| Literature DB >> 33574863 |
Y I Xiong1,2, Yaru Zhao1, Kuikui Ni2, Yue Shi1, Qingfang Xu1.
Abstract
Ligninolytic bacteria degrading lignin were isolates and identified, and their biodegradation mechanism of alkaline-lignin was investigated. Four strains with lignin degradation capability were screened and identified from the soil, straw, and silage based on their decolorizing capacity of aniline blue and colony size on alkaline-lignin medium. The degradation ratio of Bacillus aryabhattai BY5, Acinetobacter johnsonii LN2, Acinetobacter lwoffii LN4, and Micrococcus yunnanensis CL32 have been assayed using alkaline-lignin as the unique carbon source. Further, the Lip (lignin peroxidase) and Mnp (manganese peroxidase) activities of strains were investigated. Lip activity of A. lwoffii LN4 was highest after 72 h of incubation and reached 7151.7 U · l-1. Mnp activity of M. yunnanensis CL32 was highest after 48 h and reached 12533 U · l-1. The analysis of alkaline-lignin degradation products by GC-MS revealed that the strains screened could utilize aromatic esters compounds such as dibutyl phthalate (DBP), and decomposite monocyclic aromatic compounds through the DBP aerobic metabolic pathway. The results indicate that B. aryabhattai BY5, A. johnsonii LN2, A. lwoffii LN4, and M. yunnanensis CL32 have high potential to degrade alkaline-lignin, and might utilize aromatic compounds by DBP aerobic metabolic pathway in the process of lignin degradation.Entities:
Keywords: alkali-lignin; bacteria; biodegradation products; isolation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33574863 PMCID: PMC7810122 DOI: 10.33073/pjm-2020-037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Microbiol ISSN: 1733-1331
Screening and identification of bacterial isolates based on different media.
| Name | Species | Accession number | Alkaline lignin | Aniline blue | Brilliant blue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YB5 | MT745877 | ∘ | + | – | |
| CL32 | MT745880 | ∘ | + | – | |
| LN2 | MT745878 | ∘ | ++ | – | |
| LN4 | MT745879 | ∘ | ++ | – |
“∘” – diameter is over 0.2 cm, “+” – indicates that a hydrolyzed circle appears,
“++” – indicates that the hydrolyzed ring diameter is over than 1 cm, and
“–” – indicates that the hydrolyzed ring diameter is less than 0.5 cm
Fig. 1.(A) Phylogenetic tree of four strains. Strains in this study were marked with a red triangle (). (B) Scanning electron micrograph of lignin-degrading bacteria; “a” – B. aryabhattai YB5, “b” – A. johnsonii LN2, “c” – A. lwoffii LN4, “d” – M. yunnanensis CL32.
Fig. 2.(A) Bubble chart about colony size on alkaline lignin medium and OD600 in the alkaline lignin liquid medium of four strains. The bubble center points indicate the OD600 values, and the bubble size indicates the colony size, but it is not an isometric diagram. (B) The degradation rate of alkaline lignin. After the bacteria were cultured in an alkaline lignin medium for three days, the alkaline lignin degradation rates of strains were calculated (the OD value determined the degradation rate).
Fig. 3.Lip (A) and Mnp (B) activity dynamic of four strains. The color band around the line indicates the standard deviation. The width indicates the level of the standard deviation value. “a, b, c” indicates that the enzyme activity in the different periods was significantly different, and the same letter indicates any significant difference. “ND” – not detected. All activity assays were obtained from triplicate experiments.
The compounds identified in three solvents extracts from the alkali lignin degraded by the bacterial strains and the control sample.
| RT (min) | Compounds | CK | YB5 | LN4 | LN2 | CL32 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hexane as solvent | ||||||
| 19.24 | Pentonic acid lactone* | – | + | + | + | – |
| 22.65 | Hexadecanoate* | – | + | + | + | + |
| 24.46 | Octadecanoate* | – | + | + | + | + |
| 28.20 | Propyl hexadecanoate* | – | + | + | + | + |
| Dioxane as solvent | ||||||
| 8.45 | 2-Ethoxyethanol | + | + | + | + | + |
| 11.67 | 2,4-Hexadienal | + | + | + | + | + |
| 12.83 | Di (ethylene glycol) vinyl ether | + | + | + | + | + |
| 21.92 | Dimethylbiphenyl | + | – | – | – | – |
| 24.07 | 1,2,3-trimethyl-4-prop-1-enylnaphthalene | + | – | – | – | – |
| 26.87 | Diisobutyl phthalate | + | – | – | – | – |
| 29.32 | Dibutyl phthalate | + | – | – | – | – |
| Ethyl acetate as solvent | ||||||
| 21.54 | Acetosyringone | + | + | + | + | + |
| 22.93 | Diisooctyl phthalate | + | – | – | – | – |
| 23.6 | Palmitoleic acid | + | – | – | – | – |
| 23.79 | Dibutyl phthalate | + | – | – | – | – |
| 25.51 | Cis-Vaccenic acid | + | – | – | – | – |
“RT” – retention time, “+” – present, “–” – absent,
“*” – indicates that the derivatization reagent a silane group was determined,
“YB5” – B. aryabhattai YB5, “LN4” – A. lwoffii LN4, “LN2” – A. johnsonii LN2, “CL32” – M. yunnanensis CL32