Abdel Haleem M Hussein1, Ahmed A Khames1, Abu-Bakr A El-Adasy1, Ahmed A Atalla1, Mohamed Abdel-Rady2, Mohamed I A Hassan3, Mahrous A Abou-Salim4, Yaseen A M M Elshaier5, Assem Barakat6,7. 1. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Assiut 71524, Egypt. 2. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt. 3. Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut 71524, Egypt. 4. Department of Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut 71524, Egypt. 5. Department of Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sadat City, Menoufiya 32958, Egypt. 6. Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia. 7. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21321, Egypt.
Abstract
The elaboration of new small molecules that target phosphodiesterase enzymes (PDEs), especially those of type 5 (PDE5), is an interesting and emerging topic nowadays. A new series of heterocycle-based aminothiazoles were designed and synthesized from the key intermediate, 3-oxo-N-(thiazol-2-yl)butanamide (a PDE5 inhibitor that retains its amidic function), as an essential pharmacophoric moiety. The PDE5 inhibitors prevent the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate, thereby causing severe hypotension as a marked side effect. Hence, an in vivo testing of the target compounds was conducted to verify its relation with arterial blood pressure. Utilizing sildenafil as the reference drug, Compounds 5, 10a, and 11b achieved 100% inhibitions of PDE5 without significantly lowering the mean arterial blood pressures (115.95 ± 2.91, 110.3 ± 2.84, and 78.3 ± 2.57, respectively). The molecular docking study revealed that the tested compounds exhibited docking poses that were similar to that of sildenafil (exploiting the amide functionality that interacted with GLN:817:A). The molecular shape and electrostatic similarity revealed a comparable physically achievable electrostatic potential with the reference drug, sildenafil. Therefore, these concomitant results revealed that the tested compounds exerted sildenafil-like inhibitory effects (although without its known drawbacks) on blood circulation, thus suggesting that the tested compounds might represent a cornerstone of beneficial drug candidates for the safe treatment for erectile dysfunction.
The elaboration of new small molecules that target phosphodiesterase enzymes (PDEs), especially those of type 5 (PDE5), is an interesting and emerging topic nowadays. A new n class="Chemical">series of heterocycle-based aminothiazoles were designed and synthesized from the key intermediate, 3-oxo-N-(thiazol-2-yl)butanamide (a PDE5 inhibitor that retains its amidic function), as an essential pharmacophoric moiety. The PDE5 inhibitors prevent the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate, thereby causing severe hypotension as a marked side effect. Hence, an in vivo testing of the target compounds was conducted to verify its relation with arterial blood pressure. Utilizing sildenafil as the reference drug, Compounds 5, 10a, and 11b achieved 100% inhibitions of PDE5 without significantly lowering the mean arterial blood pressures (115.95 ± 2.91, 110.3 ± 2.84, and 78.3 ± 2.57, respectively). The molecular docking study revealed that the tested compounds exhibited docking poses that were similar to that of sildenafil (exploiting the amide functionality that interacted with GLN:817:A). The molecular shape and electrostatic similarity revealed a comparable physically achievable electrostatic potential with the reference drug, sildenafil. Therefore, these concomitant results revealed that the tested compounds exerted sildenafil-like inhibitory effects (although without its known drawbacks) on blood circulation, thus suggesting that the tested compounds might represent a cornerstone of beneficial drug candidates for the safe treatment for erectile dysfunction.
Authors: Graeme L Card; Bruce P England; Yoshihisa Suzuki; Daniel Fong; Ben Powell; Byunghun Lee; Catherine Luu; Maryam Tabrizizad; Sam Gillette; Prabha N Ibrahim; Dean R Artis; Gideon Bollag; Michael V Milburn; Sung-Hou Kim; Joseph Schlessinger; Kam Y J Zhang Journal: Structure Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Yaseen A M M Elshaier; Mohamed A Shaaban; Mohammed K Abd El Hamid; Mostafa H Abdelrahman; Mahrous A Abou-Salim; Sara M Elgazwi; Fathi Halaweish Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Edward A Kesicki; Mai A Bailey; Yulia Ovechkina; Julie V Early; Torey Alling; Julie Bowman; Edison S Zuniga; Suryakanta Dalai; Naresh Kumar; Thierry Masquelin; Philip A Hipskind; Joshua O Odingo; Tanya Parish Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Abdel Haleem M Hussein; Abu-Bakr A El-Adasy; Ahmed M El-Saghier; M Olish; Aboubakr H Abdelmonsef Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 4.036