Literature DB >> 33571319

Histological outcomes in HPV-screened elderly women in Denmark.

Gry St-Martin1, Petra Hall Viborg2, Ane Birgitte Telén Andersen2, Berit Andersen3,4, Jette Christensen5, Dorthe Ejersbo6, Hanne Nørgaard Heje7, Kirsten Marie Jochumsen8, Tonje Johansen9, Lise Grupe Larsen10, Elsebeth Lynge1,11, Reza Rafiolsadat Serizawa12, Marianne Waldstrøm6,13.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Danish women exit cervical cancer screening at age 65 years, but 23% of cervical cancer cases occur beyond this age. In addition, due to gradual implementation of cervical cancer screening, older women are underscreened by today´s standards. A one-time screening with HPV test was therefore offered to Danish women born before 1948.
METHODS: Register based study reporting histology diagnoses and conizations in women found HPV positive in the one-time screening. Number and proportion of women with severe or non-severe histology results were calculated for screened and HPV-positive women by age group or region of residence. Number of women with biopsy and/or conization per case of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) or CIN3+ were also calculated by age groups and region.
RESULTS: 4,479 (4.1% of screened women) had positive HPV test. 94% of these had one or more additional tests. 2,785 (62%) of HPV-positive women had histology results, and conization was performed in 1,076 (24% of HPV-positive and 1% of all screened women). HPV positivity and CIN3+ detection varied little between regions, but the proportions of HPV positive women undergoing histology varied between regions from 40% to 86% and the proportion with conization from 13% to 36%. Correspondingly, the number of histologies and conizations per CIN3+ detected varied from 5.9 to 11.2 and 1.8 to 4.7, respectively. In total, 514 CIN2+ (0.47% of screened women, 11% of HPV-positive) and 337 CIN3+ (0.31% of screened women, 7.5% of HPV-positive) were diagnosed, including 37 cervical cancer cases. DISCUSSION: HPV screening of insufficiently screened birth cohorts can potentially prevent morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer but longer follow-up is needed to see if cancer incidence declines in the screened women in the coming years. Management strategies differed among regions which influenced the proportions undergoing biopsy/conization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33571319      PMCID: PMC7877658          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  17 in total

1.  The Danish Pathology Register.

Authors:  Beth Bjerregaard; Ole B Larsen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Screening for cancer: when to stop?: A practical guide and review of the evidence.

Authors:  Michael C Soung
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.456

3.  Cervical cancer incidence in elderly women-biology or screening history?

Authors:  Elsebeth Lynge; Stefan Lönnberg; Sven Törnberg
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Temporal Patterns of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Danish Women 55 Years and Older Diagnosed With Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Anne Hammer; Lene Hee; Jan Blaakær; Patti Gravitt
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Cervical screening in women over 65. PRO: Are we asking the right question?

Authors:  Laurie Elit
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Cervical screening in Denmark - a success followed by stagnation.

Authors:  Elsebeth Lynge; Berit Andersen; Jette Christensen; Dorthe Ejersbo; Kirsten Jochumsen; Tonje Johansen; Jette Kolding Kristensen; Lise Grupe Larsen; Frank Mehnert; Ellen Mikkelsen; Karsten Nielsen; Carsten Rygaard; Reza Serizawa; Marianne Waldstrøm
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Cervical screening at age 50-64 years and the risk of cervical cancer at age 65 years and older: population-based case control study.

Authors:  Alejandra Castañón; Rebecca Landy; Jack Cuzick; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above.

Authors:  Matejka Rebolj; Jesper Bonde; Sarah Preisler; Ditte Ejegod; Carsten Rygaard; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden.

Authors:  Jiangrong Wang; Bengt Andrae; Karin Sundström; Alexander Ploner; Peter Ström; K Miriam Elfström; Joakim Dillner; Pär Sparén
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Cervical dysplasia in elderly women performing repeated self-sampling for HPV testing.

Authors:  Annika Kristina Lindström; Ruth Sanchez Hermansson; Inger Gustavsson; Julia Hedlund Lindberg; Ulf Gyllensten; Matts Olovsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adherence to follow-up after the exit cervical cancer screening test at age 60-64: A nationwide register-based study.

Authors:  Susanne F Jørgensen; Berit Andersen; Lone Kjeld Petersen; Matejka Rebolj; Sisse H Njor
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.452

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.