Literature DB >> 33572151

In Vitro Assessment of Enteric Methane Emission Potential of Whole-Plant Barley, Oat, Triticale and Wheat.

Isaac A Aboagye1, Christine L Rosser1, Vern S Baron2, Karen A Beauchemin1.   

Abstract

The study determined in vitro enteric methane (CH4) emission potential of whole-plant cereal (WPC) forages in relationship to nutrient composition, degradability, and rumen fermentation. Two varieties of each WPC (barley, oat, triticale, and wheat) were harvested from two field replications in each of two locations in central Alberta, Canada, and an in vitro batch culture technique was used to characterize gas production (GP), fermentation, and degradability. Starch concentration (g/kg dry matter (DM)) was least (p < 0.001) for oat (147), greatest for wheat (274) and barley (229), and intermediate for triticale (194). The aNDF concentration was greater for oat versus the other cereals (531 vs. 421 g/kg DM, p < 0.01). The 48 h DM and aNDF degradabilities (DMD and aNDFD) differed (p < 0.001) among the WPCs. The DMD was greatest for barley, intermediate for wheat and triticale, and least for oat (719, 677, 663, and 566 g/kg DM, respectively). Cumulative CH4 production (MP; mL) from 12 h to 48 h of incubation was less (p < 0.001) for oat than the other cereals, reflecting its lower DMD. However, CH4 yield (MY; mg of CH4/g DM degraded) of barley and oat grown at one location was less than that of wheat and triticale (28 vs. 31 mg CH4/g DM degraded). Chemical composition failed to explain variation in MY (p = 0.35), but it explained 45% of the variation in MP (p = 0.02). Variation in the CH4 emission potential of WPC was attributed to differences in DMD, aNDFD, and fermentation end-products (R2 ≥ 0.88; p < 001). The results indicate that feeding whole-plant oat forage to ruminants may decrease CH4 emissions, but animal performance may also be negatively affected due to lower degradability, whereas barley forage may ameliorate emissions without negative effects on animal performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barley; methane emission; nutrient degradability; oat; triticale; wheat

Year:  2021        PMID: 33572151      PMCID: PMC7915071          DOI: 10.3390/ani11020450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  15 in total

1.  Wheat is more potent than corn or barley for dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from dairy cows.

Authors:  P J Moate; S R O Williams; J L Jacobs; M C Hannah; K A Beauchemin; R J Eckard; W J Wales
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Effect of maturity at harvest on yield, chemical composition, and in situ degradability for annual cereals used for swath grazing.

Authors:  C L Rosser; P Górka; A D Beattie; H C Block; J J McKinnon; H A Lardner; G B Penner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Forage use to improve environmental sustainability of ruminant production.

Authors:  J Guyader; H H Janzen; R Kroebel; K A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Screening of plants from diversified natural grasslands for their potential to combine high digestibility, and low methane and ammonia production.

Authors:  D Macheboeuf; L Coudert; R Bergeault; G Lalière; V Niderkorn
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Intake and digestion of whole-crop barley and wheat silages by dairy heifers.

Authors:  B-O Rustas; J Bertilsson; K Martinsson; T Elverstedt; E Nadeau
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Ammonia emissions and performance of backgrounding and finishing beef feedlot cattle fed barley-based diets varying in dietary crude protein concentration and rumen degradability.

Authors:  K M Koenig; S M McGinn; K A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions.

Authors:  J R Knapp; G L Laur; P A Vadas; W P Weiss; J M Tricarico
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Effects of different barley and oat varieties on methane production, digestibility, and fermentation pattern in vitro.

Authors:  P Fant; M Ramin; S Jaakkola; Å Grimberg; A S Carlsson; P Huhtanen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 10.  Rumen methanogens and mitigation of methane emission by anti-methanogenic compounds and substances.

Authors:  Amlan Patra; Tansol Park; Minseok Kim; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.