Literature DB >> 33574454

Reproducibility of 3D scanning in the periorbital region.

Maria H J Hollander1, Joep Kraeima2, Anne M L Meesters3, Konstantina Delli2, Arjan Vissink2, Johan Jansma2, Rutger H Schepers2.   

Abstract

The reproducibility of scanning in the periorbital region with 3D technology to enable objective evaluations of surgical treatment in the periorbital region was assessed. Facial 3D-scans of 15 volunteers were captured at different time points with a handheld Artec Space Spider structured light scanner. Two scans were made with a one minute interval and repeated after 1 year; for both a natural head position and with the head in a fixation-device. On assessing the area between the eyelashes and eyebrows, the medians of the average deviations between the various cross-sections of the one minute interval 3D-scans ranged from 0.17 to 0.21 mm at baseline, and from 0.10 to 0.11 mm when the minute-interval scanning was repeated one year later. The systematic differences when scanning in a natural head position and fixated position were comparable. The reproducibility of the 3D processing was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). The repeated scanning deviations (baseline versus one year data) were well within the accepted clinical threshold of 1 mm. Scanning with a hand-held 3D-scanning device (Artec Space Spider) is a promising tool to assess changes in the periorbital region following surgical treatment since the median deviations are well below the clinically accepted 1 mm measuring error, for both the natural head and fixated positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33574454      PMCID: PMC7878901          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83335-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  30 in total

1.  Are facial expressions reproducible?

Authors:  D J Johnston; D T Millett; A F Ayoub; M Bock
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2003-05

2.  Accuracy and reproducibility of a 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetric imaging system.

Authors:  Marcio de Menezes; Riccardo Rosati; Virgilio F Ferrario; Chiarella Sforza
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Variation of the face in rest using 3D stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  T J J Maal; L M Verhamme; B van Loon; J M Plooij; F A Rangel; A Kho; E M Bronkhorst; S J Bergé
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Quantification of facial asymmetry: A comparative study of landmark-based and surface-based registrations.

Authors:  Tim Verhoeven; Tong Xi; Ruud Schreurs; Stefaan Bergé; Thomas Maal
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  [The third dimension of the face aging, improvement of its understanding].

Authors:  S Garson; E Delay; R Sinna; B Cornette de Saint Cyr; F Taha
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 0.660

6.  Reliability of optical devices for three-dimensional facial anatomy description: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Gibelli; C Dolci; A Cappella; C Sforza
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Application of Structured-Light 3-D Scanning to the Documentation of Plastic Fingerprint Impressions: A Quality Comparison with Traditional Photography.

Authors:  Wuchen Zhang; Deborah A Kosiorek; Amy N Brodeur
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 1.832

8.  Three-dimensional facial volume analysis using algorithm-based personalized aesthetic templates.

Authors:  A Jorien Tuin; Jene W Meulstee; Tom G J Loonen; Joep Kraeima; Fred K L Spijkervet; Arjan Vissink; Johan Jansma; Rutger H Schepers
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Reproducibility of Natural Head Position assessed with stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  Gundega Jakobsone; Ville Vuollo; Pertti Pirttiniemi
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.

Authors:  Jong Woo Choi; Jang Yeol Lee; Tae-Suk Oh; Soon Man Kwon; Sung Joon Yang; Kyung Suk Koh
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.078

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Practical and technical aspects for the 3D scanning of lithic artefacts using micro-computed tomography techniques and laser light scanners for subsequent geometric morphometric analysis. Introducing the StyroStone protocol.

Authors:  Dominik Göldner; Fotios Alexandros Karakostis; Armando Falcucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.