| Literature DB >> 33575934 |
Liangzi Xu1, Mengdi Qi1,2, Chunli Ma1,2, Mengmei Yang1, Pu Huang1, Jing Sun1,3, Jiandong Shi4,5, Yunzhang Hu6,7.
Abstract
Surveillance of recombinant enterovirus 71 (EV71) and subgenotype replacement is vital for preventing and controlling hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) outbreaks. Despite this, data on recombinant variants and phylogeny of circulating EV71 strains in mainland China are limited. In this study, recombinant variants of EV71 were identified in mainland China from 2009 to 2018. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that except for individual strains (CQ2014-86/CQ/CHN/2014 and EV71/Xiamen/2009 (B5)), almost all of the EV71 strains in mainland China belonged to the subgenotype C4a. Analysing complete genome sequences of 196 EV71 isolates, 3 intertypic recombination strains (VR1432, 30-2/2015/BJ, and Guangdong-2009) and 5 intratypic recombination strains (EV71/P1034/2013, VR1432, Henan-ZMD/CHN/2012, Hubei-WH/CHN/2012, and EV71/P868/2013/China) were identified among naturally circulating EV71. The breakpoints of these recombinant strains were located within the P1, P2, and P3 encoding regions. Notably, a double recombinant (VR1432) resulting from recombination between EV71 subgenotype C4a and C4b strain SHZH98 and a CA8 strain Donovan was identified. This study reports these specific intertypic and intratypic recombination events for the first time highlighting the importance of genetic recombination in the emergence of new enterovirus variants.Entities:
Keywords: And mouth disease (HFMD); Enteroviruses 71 (EV71); Foot; Hand; Intertypic recombination; Intratypic recombination
Year: 2021 PMID: 33575934 PMCID: PMC7877514 DOI: 10.1007/s11262-021-01830-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virus Genes ISSN: 0920-8569 Impact factor: 2.332
Fig. 1The phylogenetic tree was based on complete genome sequences of 196 EV71 strains isolated from different parts of China from 2009 to 2018. Various prototypes and the oldest available EV-A strains were used as reference sequences. The phylogenetic dendrogram was constructed by the neighbor-joining method based on the maximum composition likelihood model using MEGA 7.0. The prototype CA16 G-10 strain was used as an outgroup. Bootstrap analysis was performed using 1000 replicates. Bootstrap values < 70% were not shown. The recombinant strains were represented by black dots
Summary of enterovirus A recombination events detected by RDP5
| Recomb | Breakpoint pos | Recombinant strain | Minor Parent | Major Parent | Detection methods and p-values | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Begin | End | RDP | GENECONV | Bootscan | Maxchi | Chimaera | SiSscan | 3Seq | ||||
| 1 | 19a | 3619 | VR1432 | Henan2-09-China | CA8-Donovan | 6.34E−92 | 3.29E−86 | 2.45E−93 | 2.89E−33 | 3.70E−38 | 1.46E−77 | 1.01E−140 |
| 3 | 444 | 3575 | 30-2/2015/BJb | Huainan201401 | CA8-Donovan | 1.78E−61 | 9.55E−36 | 3.52E−55 | 6.08E−38 | 5.78E−03 | 3.43E−57 | 6.88E−86 |
| 5 | 16a | 4124 | Guangdong_2009 | Anhui1-09-China | CA14-G-14 | 2.92E−80 | 2.80E−80 | 2.09E−80 | 2.33E−19 | 2.43E−19 | 2.07E−94 | 7.43E−06 |
| 9 | 5412 | 7094 | EV71/P1034/2013 | B3-MY821-3 | Chongqing2-09–China | 1.77E−21 | NS | 7.35E−18 | 2.59E−22 | 4.59E−25 | 5.95E−17 | 3.66E−50 |
| 17 | 1256 | 2439 | Henan-ZMD/CHN/2012 | Hubei-WH/CHN/2012 | R615/YN/CHN/2010 | 2.15E−20 | 2.14E−21 | NS | 2.43E−04 | 7.75E−07 | 1.88E−10 | 3.46E−15 |
| 22 | 1596 | 2567 | VR1432 | Anhui1-09-China | C4b-SHZH98 | 2.38E−16 | 6.48E−21 | 2.84E−12 | 8.58E−12 | 6.73E−10 | 1.08E−22 | 9.65E−06 |
| 25 | 1930 | 3212a | 120/EV71/Wenzhou/CHN/2014 | SHAPHC5218/SH/CHN/14 | Hubei-WH/CHN/2012 | 9.75E−17 | 1.28E−07 | NS | 5.34E−09 | 1.09E−09 | 8.47E−08 | 1.20E−15 |
| 49 | 3762a | 5183 | EV71/P868/2013/China | EV71/P40/2013/China | Puyang-451–2012 | 8.03E−09 | 2.95E−10 | 8.45E−10 | 3.69E−04 | 7.51E−03 | 6.61E−07 | 5.53E−07 |
A complete detailed overview of the recombination events detected by RDP can be found in Supplementary Table S1
Minor Parent Parent contributing the smaller fraction of sequence, Major Parent parent contributing the larger fraction of sequence, NS No significant P-value was recorded for this recombination event using this method
aThe actual breakpoint position is undetermined (it was most likely overprinted by a subsequent recombination event)
bThe recombinant sequence may have been misidentified (one of the identified parents might be the recombinant)
Fig. 2Identification of intertypic recombination strains of EV71 by similarity plots and bootscan analyses. Similarity plots were conducted in a sliding window size of 200 nucleotides with 20-bp steps using the Kimura 2-parameter distance method; bootscan analyses were performed using the neighbor-joining tree model and the Kimura 2-parameter distance algorithm in a sliding window size of 200 nucleotides with 20-bp steps
Fig. 3Identification of intratypic recombination strains of EV71 by similarity plots and bootscan analyses. The similarity plot was conducted in a sliding window size of 200 nucleotides with 20-bp steps using the Kimura 2-parameter distance method; bootscan analysis was performed using the neighbor-joining tree model and the Kimura 2-parameter distance algorithm in a sliding window size of 200 nucleotides with 20-bp steps, applying the first recombinant strain EV71/P1034/2013. Similarity plots were conducted in a sliding window size of 1000 nucleotides with 20-bp steps using the Kimura 2-parameter distance method; bootscan analyses were performed using the neighbor-joining tree model and the Kimura 2-parameter distance algorithm in a sliding window size of 1000 nucleotides with 20-bp steps, applying the other recombinant strains