Elsebeth Lynge1, Stefan Lönnberg2, Sven Törnberg3. 1. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: elsebeth@sund.ku.dk. 2. Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway. 3. Stockholm Gotland Regional Cancer Centre, Sweden.
Abstract
AIM: In many countries, the age-specific pattern of cervical cancer incidence is currently bipolar with peaks at for instance 45 and 65 years of age. Consequently, a large proportion of cervical cancer cases are presently diagnosed in women above the screening age. The purpose of the study was to determine whether this bipolar pattern in age-specific incidence of cervical cancer reflects underlying biology or can be explained by the fact that the data come from birth cohorts with different screening histories. METHODS: Combination of historical data on cervical screening and population-based cancer incidence data from Denmark 1943-2013, Finland and Norway 1953-2013, and Sweden 1958-2013. RESULTS: Since the implementation of screening, the incidence of cervical cancer has decreased for each successive birth cohort. All birth cohorts showed a unipolar age-specific pattern. In unscreened women in Denmark and Sweden, the incidence peaked around the age of 50; the peak was less marked in Finland; while peak age for unscreened women could not be determined for Norway due to widespread opportunistic screening. The current old-age peak in the incidence of cervical cancer represents residuals from unscreened or underscreened birth cohorts. CONCLUSION: The current bipolar pattern in age-specific incidence of cervical cancer can largely be explained by the different screening histories of successive birth cohorts. While it is reasonable to offer screening to elderly women today, birth cohort trends in disease burden should be carefully monitored to justify permanent changes in upper screening age.
AIM: In many countries, the age-specific pattern of cervical cancer incidence is currently bipolar with peaks at for instance 45 and 65 years of age. Consequently, a large proportion of cervical cancer cases are presently diagnosed in women above the screening age. The purpose of the study was to determine whether this bipolar pattern in age-specific incidence of cervical cancer reflects underlying biology or can be explained by the fact that the data come from birth cohorts with different screening histories. METHODS: Combination of historical data on cervical screening and population-based cancer incidence data from Denmark 1943-2013, Finland and Norway 1953-2013, and Sweden 1958-2013. RESULTS: Since the implementation of screening, the incidence of cervical cancer has decreased for each successive birth cohort. All birth cohorts showed a unipolar age-specific pattern. In unscreened women in Denmark and Sweden, the incidence peaked around the age of 50; the peak was less marked in Finland; while peak age for unscreened women could not be determined for Norway due to widespread opportunistic screening. The current old-age peak in the incidence of cervical cancer represents residuals from unscreened or underscreened birth cohorts. CONCLUSION: The current bipolar pattern in age-specific incidence of cervical cancer can largely be explained by the different screening histories of successive birth cohorts. While it is reasonable to offer screening to elderly women today, birth cohort trends in disease burden should be carefully monitored to justify permanent changes in upper screening age.