OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of total variation regularized expectation maximization (TVREM) reconstruction on the image quality of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using phantom and patient data. METHODS: Images of a phantom with small hot sphere inserts and 20 prostate cancer patients were acquired with a digital PET/CT using list-mode and reconstructed with ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and TVREM with seven penalisation factors between 0.01 and 0.42 for 2 and 3 minutes-per-bed (m/b) acquisition. The contrast recovery (CR) and background variability (BV) of the phantom, image noise of the liver, and SUVmax of the lesions were measured. Qualitative image quality was scored by two radiologists using a 5-point scale (1-poor, 5-excellent). RESULTS: The performance of CR, BV, and image noise, and the gain of SUVmax was higher for TVREM 2 m/b groups with the penalization of 0.07 to 0.28 compared to OSEM 3 m/b group (all p < 0.05). The image noise of OSEM 3 m/b group was equivalent to TVREM 2 and 3 m/b groups with a penalization of 0.14 and 0.07, while lesions' SUVmax increased 15 and 20%. The highest qualitative score was attained at the penalization of 0.21 (3.30 ± 0.66) for TVREM 2 m/b groups and the penalization 0.14 (3.80 ± 0.41) for 3 m/b group that equal to or greater than OSEM 3 m/b group (2.90 ± 0.45, p = 0.2 and p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TVREM improves lesion contrast and reduces image noise, which allows shorter acquisition with preserved image quality for PSMA PET/CT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: TVREM reconstruction with optimized penalization factors can generate higher quality PSMA-PET images for prostate cancer diagnosis.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of total variation regularized expectation maximization (TVREM) reconstruction on the image quality of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using phantom and patient data. METHODS: Images of a phantom with small hot sphere inserts and 20 prostate cancer patients were acquired with a digital PET/CT using list-mode and reconstructed with ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and TVREM with seven penalisation factors between 0.01 and 0.42 for 2 and 3 minutes-per-bed (m/b) acquisition. The contrast recovery (CR) and background variability (BV) of the phantom, image noise of the liver, and SUVmax of the lesions were measured. Qualitative image quality was scored by two radiologists using a 5-point scale (1-poor, 5-excellent). RESULTS: The performance of CR, BV, and image noise, and the gain of SUVmax was higher for TVREM 2 m/b groups with the penalization of 0.07 to 0.28 compared to OSEM 3 m/b group (all p < 0.05). The image noise of OSEM 3 m/b group was equivalent to TVREM 2 and 3 m/b groups with a penalization of 0.14 and 0.07, while lesions' SUVmax increased 15 and 20%. The highest qualitative score was attained at the penalization of 0.21 (3.30 ± 0.66) for TVREM 2 m/b groups and the penalization 0.14 (3.80 ± 0.41) for 3 m/b group that equal to or greater than OSEM 3 m/b group (2.90 ± 0.45, p = 0.2 and p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TVREM improves lesion contrast and reduces image noise, which allows shorter acquisition with preserved image quality for PSMA PET/CT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: TVREM reconstruction with optimized penalization factors can generate higher quality PSMA-PET images for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Authors: Sangtae Ahn; Steven G Ross; Evren Asma; Jun Miao; Xiao Jin; Lishui Cheng; Scott D Wollenweber; Ravindra M Manjeshwar Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Wolfgang P Fendler; Matthias Eiber; Mohsen Beheshti; Jamshed Bomanji; Francesco Ceci; Steven Cho; Frederik Giesel; Uwe Haberkorn; Thomas A Hope; Klaus Kopka; Bernd J Krause; Felix M Mottaghy; Heiko Schöder; John Sunderland; Simon Wan; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Stefano Fanti; Ken Herrmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Elin Lindström; Anders Sundin; Carlos Trampal; Lars Lindsjö; Ezgi Ilan; Torsten Danfors; Gunnar Antoni; Jens Sörensen; Mark Lubberink Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Eugene J Teoh; Daniel R McGowan; David M Schuster; Maria T Tsakok; Fergus V Gleeson; Kevin M Bradley Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Michael S Hofman; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Roslyn J Francis; Colin Tang; Ian Vela; Paul Thomas; Natalie Rutherford; Jarad M Martin; Mark Frydenberg; Ramdave Shakher; Lih-Ming Wong; Kim Taubman; Sze Ting Lee; Edward Hsiao; Paul Roach; Michelle Nottage; Ian Kirkwood; Dickon Hayne; Emma Link; Petra Marusic; Anetta Matera; Alan Herschtal; Amir Iravani; Rodney J Hicks; Scott Williams; Declan G Murphy Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-03-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Eugene J Teoh; Daniel R McGowan; Ruth E Macpherson; Kevin M Bradley; Fergus V Gleeson Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 10.057