Literature DB >> 33570915

Spatial Segmentation of Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data by Combining Multivariate Clustering and Univariate Thresholding.

Hang Hu1, Ruichuan Yin1, Hilary M Brown1, Julia Laskin1.   

Abstract

Spatial segmentation partitions mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) data into distinct regions, providing a concise visualization of the vast amount of data and identifying regions of interest (ROIs) for downstream statistical analysis. Unsupervised approaches are particularly attractive, as they may be used to discover the underlying subpopulations present in the high-dimensional MSI data without prior knowledge of the properties of the sample. Herein, we introduce an unsupervised spatial segmentation approach, which combines multivariate clustering and univariate thresholding to generate comprehensive spatial segmentation maps of the MSI data. This approach combines matrix factorization and manifold learning to enable high-quality image segmentation without an extensive hyperparameter search. In parallel, some ion images inadequately represented in the multivariate analysis were treated using univariate thresholding to generate complementary spatial segments. The final spatial segmentation map was assembled from segment candidates that were generated using both techniques. We demonstrate the performance and robustness of this approach for two MSI data sets of mouse uterine and kidney tissue sections that were acquired with different spatial resolutions. The resulting segmentation maps are easy to interpret and project onto the known anatomical regions of the tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33570915      PMCID: PMC7904669          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  46 in total

1.  Self-Organizing Map and Relational Perspective Mapping for the Accurate Visualization of High-Dimensional Hyperspectral Data.

Authors:  Wil Gardner; Ruqaya Maliki; Suzanne M Cutts; Benjamin W Muir; Davide Ballabio; David A Winkler; Paul J Pigram
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Mass spectrometry imaging for clinical research - latest developments, applications, and current limitations.

Authors:  Pierre-Maxence Vaysse; Ron M A Heeren; Tiffany Porta; Benjamin Balluff
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.616

3.  Hyperspectral visualization of mass spectrometry imaging data.

Authors:  Judith M Fonville; Claire L Carter; Luis Pizarro; Rory T Steven; Andrew D Palmer; Rian L Griffiths; Patricia F Lalor; John C Lindon; Jeremy K Nicholson; Elaine Holmes; Josephine Bunch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  Avoiding common pitfalls when clustering biological data.

Authors:  Tom Ronan; Zhijie Qi; Kristen M Naegle
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 8.192

5.  Atmospheric pressure MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of tissues and cells at 1.4-μm lateral resolution.

Authors:  Mario Kompauer; Sven Heiles; Bernhard Spengler
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Connecting imaging mass spectrometry and magnetic resonance imaging-based anatomical atlases for automated anatomical interpretation and differential analysis.

Authors:  Nico Verbeeck; Jeffrey M Spraggins; Monika J M Murphy; Hui-Dong Wang; Ariel Y Deutch; Richard M Caprioli; Raf Van de Plas
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.036

7.  Tissue imaging using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Julia Laskin; Brandi S Heath; Patrick J Roach; Lisa Cazares; O John Semmes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Efficient spatial segmentation of large imaging mass spectrometry datasets with spatially aware clustering.

Authors:  Theodore Alexandrov; Jan Hendrik Kobarg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Gaussian Mixture Models and Model Selection for [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Classification in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Rui Li; Robert Perneczky; Igor Yakushev; Stefan Förster; Alexander Kurz; Alexander Drzezga; Stefan Kramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dimensionality reduction by UMAP to visualize physical and genetic interactions.

Authors:  Michael W Dorrity; Lauren M Saunders; Christine Queitsch; Stanley Fields; Cole Trapnell
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  3 in total

1.  Data parsing in mass spectrometry imaging using R Studio and Cardinal: A tutorial.

Authors:  Cameron J Shedlock; Katherine A Stumpo
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab       Date:  2021-12-20

2.  Fuzzy Information Discrimination Measures and Their Application to Low Dimensional Embedding Construction in the UMAP Algorithm.

Authors:  Liliya A Demidova; Artyom V Gorchakov
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-04-15

3.  Self-supervised clustering of mass spectrometry imaging data using contrastive learning.

Authors:  Hang Hu; Jyothsna Padmakumar Bindu; Julia Laskin
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 9.825

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.