| Literature DB >> 33578569 |
Hongjuan Zhao1, Liyan Wang2, Yu Wang2.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) in the let-7 family have established regulatory roles in pregnancy; in this study, we evaluated whether miRNAs detectable in the circulation are associated with the ovarian response to stimulation.In total, 25 patients with infertility were divided into 3 groups: poor response (n = 9), moderate response (n = 8), and hyper-response (n = 8). Serum and endometrial tissue samples on the second day of the menstrual phase, serum samples during the mid-luteal phase, and follicular fluid samples were collected from women undergoing in vitro fertilization. The levels of let-7g-5p, let-7f-5p, and let-7i-5p in were evaluated.The levels of circulating let-7g-5p,7f-5p, and 7i-5p in the basal sera were significantly higher in the moderate ovarian response group than in the poor response group (P < .05). The expression levels of these genes tended to be down-regulated in the mid-luteal phase in the high response group (P < .05). There were no significant differences in expression levels in the endometria and follicular fluid among groups (P > .05).Circulating let-7g-5p, 7f-5p, and 7i-5p were differentially expressed between the moderate response group and the high and poor response groups. The combination of these serum miRNAs during the menstrual phase might serve as a non-invasive predictive marker for the ovarian response to in vitro fertilization.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33578569 PMCID: PMC7886401 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Primer sequences.
| Gene | Upstream primer sequence (5’-3’) | Downstream primer sequence (5’-3’) |
| let-7g-5p | CCGCGTGAGGTAGTAGTTTGTACAGTTAAA | GTGCAGGGTCCGAGCT |
| let-7f-5p | GCGCGCTGAGGTAGTAGATTGTATAGTTAAA | GTGCAGGGTCCGAGCT |
| let-7i-5p | CGGCTGAGGTAGTAGTTTGTGCTGTTAA | GTGCAGGGTCCGAGCT |
| miR-16-5p | UAGCAGCACGUAAAUAUUGGCG | GTGCAGGGTCCGAGCT |
Comparison of demographic and clinical findings.
| Poor responder (n = 9) | Moderate responder (n = 8) | High responder (n = 8) | ||
| Age | 32.33 ± 2.60 | 31.25 ± 3.69 | 29.88 ± 3.14 | .577 |
| Gravidity | 2.22 ± 1.30 | 0.75 ± 0.89 | 1.75 ± 1.49 | .262 |
| Parity | 0.22 ± 0.44 | 0 | 0.13 ± 0.35 | .009 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.55 ± 4.02 | 21.95 ± 1.98 | 22.87 ± 2.54 | .081 |
| AFC | 4.78 ± 2.11 | 9.75 ± 4.86 | 13.38 ± 3.29 | .145 |
| Basic FSH | 8.93 ± 3.80 | 6.74 ± 1.95 | 6.03 ± 1.07 | .083 |
| Basic LH | 4.23 ± 2.17 | 5.19 ± 3.12 | 4.92 ± 1.41 | .138 |
| Basic E2 | 30.40 ± 13.45 | 44.50 ± 29.35 | 35.9 ± 27.23 | .676 |
| AMH | 2.16 ± 2.04 | 3.80 ± 1.97 | 5.72 ± 3.56 | .437 |
| Stimulation protocol | Long protocol | Long protocol | Long protocol | |
| Initial FSH stimulation dose (IU) | 3.44 ± 0.53 | 2.75 ± 0.85 | 2.31 ± 0.46 | .091 |
| Total FSH stimulation dose (IU) | 49.33 ± 16.48 | 40.94 ± 14.81 | 28.19 ± 8.23 | .241 |
| Days of stimulation | 13.33 ± 5.15 | 11.5 ± 1.31 | 10.88 ± 1.13 | .007 |
| Number of collected oocytes | 4.11 ± 1.45 | 11.88 ± 2.03 | 23 ± 7.89 | .002 |
| Number of cleavage embryos | 2.11 ± 1.05 | 6.62 ± 3.20 | 11.5 ± 4.54 | .009 |
| Endometrial thickness on embryo transfer day | 11.0 ± 1.58 | 11.13 ± 2.10 | 9.88 ± 1.13 | .06 |
| Clinical pregnancy rate | 44.54%(4/9) | 37.5%(3/8) | 87.5%(7/8) | <.001 |
AFC = antral follicle count, AMH = antimüllerian hormone, Basic = the second day of menstrual phase, BMI = body mass index, E2 = estradiol, FSH = Hormone, LH = luteinizing hormone.
Figure 1The relative expression of has-let-7g-5p in the serum during the menstrual phase and mid-luteal phase, endometria, and follicular fluid in 3 groups.
Figure 3The relative expression of has-let-7i-5p in the serum during the menstrual phase and mid-luteal phase, endometria, and follicular fluid in 3 groups.