Ali Ben Charif1,2,3, Karine V Plourde1,2, Sabrina Guay-Bélanger1,2, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun1,4,5, Amédé Gogovor1,2,3,4, Sharon Straus6,7,8, Ron Beleno9, Kathy Kastner10, Robert K D McLean11,12, Andrew J Milat13,14, Luke Wolfenden15,16,17, Jean-Sébastien Paquette1,3,18, Friedemann Geiger19,20,21,22, France Légaré23,24,25,26,27. 1. VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada. 2. Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada. 3. Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada. 4. Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada. 5. Faculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 6. LiKaShing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 7. St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 8. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 9. Age-Well NCE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. 10. Best Endings, Toronto, ON, Canada. 11. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 12. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa. 13. School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 14. Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 15. School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. 16. Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia. 17. Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia. 18. Laboratoire ARIMED, Groupe de médecine de famille universitaire (GMF-U) de Saint-Charles-Borromée, Saint-Charles-Borromée, QC, Canada. 19. SHARE TO CARE Project, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Germany. 20. Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Germany. 21. Institute for Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Germany. 22. Department of Psychology, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. 23. VITAM-Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 0A4, Canada. france.legare@mfa.ulaval.ca. 24. Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada. france.legare@mfa.ulaval.ca. 25. Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada. france.legare@mfa.ulaval.ca. 26. Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada. france.legare@mfa.ulaval.ca. 27. Diabetes Action Canada, a SPOR Network in Diabetes and its Related Complications, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada. france.legare@mfa.ulaval.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The scale-up of evidence-based innovations is required to reduce waste and inequities in health and social services (HSS). However, it often tends to be a top-down process initiated by policy makers, and the values of the intended beneficiaries are forgotten. Involving multiple stakeholders including patients and the public in the scaling-up process is thus essential but highly complex. We propose to identify relevant strategies for meaningfully and equitably involving patients and the public in the science and practice of scaling up in HSS. METHODS: We will adapt our overall method from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Following this, we will perform a two-prong study design (knowledge synthesis and Delphi study) grounded in an integrated knowledge translation approach. This approach involves extensive participation of a network of stakeholders interested in patient and public involvement (PPI) in scaling up and a multidisciplinary steering committee. We will conduct a systematic scoping review following the methodology recommended in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual. We will use the following eligibility criteria: (1) participants-any stakeholder involved in creating or testing a strategy for PPI; (2) intervention-any PPI strategy proposed for scaling-up initiatives; (3) comparator-no restriction; (4) outcomes: any process or outcome metrics related to PPI; and (5) setting-HSS. We will search electronic databases (e.g., Medline, Web of Science, Sociological Abstract) from inception onwards, hand search relevant websites, screen the reference lists of included records, and consult experts in the field. Two reviewers will independently select and extract eligible studies. We will summarize data quantitatively and qualitatively and report results using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will conduct an online Delphi survey to achieve consensus on the relevant strategies for PPI in scaling-up initiatives in HSS. Participants will include stakeholders from low-, middle-, and high-income countries. We anticipate that three rounds will allow an acceptable degree of agreement on research priorities. DISCUSSION: Our findings will advance understanding of how to meaningfully and equitably involve patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives for sustainable HSS. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: We registered this protocol with the Open Science Framework on August 19, 2020 ( https://osf.io/zqpx7/ ).
BACKGROUND: The scale-up of evidence-based innovations is required to reduce waste and inequities in health and social services (HSS). However, it often tends to be a top-down process initiated by policy makers, and the values of the intended beneficiaries are forgotten. Involving multiple stakeholders including patients and the public in the scaling-up process is thus essential but highly complex. We propose to identify relevant strategies for meaningfully and equitably involving patients and the public in the science and practice of scaling up in HSS. METHODS: We will adapt our overall method from the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Following this, we will perform a two-prong study design (knowledge synthesis and Delphi study) grounded in an integrated knowledge translation approach. This approach involves extensive participation of a network of stakeholders interested in patient and public involvement (PPI) in scaling up and a multidisciplinary steering committee. We will conduct a systematic scoping review following the methodology recommended in the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual. We will use the following eligibility criteria: (1) participants-any stakeholder involved in creating or testing a strategy for PPI; (2) intervention-any PPI strategy proposed for scaling-up initiatives; (3) comparator-no restriction; (4) outcomes: any process or outcome metrics related to PPI; and (5) setting-HSS. We will search electronic databases (e.g., Medline, Web of Science, Sociological Abstract) from inception onwards, hand search relevant websites, screen the reference lists of included records, and consult experts in the field. Two reviewers will independently select and extract eligible studies. We will summarize data quantitatively and qualitatively and report results using the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will conduct an online Delphi survey to achieve consensus on the relevant strategies for PPI in scaling-up initiatives in HSS. Participants will include stakeholders from low-, middle-, and high-income countries. We anticipate that three rounds will allow an acceptable degree of agreement on research priorities. DISCUSSION: Our findings will advance understanding of how to meaningfully and equitably involve patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives for sustainable HSS. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: We registered this protocol with the Open Science Framework on August 19, 2020 ( https://osf.io/zqpx7/ ).
Entities:
Keywords:
Health and social services; Implementation science; Knowledge translation; Patient and public involvement; Scaling science; Scaling up; Spread; Strategy
Authors: Deborah S Porterfield; Laurie W Hinnant; Heather Kane; Joseph Horne; Kelly McAleer; Amy Roussel Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Nathan D Shippee; Juan Pablo Domecq Garces; Gabriela J Prutsky Lopez; Zhen Wang; Tarig A Elraiyah; Mohammed Nabhan; Juan P Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori; M Hassan Murad Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Jennifer O'Neill; Hilary Tabish; Vivian Welch; Mark Petticrew; Kevin Pottie; Mike Clarke; Tim Evans; Jordi Pardo Pardo; Elizabeth Waters; Howard White; Peter Tugwell Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Amédé Gogovor; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Ali Ben Charif; Robert K D McLean; David Moher; Andrew Milat; Luke Wolfenden; Karina Prévost; Emmanuelle Aubin; Paula Rochon; Giraud Ekanmian; Jasmine Sawadogo; Nathalie Rheault; France Légaré Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2020-01-11
Authors: Ali Ben Charif; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Annie LeBlanc; Léa Langlois; Luke Wolfenden; Sze Lin Yoong; Christopher M Williams; Roxanne Lépine; France Légaré Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Ali Ben Charif; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Amédé Gogovor; Mamane Abdoulaye Samri; José Massougbodji; Luke Wolfenden; Jenny Ploeg; Merrick Zwarenstein; Andrew J Milat; Nathalie Rheault; Youssoufa M Ousseine; Jennifer Salerno; Maureen Markle-Reid; France Légaré Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2022-03-24