Literature DB >> 24119538

Human enterovirus 71 epidemics: what's next?

Cyril C Y Yip1, Susanna K P Lau, Patrick C Y Woo, Kwok-Yung Yuen.   

Abstract

Human enterovirus 71 (EV71) epidemics have affected various countries in the past 40 years. EV71 commonly causes hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in children, but can result in neurological and cardiorespiratory complications in severe cases. Genotypic changes of EV71 have been observed in different places over time, with the emergence of novel genotypes or subgenotypes giving rise to serious outbreaks. Since the late 1990s, intra- and inter-typic recombination events in EV71 have been increasingly reported in the Asia-Pacific region. In particular, 'double-recombinant' EV71 strains belonging to a novel genotype D have been predominant in mainland China and Hong Kong over the last decade, though co-circulating with a minority of other EV71 subgenotypes and coxsackie A viruses. Continuous surveillance and genome studies are important to detect potential novel mutants or recombinants in the near future. Rapid and sensitive molecular detection of EV71 is of paramount importance in anticipating and combating EV71 outbreaks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; genotype; hand, foot and mouth disease; human enterovirus 71; mutation; recombination

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24119538      PMCID: PMC3772321          DOI: 10.3402/ehtj.v6i0.19780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J        ISSN: 1752-8550


Human enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a small, non-enveloped, icosahedral virus that belongs to the human EV species A in the genus Enterovirus within the family Picornaviridae. EV71 and coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) are common etiological agents of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in children, but the former can cause severe complications, such as aseptic meningitis, acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), meningoencephalitis and cerebellitis, with mortality rate ranging from 10 to 25.7% (1, 2). Another neurotropic EV, poliovirus, is nearly completely eradicated as a result of global immunization efforts (3). Thus, in the absence of effective vaccines and antivirals against EV71, EV71 may become an important pathogen, replacing poliovirus, with increasing health threat to humans. Since the late 1990s, EV71 has seriously affected the Asia-Pacific region (4–10). In recent years, there have been an increasing number of reports of HFMD outbreaks with fatal cases due to EV71 in China (11–18). In 2012, EV71 was found to be associated with ‘mystery disease’ that killed most patients shortly after admission to hospital in Cambodia (19). EV71 is well known to cause outbreaks, which often occur in a cyclical pattern, every 2–3 years, in various countries (20). The single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome of EV71 is around 7.4-kb long, which is flanked by 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs). The polyprotein consists of P1, P2, and P3 regions, which encodes structural proteins, VP4, VP2, VP3, VP1, and non-structural proteins, 2A, 2B, 2C and 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, respectively. Based on molecular typing using VP4 and VP1 gene sequences (21), EV71 is classified into three genotypes, A, B (subgenotypes B1–B5), and C (subgenotypes C1–C5) (21, 22). A separate subgenotype B0 has recently been identified in a retrospective analysis of EV71 strains in the Netherlands from 1963 to 1967 (23). Two studies on complete genome analysis of EV71 strains of subgenotype C4 suggested that this subgenotype should be classified as a novel genotype D (24, 25). Mutation and recombination are well-known phenomena in EV evolution. The infidelity of EV 3D polymerase leads to their mutation rates of around one per genome per replication (26). Mutations in various regions such as 5′UTR, VP1, VP2, 2A, 2C, and 3D of EV71 have shown to be associated with alterations of virulence in animal models and humans (27–33). Recombination occurs in enteroviruses as a result of template switching during negative-strand synthesis, which is thought to be mediated by a ‘copy-choice’ mechanism (34, 35). Inter-typic and intra-typic recombination events were frequently detected in EV71 strains circulating in the Asia-Pacific region (24, 36–38). In recent years, recurring HFMD outbreaks caused by EV71 of subgenotype C4 (‘double-recombinant’ belonging to a novel genotype D) have been reported in Hong Kong and different provinces in China (11–16, 39). In this review, we provide an update on the epidemiology and genetic evolution of EV71.

Methods

Keywords including ‘EV71’, ‘EV71’, ‘EV’, ‘epidemiology’, ‘evolution’, ‘genotype’, ‘mutation’, and ‘recombination’ were used for Medline search. The search results were then manually screened for literature on the epidemiology and genetic evolution of EV71.

Epidemiology of EV71

Many studies have reported the detection of EV71 in clinical specimens of patients from various countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, and America (Table 1) (40–47). During 1969–1972, the prototype EV71 strain BrCr and related strains were first identified from patients with neurological disease in California (40). In the early 1970s, EV71 occurred in patients mainly with meningitis in USA, Sweden, and Australia (41–43). A large outbreak of poliomyelitis-like disease occurred in Bulgaria in 1975, during which 21% of around 700 cases showed paralytic forms and 27 were fatal as a result of EV71 infections (44, 48, 49). Three years later, EV71 was the major causative agent of meningitis and encephalitis during the severe epidemic of acute central nervous system (CNS) diseases in Hungary (45). During the 1970s, Japan experienced two outbreaks of HFMD by EV71, in which a significant proportion of patients with HFMD accompanied CNS disorders and some of them died (46, 50, 51). Based on the above findings, EV71 isolates in America, Australia, and Europe were strongly associated with severe CNS complications, while those in Japan showed both dermatotropic and neurotropic features. Mortality rates due to EV71 outbreaks in the 1980s were low when compared to those occurred in Bulgaria and Hungary in the 1970s (52).
Table 1

Summary of major EV71 outbreaks in different geographical regions

Time periodCountry/regionNo. of cases with EV71No. of deaths due to EV71Clinical findings (no. of cases)Genotype(s)References
1969–1972California201Meningitis (10), encephalitis (7), meningoencephalitis (1), myocarditis (1)A40, 79
1972New York110Meningitis (9), encephalitis (1), HFMD (1) 41
1972–1973Australia490Aseptic meningitis (39), rash alone (5), acute RTI (4), infective polyneuritis (1) 43
1973Sweden1950Mainly aseptic meningitis, some with HFMD 42
1975Bulgaria65 (by virus isolation); 282 (by serology)27Aseptic meningitis (30), bulbar forms with fatal outcome (27), poliomyelitis syndrome (8) 48
1977New York120CNS disease (7), HFMD (4), acute RTI (1), gastroenteritis (1) 71
1978Hungary32347 (not clear if all due to EV71)Meningitis (161), encephalitis (145), poliomyelitis (13), HFMD (4) 45
1973, 1978Japan71Some died (details not given)Mainly HFMD, some with CNS disorders 46
1986Australia1140Rash (61), RTI (35), meningoencephalitis (34) 64
1988–1990Brazil390Acute neurological disease (24)149
1997Malaysia2,628 HFMD cases29Cardiorespiratory failure (29) 53
1997–1998Singapore390Mainly HFMD, some with aseptic meningitis, AFP, myocarditis, coxsackie-like disease and neonatal pyrexia 150
1998Taiwan46934HFMD or herpangina, 78 with severe complications (mainly encephalitis) 54, 6163
1997–2000Peninsular Malaysia43 strains0HFMD (33), encephalitis (4), myocarditis (2), meningitis (1), HFMD with meningitis (1), oral ulceration (1), paralysis (1)B3, B4, C1, C2 6
1998–2000Taiwan340 (53 isolates for phylogenetic study)7 (from phylogenetic study)HFMD (20), HFMD with CNS involvement (12), meningoencephalitis (5), encephalitis (4), meningitis (2), CNS symptoms (1), HFMD with acute pharyngitis and asthmatic bronchitis (1), HFMD with acute gastritis (1), herpangina (1)Mainly C in 1998, B in 1999 and 2000 8
1999Perth140Meningitis (5), acute cerebellar ataxia (2), acute transverse myelitis (2), Guillain–Barré syndrome (2), benign intracranial hypertension (1), febrile convulsion (1), opso-myoclonus syndrome (1) 68
2000Korea120HFMD (8), HFMD and encephalitis (2), HFMD and bronchiolitis (1), AFP (1) C 106
2000Singapore814HFMD (76), non-HFMD [aseptic meningitis, herpangina, Guillain–Barré syndrome] (5) B47
1998–2003Japan110 strains0HFMD (95), URTI (4), influenza-like illness (3), herpangina (3), exanthema (3), meningitis (2) B4, B5, C2, C465
2000–2003Malaysia2774Mild HFMD (187), HFMD with CNS involvement (52), severe non-CNS HFMD (34), aseptic meningitis (4) B4, B5, C166
2005Vietnam1733HFMD (173), of which 51 complicated by acute neurological diseaseC1, C4, mainly C510
2006Brunei342HFMD or herpanginaB4, mainly B595
1986, 2007The Netherlands>40 in 1986, 58 in 20070Mainly fever, meningitis or encephalitis, gastrointestinal symptomsB2 in 1986, mainly C2 in 200723
2006–2007France281Mainly fever, some with HFMD, meningitis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, gastroenteritisC1 and C2 in 2006, C2 in 200760
2007Germany130Meningitis (9), HFMD (1) C258
2007Denmark170Meningitis (5), HFMD (4), unspecified viral infection (3), gastroenteritis (2), viral enteritis (1), HFMD with meningitis (1), meningitis with enteritis (1) B5, C1, C259
2008Hong Kong981HFMD (89), herpangina (2), fever, URTI, rash and pneumonia (7) (11.2% of the cases with complications including meningitis or encephalitis, pneumonia, AFP and shock)B5, C2, mainly C439
2008China—Fuyang596HFMD: mild (17), severe (36), fatal (6) C411
2008China —Guangdong55121Complete data available for 185 cases: 95% rash; encephalitis (7), paralysis (1), neurogenic pulmonary edema (5), pneumonia (4) C412
2008–2009Thailand231Mainly HFMD, brainstem encephalitis (2) B5, C1, C2, mainly C49
2009China—Beijing, Shandong, Guangdong1340HFMDC413
2009–2010China—Shanghai378Some died (details not given)HFMD, some with CNS involvementC414
2010China—Nanchang630HFMDC415
2008–2011China—Ningbo1,50310HFMD: mild (1,349), severe (144), fatal (10) C416

AFP=acute flaccid paralysis; CNS=central nervous system; HFMD=hand, foot and mouth disease; URTI=upper respiratory tract infections.

Summary of major EV71 outbreaks in different geographical regions AFP=acute flaccid paralysis; CNS=central nervous system; HFMD=hand, foot and mouth disease; URTI=upper respiratory tract infections. Since the late 1990s, recurrent EV71 epidemics of various scales have occurred in the Asia-Pacific region, including Australia, China, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam (4–10). A huge number of deaths associated with HFMD outbreaks occurred in Malaysia, Taiwan, and China. During the outbreak with 2,628 HFMD cases in Sarawak Malaysia, 29 children died due to rapidly progressive cardiorespiratory failure caused by EV71 in 1997 (53). In Taiwan, 78 of 405 children with severe complications died in the large HFMD outbreak in 1998 (54), followed by another outbreak in 2000 with 41 deaths among 80,677 HFMD cases (8). During these two outbreaks, EV71 accounted for a major proportion of deaths in children in Taiwan. Since May 2008, HFMD has been a notifiable disease in the national surveillance system in China (17). From 2008 to 2011, recurring HFMD outbreaks have occurred in various provinces in China and the number of HFMD cases increased from 488,955 with 126 deaths to 1,619,706 with 509 deaths (11–18, 55). During this period, coxsackieviruses A2, A4, A5, A6, A10, A12, A16, and EV71 were co-circulating in the outbreaks (13, 14, 56), of which EV71 was responsible for most fatal cases (16). The number of EV71-associated HFMD cases was relatively low in Europe compared to that in the Asia-Pacific region. In a prospective study from Norway (57), EV71 was detected in stool specimens from asymptomatic children, and the absence of disease may be due to host factors (immune system, genetic effect, nutritional and hygiene status) and/or viral factors. Since HFMD is not a disease under surveillance in Europe and healthy individuals are usually not the subjects under surveillance, the prevalence of EV71 may be underestimated (23, 58–60). EV71 epidemics usually occur in summer months. In studies with clinical specimens collected throughout the year, seasonal patterns of EV71 infection have been demonstrated. Several studies showed that EV71 could be detected throughout the year, but its predominance was found in different months in various regions (9, 10, 57). A higher incidence was observed in summer months in Norway (57), but in the fall in Vietnam and Thailand (9, 10). Some countries have shown two peak activities of EV71 infections during their study periods. In 1998, there were two peaks of EV71 infections (one in June and the other in October) in the large outbreak in Taiwan (61–63). In southern Vietnam, a smaller peak (March–May) and a higher peak (September–December) of EV71 infections were found in 2005, and these months are interim periods between the dry and wet seasons (10). In Hong Kong, a higher peak (May–June) and a smaller peak (October–December) have been noted in 2008 (39). In the Netherlands, a higher peak (June–July) and a smaller peak (September–October) of cases were observed during 1963–2008 (23). Some studies have also reported variation of peak season between different years. In Australia, peak activity of EV71 shifted from summer in 1973 to winter in 1986 (43, 59, 64). In Japan, EV71 was detected in summer months in 1998–1999, but was only detected in the fall during 2001–2002 (65). In Malaysia, EV71 predominance shifted from summer in 2000 to spring in 2003 (66). The observed seasonal changes may be due to climatic factors that favor viral survival, variations in host immune response to infection and host behaviors that increase contact between individuals.

Clinical impact of EV71 infection

EV71 infection usually causes HFMD or herpangina (54, 67), but it can result in more severe illness, which is characterized by high-grade fever (body temperature above 39°C), vomiting, and cardiopulmonary or neurological complications (54). In the large-scale EV71 epidemic in Taiwan in 1998, 78 patients died with severe illnesses, including AFP, aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, pulmonary edema or hemorrhage, and myocarditis, among whom around 80% had pulmonary edema or hemorrhage (54). During an HFMD outbreak in Australia in 1999, there was a study showing that 14 children with EV71 infection had neurological complications including meningitis, acute cerebellar ataxia, acute transverse myelitis, Guillain–Barré syndrome, benign intracranial hypertension, febrile convulsion, and opso-myoclonus syndrome (68). In a follow-up study of 142 children after EV71 infection with CNS involvement, neurological disease and cardiorespiratory failure were likely associated with neurologic sequelae (limb weakness and atrophy), delayed neurodevelopment, and reduced cognitive function (69). In 2012, more than 50 children, who presented with fever, respiratory illness, and neurological complications, died within a short period of time after admission to hospital in Cambodia, where EV71 was eventually identified as a possible cause of the outbreak (70).

Detection of EV71

Traditional methods of EV71 detection are virus isolation and serological tests (40, 41, 45, 46, 48, 64, 71, 72). For cell culture, human rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) and monkey kidney cell lines (e.g., Vero) are commonly used to isolate EV71 (1), but this method is rather time-consuming (take days to weeks) and has poor sensitivity (73). For serology, cases were reported as positive when paired sera from patients showed fourfold increase in neutralizing antibody titers against EV71 (40, 44–46, 48). However, acute and convalescent sera are usually taken at least 2 weeks apart (74), rendering serological tests on paired sera, together with virus isolation, unsuitable for managing EV71 in outbreak situations, during which early detection of EV71 is required to allow prompt implementation of preventive and control measures. Since the late 1990s, rapid and sensitive molecular diagnostic tests such as reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) have been increasingly applied for EV71 detection. In epidemiological studies during the HFMD outbreaks, 5′UTR and VP1 were the most widely used targets for EV71 detection (Table 2). 5′UTR was used because this region showed high sensitivity for the detection of EV71 (61, 73, 75). However, 5′UTR is a hot spot of recombination in enteroviruses (76, 77), making this region inappropriate for genotyping (21). In contrast, VP1 gene is most commonly used for phylogenetic analysis as it shows a high degree of genetic diversity and no homologous recombination has been reported to take place within the VP1 gene in EV71 (78). To better determine the prevalence of EV71 in clinical specimens, 5′UTR should be used for detection and VP1 for genotype and subgenotype classification.
Table 2

Summary of studies on the phylogeny of EV71 strains

Gene or regionNumber of nucleotides sequencedNumber of new strains for phylogenetic analysis (country/collection date)References
5′UTR44013 (Malaysia/1997)AbuBakar et al. (75)
VP1891113 (USA, Australia, Colombia, the Republic of China, Canada, Malaysia/1970–1998)Brown et al. (79)
VP4/VP242029 (Malaysia, Japan/1997; Taiwan/1998; Bulgaria, Hungary, Japan, Taiwan, USA/1973–1980)Shimizu et al. (151)
5′UTR68136 (Taiwan/1998)Wang et al. (61)
VP1529–63316 (Taiwan/1998)Shih et al. (97)
VP134120 (Japan, Malaysia, Singapore/1997–1998)Singh et al. (150)
VP42073 (Taiwan/1986); 20 (Taiwan/1998)Chu et al. (98)
VP189124 (Malaysia/1997–1998, 2000); 19 (Singapore/1998, 2000–2001);23 (Australia/1999–2000)McMinn et al. (4)
5′UTR and VP1648 and 84148 (Taiwan/1998–2000) for 5′UTR; 33 (Taiwan/1998–2000) for VP1Wang et al. (8)
5′UTR, VP4 and VP1646, 207 and 8551 (India/2001)Deshpande et al. (114)
VP4 and VP1207 and 89155 (USA, Malaysia, Singapore, Australia, Korea/1972–2002) for VP4; 12 (Korea/2000; Malaysia/2002) for VP1Cardosa et al. (21)
VP189111 (Korea/2000)Jee et al. (106)
VP189143 (Malaysia/1997–2000)Herrero et al. (6)
VP18915 (China/1997, 2000); 1 (Thailand/2002)Shimizu et al. (84)
VP4 and VP1207 and 89117 for VP4 and 19 for VP1 (China-Shenzhen/2001–2004)Li et al. (5)
VP18911 (Brazil/1999)Castro et al. (113)
VP189145 (Japan-Yamagata/1998–2003)Mizuta et al. (65)
VP4207121 (Japan-Fukushima/1983–2003)Hosoya et al. (83)
VP420741 (Taiwan/1986, 1999–2005)Lin et al. (85)
VP189148 (Australia-Sydney/1983–2001)Sanders et al. (86)
VP141485 (Taiwan/1998–2005)Kung et al. (101)
VP4 and VP1207 and 840–8917 for VP4 and 14 for VP1 (Malaysia-Sarawak/2000, 2003)Ooi et al. (66)
VP1partial-8911 with complete genome; others with partial VP1 (data not shown) (Norway/2002–2003)Witsø et al. (57)
VP189123 (Vietnam/2005)Tu et al. (10)
VP1 and 3Dpol891 and 139132 (the United Kingdom/1998–2006)Bible et al. (88)
VP140311 (Taiwan/2006–2007)Huang et al. (22)
5′UTR and VP1723 and 89116 (Austria/2001–2004)Ortner et al. (89)
VP1891199 (The Netherlands/1963–2008)van der Sanden et al. (23)
VP189126 (Japan-Toyama/1983, 1989, 1994, 1997, 2000, 2003, 2006)Iwai et al. (87)
VP189131 (Japan-Yamagata/1990–2007)Mizuta et al. (104)
VP137228 (Germany/1997–2007)Diedrich et al. (58)
VP1837–89134 (Brunei/2006); 7 (Malaysia/2006)AbuBakar et al. (95)
VP189156 (China-Shandong/2007)Zhang et al. (110)
VP18913 (France/2007–2008)Vallet et al. (105)
VP12556 (Hungary/2000, 2004–2005)Kapusinszky et al. (82)
VP1436–4583 (Korea/2003)Jeong et al. (107)
VP140311 (Taiwan/2008)Huang et al. (100)
VP18915 (China-Lu'an/2008)Yu et al. (81)
VP189110 (Singapore/2008)Wu et al. (93)
VP1158–15923 (Thailand/2008–2009)Chatproedprai et al. (9)
VP189128 (China-Jiangsu/2009)Mao et al. (112)
VP189158 (France/1994, 1999–2000, 2003–2009)Schuffenecker et al. (60)
VP189131 (China/2003, 2008–2009)Tan et al. (17)
VP215929 (Denmark/2005–2008)Badran SA et al. (59)
VP1NA44 (Taiwan/2008)Lee et al. (99)
VP189117 (China-Guangdong/2008)Sun et al. (12)
VP1403–8916 (Thailand/2008–2009, 2011)Puenpa et al. (92)
VP189120 (China-Henan/2009)Zhang et al. (111)
VP18918 (China-Shanghai/2009)Yan et al. (14)
VP130417 (China/2009)Yang et al. (13)
VP1315–7066 (Greece/2009–2010)Siafakas et al. (109)
VP18914 (China–Nanchang/2010)Liu et al. (15)
VP1NA78 (China-Ningbo/2008–2011)Ni et al. (16)

NA: not available.

Summary of studies on the phylogeny of EV71 strains NA: not available.

Genotypic changes in EV71

Based on molecular characterization using VP1 gene sequences, EV71 was classified into genotypes A, B, and C (Fig. 1) (79). The prototype strain BrCr isolated in 1970 during the epidemic in California was classified as genotype A (40, 79, 80). There was no report on the circulation of EV71 genotype A strains thereafter until 2008 when re-emergence of this genotype occurred in central China (81). Genotype A might not be the first genotype detected in human population because a novel subgenotype of EV71 circulating in the Netherlands during 1963–1967 was recently identified as subgenotype B0 (23), which existed earlier than genotype A. Since the 1970s, EV71 strains of genotype B (subgenotypes B1–B5) have been circulating globally. Subgenotype B1 was the major type responsible for EV71 epidemics in America (79), Europe (6, 23, 82), Asia (21, 83–85) and Australia (23, 79) in the 1970s, while subgenotype B2 became predominant in the United States (79), the Netherlands (23), Australia (86), and Japan (83) in the 1980s. In the mid-1980s, EV71 strains of subgenotype C1 emerged and have been circulating in different regions afterwards (Table 3) (4, 9, 10, 21, 23, 39, 57–60, 79, 82–92).
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of the VP1 region of EV71 strains detected in various countries, showing different genotypes and subgenotypes of EV71. Eight hundred and fifty-five nucleotide positions in each VP1 region were included in the analysis. The tree was constructed by the neighbor joining method and bootstrap values calculated from 1,000 trees. The scale bar indicates the estimated number of substitutions per 100 nucleotides. EV71 strains of potential novel genotype or subgenotype were highlighted in gray. GenBank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses.

Table 3

Summary of EV71 subgenotypes in different geographical regions from 1963 to 2011

Subgenotypes

YearAB0 (proposed)B1B2B3B4B5C1C2C3C4 (proposed genotype D)C5
1963NL
1965NL
1966NL
1967NL
1970 USA JPN
1971NL
1972NL, USA
1973JPN, NL, TWJPN
1974AUS, NLAUS
1975 BUL, NL
1976NL, USA
1977USANL
1978 HUN, NL, USA, JPN
1979NL, USA
1980 TW, USA
1981NL, USA
1982JPNNL, USA
1983JPN, USAAUS, JPN, NL, USA
1984 JPN
1985JPNNL
1986 TW, USA NL, USAAUS
1987USAUSAAUS, NL, USA
1988USAHK, USA
1989JPNAUS, JPN, USA
1990JPNAUS, JPN, NL, USA
1991AUS, CAN, NL, USA
1992AUS, NL, USA
1993JPNJPNJPN, USA
1994AUS, FRA, HK, NL, USA
1995AUS, NL, USAAUS
1996JPNAUS, JPNCHN, UK
1997GERJPN, MAL, SIN JPN, MAL, SINNL, MAL, USA JPN, HK, NL, MAL, UK, USAJPN
1998GERSINTWMAL, SIN, UKAUS, JPN, TW, UK, USACHN, HK, TW
1999 AUS, HK, SINMAL, TWFRA, HK, MAL, UK AUS, JPN, FRA, NL, UKHK
2000AUS, JPN, MAL, SIN, TW SINAUS, FRA, GER, HK, HUN, MAL, UKFRA, JPN, NL KOR CHN, HK
2001AUS, HK, SIN, TW AUT, GER, NL, TUR, UKFRA, JPNCHN, HK, TW
2002JPN, MAL, SIN, TWAUT, HK, MAL, NL, NOR, SIN, THA, UKHK, JPN, NLCHN, JPN
2003JPN, MAL, TW JPN, MAL AUT, FRA, GER, JPN, MAL, NORCHNCHN, HK, JPN, KOR
2004FRA, NL, UKNLAUT, CHN, FRA, GER, JPN, HK, HUN, TW
2005 MAL FRA, IRAN, NL, MAL, UK, VNMCHN,
DEN,
NLCHN, HUN, HK, TW, VNM VNM
2006BRU BRU, MAL, SIN FRA, UKCHN, DEN, FRA, GER, UKCHN, HK, JPN, THATW
2007DEN, TWDEN, NLCHN, DEN, FRA, GER, HK, NL, THA CHN, HK, JPNTW
2008CHNHK, SIN, TW THACHN, DEN, FRA, HK, NL, SIN, THA, UK CHN, HK, TW, THATW
2009THA, TWTHACHN, FRA, GRE, KOR, THA CHN, KOR, THA
2010CHN, GRE CHN, TW
2011THA CHN

AUS=Australia; AUT=Austria; BRU=Brunei; BUL=Bulgaria; CAN=Canada; CHN=China; DEN=Denmark; FRA=France; GER=Germany; GRE=Greece; HK=Hong Kong; HUN=Hungary; JPN=Japan; KOR=Korea; MAL=Malaysia; NL=The NL; NOR=Norway; SIN=Singapore; TW=Taiwan; THA=Thailand; TUR=Turkey; UK=The United Kingdom; USA=The United States of America; VNM=Vietnam.

Boldface denotes predominant subgenotype causing large outbreak.

Phylogenetic tree of the VP1 region of EV71 strains detected in various countries, showing different genotypes and subgenotypes of EV71. Eight hundred and fifty-five nucleotide positions in each VP1 region were included in the analysis. The tree was constructed by the neighbor joining method and bootstrap values calculated from 1,000 trees. The scale bar indicates the estimated number of substitutions per 100 nucleotides. EV71 strains of potential novel genotype or subgenotype were highlighted in gray. GenBank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Summary of EV71 subgenotypes in different geographical regions from 1963 to 2011 AUS=Australia; AUT=Austria; BRU=Brunei; BUL=Bulgaria; CAN=Canada; CHN=China; DEN=Denmark; FRA=France; GER=Germany; GRE=Greece; HK=Hong Kong; HUN=Hungary; JPN=Japan; KOR=Korea; MAL=Malaysia; NL=The NL; NOR=Norway; SIN=Singapore; TW=Taiwan; THA=Thailand; TUR=Turkey; UK=The United Kingdom; USA=The United States of America; VNM=Vietnam. Boldface denotes predominant subgenotype causing large outbreak. The emergence of a novel genotype or subgenotype of EV71 can lead to large outbreaks, with well-known examples in the Asia-Pacific region since 1997 (Table 3). In Malaysia, a widespread community HFMD outbreak with fatal cases occurred in 1997, during which the most prevalent subgenotype B3 was co-circulating with other subgenotypes B4, C1, and C2 (6, 21, 23, 53, 79, 85, 91). Subgenotypes B4 and C1 were identified as a cause of an outbreak in 2000 (6, 91), while subgenotype B5 was noted in an outbreak in 2005 (65, 66, 85, 91). In Australia, co-circulation of subgenotypes B3 and C2 contributed to a large outbreak in 1999, with subgenotypic changes to B4 and C1 in 2000 (4, 21, 23, 85, 86). In Singapore, three major outbreaks have been caused by subgenotypes B4 (2000) and B5 (2006 and 2008) (4, 85, 93, 94). Brunei reported its first EV71 outbreak in 2006, of which most EV71 isolates belonged to subgenotype B5 (95). In Taiwan, the predominant subgenotype C2 accounted for a devastating EV71 outbreak in 1998, followed by a shift to subgenotype B4 (1999–2003), C4 (2004–2005), C5 (2006), B5 (2007–2009), and C4 (2010) (8, 21–23, 85, 96–103). Intriguingly, similar pattern of inter-genotypic change (a change from one genotype to another) of EV71 has been observed in Japan in outbreaks since 1997 (65, 83–85, 87, 104). Inter-genotypic change of EV71 has also been detected in Europe. In the Netherlands, genotype B (subgenotypes B0, B1, and B2) from 1963 to 1986 was changed to genotype C (subgenotypes C1 and C2) since 1987 (23). In Denmark, only subgenotype C2 was identified in 2005–2006, with a shift to predominant subgenotype B5 in 2007 (59). In Germany, a shift from subgenotype B2 (1997–1998) to subgenotype C1 (2000–2003) has been noted, followed by intra-genotypic change (a change from one subgenotype to another of the same genotype) to C4 (2004) and C2 (2006–2007) (58). Intra-genotypic change of EV71 has been found in some other European and Asian countries. Two studies demonstrated that there was a shift from subgenotype C1 (2001–2003 in Austria; 2000 in Hungary) to C4 (2004 in Austria; 2004–2005 in Hungary) (82, 89). During 2000–2009, all EV71 strains belonged to genotype C in France, in which C1 strains predominated from 2000 to 2005, but C2 strains became predominant since 2007 (60, 105). In Korea, subgenotype C3 was identified in an EV71 epidemic in 2000, followed by the detection of subgenotype C4 in 2003 and 2009 (21, 85, 106–108). Circulation of a single EV71 subgenotype was reported in several places. In Iran, only EV71 of subgenotype C1 was detected from a child with AFP in 2005 (90). In Greece, all EV71 strains detected from children with HFMD, febrile illness, or maculopapular rash belonged to subgenotype C2 in 2009–2010 (109). Coexistence of more than one subgenotype was observed in some other regions (Table 3). During 1998–2006, subgenotype C1 predominated in the United Kingdom, with the existence of subgenotype C2 in 1999 and 2006 (88). The first report of subgenotype C5 in Vietnam showed that this predominant subgenotype was co-circulating with subgenotypes C1 and C4 in 2005 (10). In Thailand, subgenotypes C1 and C4 were identified in 2008, followed by the detection of subgenotypes C1, C2, C4, and B5 in 2009 (9, 84, 92, 110). In China, the major subgenotype C4, which was further divided into C4a (2002–2011) and C4b (1998–2004), co-circulated with subgenotype C2 (5, 12–17, 84, 110–112). Similar subgenotype predominance was noted in Hong Kong (situated on China's south coast), where the main subgenotype of EV71 belonged to C4, with co-detection of a minority of subgenotypes B3, B4, B5, C1, and C2 strains during 1998–2008 (39). Identification of EV71 genotype or subgenotype has not been standardized yet, although several studies have proposed certain criteria for typing. Distinct clusters with high bootstrap supports in phylogenetic trees constructed by using VP1 gene indicated the presence of a novel genotype or subgenotype of EV71 (4, 79). Furthermore, cutoff values for genotyping and subgenotyping of EV71 using VP1 have been proposed, with a nucleotide sequence divergence of 15–20% between genotypes and of 4–14% between subgenotypes (25, 79, 101). According to these criteria, previously untyped EV71 isolates may belong to a novel genotype or subgenotype. Two studies demonstrated that an EV71 strain 6658-COL-94 from Columbia and a strain 73442-PA-99 from Brazil were closely related to genotype B isolates (79, 113). Based on phylogenetic analysis using VP1 nucleotide sequences of EV71 (Fig. 1), the two strains formed branches separate from other genotype B strains. Moreover, VP1 sequence divergence between the Colombian strain and other genotype B strains was 6.1–12% and between the Brazilian strain and other genotype B strains was 8.2–12%, suggesting that they should belong to novel subgenotypes B6 and B7, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1, EV71 strains 2008-00643 and 2008-07776 from Taiwan (100) formed a cluster distinct from subgenotype C2 isolates. In addition, the VP1 sequence divergence between theses Taiwanese strains and other genotype C strains is 6.7–13.6%. These indicated that the two Taiwanese strains should be regarded as a new subgenotype C6. Phylogenetic analysis of 5′UTR, VP4 and VP1 sequences of an EV71 strain R13223-IND-01 isolated from a case of AFP in India in 2001 showed that it may belong to a novel genotype (114). As shown in Fig. 1, this isolate formed a branch distinct from other EV71 strains. Furthermore, the VP1 sequence divergence between this Indian strain and other strains of EV71 genotypes A, B, and C was 14.9–18.5%. These revealed that the strain R13223-IND-01 should be designated as a new genotype E. Recently, Chan et al. proposed new cutoff values for genotyping based on complete genome sequences of EV71, with a nucleotide divergence of 17–22% between genotypes and of 10–14% between subgenotypes (25). Complete genome sequencing and further sequence analysis are required to better determine the genotype or subgenotype of EV71.

Relationship between EV71 genotypes and disease severity

Several research groups have examined the relationship between EV71 genotypes and outcomes of EV71 infections. In a study from Australia, EV71 of subgenotype C2 was strongly linked to severe neurological disease in 1999 (4). Another study from Malaysia revealed that children infected with EV71 of subgenotype B4 were less likely to have CNS complications than those infected with other subgenotypes (66). However, a recent study from the Netherlands demonstrated that children with genotype B virus were more likely to have neurological complications than those with genotype C virus (23). In Taiwan, EV71 of genotypes B and C could be isolated from both fatal and mild HFMD cases from 1998 to 2000 (8, 97). Furthermore, VP1 sequences of EV71 isolated from patients with mild HFMD and fatal encephalitis in Malaysia in 1997 were almost identical (79). Hence, more careful and systematic analysis will be required to delineate the correlation between the EV71 genotypes and disease severity.

Recombination events in EV71

Under selective pressures from hosts and environment, recombination possibly takes place when at least two viruses infect the same cell, resulting in the production of progenies with new genomic combinations that may favor viral survival during evolution (115). As recombination in RNA viruses might enhance their host range (116) and pathogenicity (117), and confer antiviral resistance (118), it is important to assess the impact of recombination in EV71. Recombination is a common phenomenon in human enteroviruses, with preferential recombination sites in non-structural protein coding regions P2 and P3 (Fig. 2), where a high nucleotide sequence identity between two parental strains may favor homologous recombination by a ‘copy-choice’ mechanism (34, 35). Breakpoints are frequently detected at 5′UTR, P2 and P3 by recombination analysis using sequencing of different gene regions or complete genomes (24, 37, 38, 76, 77, 119–123). In a recent study using VP1 and 3D for recombination analysis on 308 EV71 isolates collected from 19 countries over a 40-year period, 11 3D clades were identified, each specific to EV71 and associated with specific subgenotypes but interspersed phylogenetically with clades of CVA16 and other HEV-A serotypes (124). Sporadic recombination events were detected within genotypes but no evidence for inter-typic recombination as described in other studies (24, 36, 37, 125). Since recombination breakpoints can occur at 5′UTR and different gene regions of EV71, amplification of two gene regions (VP1 and 3D) may not be sufficient to reveal the actual recombination events.
Fig. 2

Schematic diagram showing intra- and inter-typic recombination events occurred in EV71 strains SZ/HK08-5 and SZ/HK08-6 of subgenotype C4 (proposed genotype D).

Schematic diagram showing intra- and inter-typic recombination events occurred in EV71 strains SZ/HK08-5 and SZ/HK08-6 of subgenotype C4 (proposed genotype D). Recent studies on EV71 recombination usually involve complete genome sequence analysis. During the HFMD outbreaks in Malaysia in 1997, EV71 subgenotype B3 was predominant, which was also found in other areas in the Asia-Pacific region including Japan, Singapore, Australia, and Hong Kong (4, 21, 23, 36, 39, 83, 85) (Table 3) but disappeared after 1999. Complete genome analysis of two strains SHA63 and SHA66 showed that they were most closely related to EV71 genotype B strains for 5′UTR, P1 and P2 regions, but to CVA16 for the P3 and 3′UTR (36). This was the first to demonstrate inter-typic recombination (between different types of human enteroviruses, e.g., EV71 and CVA16). Since 1998, emergence of EV71 subgenotype C4 has been responsible for the HFMD outbreaks in China. Phylogenetic and bootscan analyses on two complete genomes of EV71 C4 strains SHZH98 and SHZH03 from Shenzhen revealed that they were most closely related to EV71 subgenotype C2 strain for P1 region, but to CVA16 for P3 region (37). In the same study, a CVA16 strain Tainan5079 was closely related to CVA16 strain G-10 for P1 region, but to EV71 strain BrCr of genotype A for P2 and P3 regions. These indicated that inter-typic recombination events have occurred between EV71 subgenotype C2 and CVA16 strain G-10, and between CVA16 strain G-10 and EV71 genotype A, both with a breakpoint at 2A region, a recombination hot spot in enteroviruses (1, 120, 121). Various recombinant forms of EV71 accounted for outbreaks in Taiwan since 1998. Inter-typic recombination between EV71 and coxsackievirus A8 (CVA8) was detected in EV71 subgenotype C2 isolates that were responsible for the large outbreak associated with severe encephalitis in 1998 (96), which was in line with a previous study (126). During 2000–2001, outbreaks in Taiwan were caused by EV71 subgenotype B4, which was possibly evolved from genotypes B3 and B2 (96). From 2004 to 2005, the predominant EV71 subgenotype C4 emerged and was shown to be a recombinant resulting from intra-typic recombination (between the same type of human EV, e.g., EV71) between genotype C and genotype B (96), consistent with a previous study (38). In China, a dramatic increase in the number of HFMD cases from 2007 to 2008 suggested EV71 and CVA16 might have undergone recombination (24). Complete genome analysis of two EV71 strains (SZ/HK08-5 and SZ/HK08-6) and two CVA16 strains (SZ/HK08-3 and SZ/HK08-7) from Shenzhen revealed inter-typic recombination between CVA16 strain G-10 and EV71 genotype A at the 2A–2B junction the two CVA16 strains (24), in line with previous results on CVA16 strain Tainan5079 (37). For the two EV71 strains, intra-typic recombination between EV71 genotypes C and B at 2A–2B junction and inter-typic recombination between EV71 genotype B and CVA16 strain G-10 in 3C region were observed (Fig. 2). These ‘double-recombinant’ EV71 strains circulating in China and other EV71 subgenotype C4 strains were proposed to be a novel genotype D (24). The proposal of this new genotype was also supported by another study conducted by Chan et al. (25). In this study, EV71 subgenotype C4 was shown to have a nucleotide sequence divergence of 18.1% (17–20%), which exceeded the average threshold divergence of 14.95% for EV71 subgenotyping when comparing with EV71 subgenotypes C1–C5. Based on the evidence from the two studies (24, 25), EV71 subgenotype C4 should be redesignated as the novel genotype D. Since 2008, there has been an increase in the number of studies on recombination in EV71 during HFMD outbreaks in China, including the ‘double-recombinant’ subgenotype C4 strains probably belonging to the proposed genotype D (11, 125, 127). Although the correlation between natural recombination in EV71 and pathogenicity remains uncertain, an in vitro study demonstrated that a chimeric recombinant virus with improved growth and larger plaque phenotypes could be artificially constructed by replacing the structural region of a slow-growth EV71 strain with the region of a rapid-growth EV71 strain (128). Thus, it is possible to generate a highly pathogenic EV71 strain when a less virulent strain can acquire an antigenically distinct capsid region or non-structural regions from a more virulent strain via natural recombination. Over the past decade, EV71 of predominant subgenotype C4 has been co-circulating with some other subgenotypes in mainland China and Hong Kong (5, 17, 23, 39, 129), which may increase the chance of recombination. In addition, densely populated areas with poor hygiene, sanitation, and healthcare infrastructure may further hasten not only recombination, but also viral mutation. As Hong Kong is a gateway to China with extensive passenger movements and global transport networks, it may be a place for the spread of novel EV71 mutants or recombinants to other cities, posing pandemic threats as in the case of SARS.

Antiviral strategies against EV71

Despite the occurrence of recurrent EV71 outbreaks with severe complications and fatal cases in the past few decades, effective antivirals against EV71 are still not available (130). Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been used in patients with complicated EV71 infections, which may help suppress viral replication and limit organ damage through anti-inflammatory activities (66). In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that ribavirin and type I interferons exhibited protective effects on EV71 (131, 132). Pleconaril has demonstrated antiviral activity against a broad spectrum of EV serotypes in vitro and in vivo (133), but it cannot inhibit the cytopathic effect induced by EV71 (134). In a study by Shih et al., mutation in VP1 of EV71 was shown to confer resistance to the inhibitory effects of pyridyl imidazolidinone (135). EV71 mutants resistant to inhibitors of 2C protein of EV71, including metrifudil, N(6)-benzyladenosine and NF449, have also been identified (136). In another study, Chen et al. demonstrated that EV71 displayed resistance to an antiviral agent DTriP-22 after an arginine-to-lysine substitution (R163K) in 3D polymerase (137). So far, none of these antivirals possessed efficacy high enough for clinical use. Due to the high frequency of mutations and recombination in EV71, viral factors may not be suitable targets for drug design. In contrast, targeting cellular factors temporarily dispensable for the host but essential for viral replication may prevent viral escape. RNA interference (RNAi) screening has been increasingly used to search for cellular factors required for viral infections (138–147) and this strategy holds a potential for antiviral development (148). Further investigations to identify host factors important for EV71 replication will help explore the mechanisms of EV71 pathogenesis.

Concluding remarks

Over the past few decades, EV71 epidemics have occurred in various countries and caused a significant proportion of severe complications and deaths in children, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. Mutation and recombination are the major evolutionary forces leading to emergence of genetically diverse EV71 variants that have accounted for the recurrent HFMD outbreaks. Despite recent findings of intra-typic and inter-typic recombination, the correlation between recombination and virulence in EV71 remains unclear. Owing to the common occurrence of recombination in EV71, sequencing of more than one region (e.g., VP1 and 3D) would allow the rapid and accurate genotyping of EV71 in clinical settings. To date, the majority of HFMD cases due to EV71 have been noted in China, which is the most populous country in the world. Since Hong Kong is well connected to China with international travel networks, the former may be a hub that facilitates the global dissemination of novel mutants or recombinants of EV71, posing pandemic threats in the near future. Continuous genomic studies on the evolution of EV71 in Hong Kong and other Asia-Pacific regions are important to detect new mutants or recombinants with epidemic potential. Frequent genetic variations in EV71 have hampered the development of drugs targeting to viral proteins and this obstacle could theoretically be overcome by targeting host factors that are inessential for humans but important for virus propagation. Genome-wide RNAi screening technology has successfully been applied for the identification of cellular factors crucial for replication of emerging viruses, such as HIV and influenza viruses. We foresee that this screening strategy will help unravel EV71–host interactions and provide insight into the discovery of novel antivirals to combat future EV71 epidemics.
  147 in total

1.  Epidemiological and etiological characteristics of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Ningbo, China, 2008-2011.

Authors:  Hongxia Ni; Bo Yi; Jianhua Yin; Ting Fang; Tianfeng He; Yan Du; Jin Wang; Hongwei Zhang; Lei Xie; Yibo Ding; Wenzhen Gu; Shu Zhang; Yifang Han; Hongjun Dong; Tong Su; Guozhang Xu; Guangwen Cao
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses.

Authors:  J W Drake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Molecular detection and identification of enteroviruses in children admitted to a university hospital in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos Siafakas; Ahilleas Attilakos; Sofia Vourli; Efstathios Stefos; Joseph Meletiadis; Polyxeni Nikolaidou; Loukia Zerva
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  An enterovirus 71 epidemic in Guangdong Province of China, 2008: epidemiological, clinical, and virogenic manifestations.

Authors:  Li-mei Sun; Huan-ying Zheng; Hui-zhen Zheng; Xue Guo; Jian-feng He; Da-wei Guan; Min Kang; Zheng Liu; Chang-wen Ke; Jian-sen Li; Leng Liu; Ru-ning Guo; Hiromu Yoshida; Jin-yan Lin
Journal:  Jpn J Infect Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.362

5.  The largest outbreak of hand; foot and mouth disease in Singapore in 2008: the role of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A strains.

Authors:  Yan Wu; Andrea Yeo; M C Phoon; E L Tan; C L Poh; S H Quak; Vincent T K Chow
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Recombination in circulating enteroviruses.

Authors:  Alexander N Lukashev; Vasilii A Lashkevich; Olga E Ivanova; Galina A Koroleva; Ari E Hinkkanen; Jorma Ilonen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies human host factors crucial for influenza virus replication.

Authors:  Alexander Karlas; Nikolaus Machuy; Yujin Shin; Klaus-Peter Pleissner; Anita Artarini; Dagmar Heuer; Daniel Becker; Hany Khalil; Lesley A Ogilvie; Simone Hess; André P Mäurer; Elke Müller; Thorsten Wolff; Thomas Rudel; Thomas F Meyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Cross-antigenicity among EV71 strains from different genogroups isolated in Yamagata, Japan, between 1990 and 2007.

Authors:  K Mizuta; Y Aoki; A Suto; K Ootani; N Katsushima; T Itagaki; A Ohmi; M Okamoto; H Nishimura; Y Matsuzaki; S Hongo; K Sugawara; H Shimizu; T Ahiko
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 9.  Human enterovirus 71 and hand, foot and mouth disease.

Authors:  S S Y Wong; C C Y Yip; S K P Lau; K Y Yuen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.451

10.  Mapping genetic determinants of the cell-culture growth phenotype of enterovirus 71.

Authors:  Patchara Phuektes; Beng Hooi Chua; Sharon Sanders; Emily J Bek; Chee Choy Kok; Peter C McMinn
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.891

View more
  70 in total

1.  Genetic diversity and evolution of enterovirus A71 subgenogroup C1 from children with hand, foot, and mouth disease in Thailand.

Authors:  Jiratchaya Puenpa; Kamol Suwannakarn; Jira Chansaenroj; Chompoonut Auphimai; Nasamon Wanlapakorn; Sompong Vongpunsawad; Yong Poovorawan
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 2.  Is a multivalent hand, foot, and mouth disease vaccine feasible?

Authors:  Michel Klein; Pele Chong
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Validation and evaluation of serological correlates of protection for inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in children aged 6-35 months.

Authors:  Pengfei Jin; Jingxin Li; Xuefeng Zhang; Fangyue Meng; Yang Zhou; Xuejun Yao; Zhengkai Gan; Fengcai Zhu
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Hand, foot and mouth disease: current knowledge on clinical manifestations, epidemiology, aetiology and prevention.

Authors:  Susanna Esposito; Nicola Principi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Downregulation of miR-155-5p facilitates enterovirus 71 replication through suppression of type I IFN response by targeting FOXO3/IRF7 pathway.

Authors:  Daokun Yang; Xinwei Wang; Haili Gao; Baoxin Chen; Changyun Si; Shasha Wang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Human tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase is an IFN-γ-inducible entry factor for Enterovirus.

Authors:  Man Lung Yeung; Lilong Jia; Cyril C Y Yip; Jasper F W Chan; Jade L L Teng; Kwok-Hung Chan; Jian-Piao Cai; Chaoyu Zhang; Anna J Zhang; Wan-Man Wong; Kin-Hang Kok; Susanna K P Lau; Patrick C Y Woo; Janice Y C Lo; Dong-Yan Jin; Shin-Ru Shih; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Therapeutic and prevention strategies against human enterovirus 71 infection.

Authors:  Chee Choy Kok
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2015-05-12

8.  2C Proteins of Enteroviruses Suppress IKKβ Phosphorylation by Recruiting Protein Phosphatase 1.

Authors:  Qian Li; Zhenhua Zheng; Yan Liu; Zhenfeng Zhang; Qingshi Liu; Jin Meng; Xianliang Ke; Qinxue Hu; Hanzhong Wang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 9.  Death waits for no man--does it wait for a virus? How enteroviruses induce and control cell death.

Authors:  Katharine G Harris; Carolyn B Coyne
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 7.638

10.  Safety and immunogenicity of an experimental live combination vaccine against enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Ting Yang; Tianhong Xie; Xia Song; Dong Shen; Hua Li; Lei Yue; Qinfang Jiang; Fanli Zhu; Huaqing Meng; Runxiang Long; Rong Yang; Feiyu Luo; Zhongping Xie
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.