(1) Background: The physical and psychological consequences suffered by informal caregivers have been extensively studied. MHealth solutions appear to be an opportunity to help overcome the caregiver burden. The objective of this study was to evaluate available mobile applications for informal caregivers of people who are ill and to determine whether these mobile applications were developed considering the needs of caregiver users. (2) Methods: A systematic review was carried out using the MEDLINE, ProQuest, and Scopus databases. The information about mobile applications for informal caregivers was analyzed. This review examined studies published between January 2011 and July 2020 in English. The data extracted from each paper included the development of the mobile application, if that application was assessed considering the caregivers' needs, functions of the mobile application, measures for evaluating caregivers' needs, measures for evaluating the effectiveness of the mobile application, and the main results obtained. (3) Results: Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The most common functions of the apps were summaries with information about the person they care for, educational information, resources and services for caregivers, solutions to common problems during care, and questionnaires to assess caregivers' well-being. Most of these studies assessed caregivers' needs before designing mobile applications to adapt them to the needs of their users. (4) Conclusions: Mobile applications for caregivers appear to provide solutions for them. Moreover, the effectiveness of these apps will depend largely on whether their characteristics match users' needs. Current studies have shown the poor quality of evidence.
(1) Background: The physical and psychological consequences suffered by informal caregivers have been extensively studied. MHealth solutions appear to be an opportunity to help overcome the caregiver burden. The objective of this study was to evaluate available mobile applications for informal caregivers of people who are ill and to determine whether these mobile applications were developed considering the needs of caregiver users. (2) Methods: A systematic review was carried out using the MEDLINE, ProQuest, and Scopus databases. The information about mobile applications for informal caregivers was analyzed. This review examined studies published between January 2011 and July 2020 in English. The data extracted from each paper included the development of the mobile application, if that application was assessed considering the caregivers' needs, functions of the mobile application, measures for evaluating caregivers' needs, measures for evaluating the effectiveness of the mobile application, and the main results obtained. (3) Results: Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The most common functions of the apps were summaries with information about the person they care for, educational information, resources and services for caregivers, solutions to common problems during care, and questionnaires to assess caregivers' well-being. Most of these studies assessed caregivers' needs before designing mobile applications to adapt them to the needs of their users. (4) Conclusions: Mobile applications for caregivers appear to provide solutions for them. Moreover, the effectiveness of these apps will depend largely on whether their characteristics match users' needs. Current studies have shown the poor quality of evidence.
Entities:
Keywords:
caregivers; informal caregivers; mHealth; mobile applications; telemedicine
Authors: Francine N F R Queluz; Emily Kervin; Lori Wozney; Pamela Fancey; Patrick J McGrath; Janice Keefe Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Andrés Losada; María Márquez-González; Rosa Romero-Moreno; Brent T Mausbach; Javier López; Virginia Fernández-Fernández; Celia Nogales-González Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2015-06-15
Authors: Craig F Garfield; Young Seok Lee; Hyung Nam Kim; Joshua Rutsohn; Janine Yasmin Kahn; Brian Mustanski; David C Mohr Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2016-06-04
Authors: C Eyaloba; I De Brauwer; S Cès; F Benoit; S Gillain; L Pesch; H Rouvière; S De Breucker Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Chloé Schorderet; Caroline H G Bastiaenen; Henk Verloo; Robert A de Bie; Lara Allet Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-09-19 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Nurul Syaireen A Rashid; Xin Wee Chen; Muhamad Fadhil Mohamad Marzuki; Aseel A Takshe; Ahmad Okasha; Faridah Maarof; Raudah Mohd Yunus Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Alberto Sardella; Vittorio Lenzo; Angela Alibrandi; Antonino Catalano; Francesco Corica; Maria C Quattropani; Giorgio Basile Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 3.390