1999 and 2009. CS rates in the 2 study periods are tabulated and analysed as well.
RESULTS: In the first study period between January and December 1999, there were 2048 deliveries of which 365 were via CS. In the second study period of a decade later from January to December 2009, there were 1572 deliveries of which 531 were via CS. This gives an increase in CS rate from 17.8% in 1999 to 34% in 2009. The main indications for CS in 1999 were: cephalopelvic disproportion (18.6%), breech (14.2%), non-reassuring fetal status (11.8%), 1 previous CS (11.2%) and pregnancy-induced hypertension/pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (6.6%). The main indications for CS in 2009 were: 1 previous CS (18.1%), non-reassuring fetal status (12.2%), cephalopelvic disproportion (10.5%), 2 or more previous CS (7.9%) and breech (7.7%).
CONCLUSION: There is a significant increase in CS rates over the last decade with an increased percentage of CS done because of a previous CS. This is associated with increased risk of complications as well. Recommendations are suggested with the view to decrease future CS rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24045377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singap        ISSN: 0304-4602            Impact factor:   2.473


  3 in total

Review 1.  A review of Caesarean section techniques and postoperative thromboprophylaxis at a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Chang Qi Hester Lau; Tuck Chin Tiffany Wong; Eng Loy Tan; Devendra Kanagalingam
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Maternal age at first cesarean delivery related to adverse pregnancy outcomes in a second cesarean delivery: a multicenter, historical, cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Shilei Bi; Lizi Zhang; Jingsi Chen; Minshan Huang; Lijun Huang; Shanshan Zeng; Yulian Li; Yingyu Liang; Jinping Jia; Suiwen Wen; Yinli Cao; Shaoshuai Wang; Xiaoyan Xu; Ling Feng; Xianlan Zhao; Yangyu Zhao; Qiying Zhu; Hongbo Qi; Lanzhen Zhang; Hongtian Li; Zhijian Wang; Lili Du; Dunjin Chen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China.

Authors:  Yajun Liu; Guanghui Li; Yi Chen; Xin Wang; Yan Ruan; Liying Zou; Weiyuan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.