Literature DB >> 33571222

The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension.

Samantha K Stanley1,2, Anna Klas3, Edward J R Clarke4, Iain Walker1,2.   

Abstract

Recent research promotes comparing the current state of the environment with the past (and not the future) to increase the pro-environmental attitudes of those on the political right. We aimed to replicate this temporal framing effect and extend on research in this area by testing the potential drivers of the effect. Across two large-scale replication studies, we found limited evidence that past comparisons (relative to future comparisons) increase pro-environmentalism among those with a more conservative political ideology, thus precluding a full investigation into the mediators of the effect. Where the effect was present, it was not consistent across studies. In Study One, conservatives reported greater certainty that climate change was real after viewing past comparisons, as the environmental changes were perceived as more certain. However, in Study Two, the temporal framing condition interacted with political orientation to instead undermine the certainty about climate change among political liberals in the past-focused condition. Together, these studies present the first evidence of backfire from temporal frames, and do not support the efficacy of past comparisons for increasing conservatives' environmentalism. We echo recent calls for open science principles, including preregistration and efforts to replicate existing work, and suggest the replication of other methods of inducing temporal comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33571222      PMCID: PMC7877654          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  25 in total

1.  Time perspective and environmental engagement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Taciano L Milfont; Jessie Wilson; Pollyane Diniz
Journal:  Int J Psychol       Date:  2012-03-27

2.  The psychological distance of climate change.

Authors:  Alexa Spence; Wouter Poortinga; Nick Pidgeon
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

Authors:  Jesse Graham; Jonathan Haidt; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-05

4.  System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of "system-sanctioned change".

Authors:  Irina Feygina; John T Jost; Rachel E Goldsmith
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-12-15

5.  The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale.

Authors:  Arnold K Ho; Jim Sidanius; Nour Kteily; Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington; Felicia Pratto; Kristin E Henkel; Rob Foels; Andrew L Stewart
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-10-19

6.  Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives.

Authors:  Matthew Baldwin; Joris Lammers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure.

Authors:  D M Webster; A W Kruglanski
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-12

8.  Are Psychology Journals Anti-replication? A Snapshot of Editorial Practices.

Authors:  G N Martin; Richard M Clarke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-11

9.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  A tragedy of the (academic) commons: interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers.

Authors:  Jim A C Everett; Brian D Earp
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.