Literature DB >> 28254588

Connecting imaging mass spectrometry and magnetic resonance imaging-based anatomical atlases for automated anatomical interpretation and differential analysis.

Nico Verbeeck1, Jeffrey M Spraggins2, Monika J M Murphy3, Hui-Dong Wang4, Ariel Y Deutch5, Richard M Caprioli6, Raf Van de Plas7.   

Abstract

Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is a molecular imaging technology that can measure thousands of biomolecules concurrently without prior tagging, making it particularly suitable for exploratory research. However, the data size and dimensionality often makes thorough extraction of relevant information impractical. To help guide and accelerate IMS data analysis, we recently developed a framework that integrates IMS measurements with anatomical atlases, opening up opportunities for anatomy-driven exploration of IMS data. One example is the automated anatomical interpretation of ion images, where empirically measured ion distributions are automatically decomposed into their underlying anatomical structures. While offering significant potential, IMS-atlas integration has thus far been restricted to the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas (AMBA) and mouse brain samples. Here, we expand the applicability of this framework by extending towards new animal species and a new set of anatomical atlases retrieved from the Scalable Brain Atlas (SBA). Furthermore, as many SBA atlases are based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, a new registration pipeline was developed that enables direct non-rigid IMS-to-MRI registration. These developments are demonstrated on protein-focused FTICR IMS measurements from coronal brain sections of a Parkinson's disease (PD) rat model. The measurements are integrated with an MRI-based rat brain atlas from the SBA. The new rat-focused IMS-atlas integration is used to perform automated anatomical interpretation and to find differential ions between healthy and diseased tissue. IMS-atlas integration can serve as an important accelerator in IMS data exploration, and with these new developments it can now be applied to a wider variety of animal species and modalities. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: MALDI Imaging, edited by Dr. Corinna Henkel and Prof. Peter Hoffmann.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical atlas; FTICR MS; Imaging mass spectrometry; MRI; Rat brain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28254588     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom        ISSN: 1570-9639            Impact factor:   3.036


  14 in total

1.  Automatic 3D Nonlinear Registration of Mass Spectrometry Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Walid M Abdelmoula; Michael S Regan; Begona G C Lopez; Elizabeth C Randall; Sean Lawler; Ann C Mladek; Michal O Nowicki; Bianca M Marin; Jeffrey N Agar; Kristin R Swanson; Tina Kapur; Jann N Sarkaria; William Wells; Nathalie Y R Agar
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Spatial Segmentation of Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data by Combining Multivariate Clustering and Univariate Thresholding.

Authors:  Hang Hu; Ruichuan Yin; Hilary M Brown; Julia Laskin
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Towards Differential Connectomics with NeuroVIISAS.

Authors:  Sebastian Schwanke; Jörg Jenssen; Peter Eipert; Oliver Schmitt
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2019-01

Review 4.  Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Nico Verbeeck; Richard M Caprioli; Raf Van de Plas
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 10.946

Review 5.  Mass Spectrometry Imaging: A Review of Emerging Advancements and Future Insights.

Authors:  Amanda Rae Buchberger; Kellen DeLaney; Jillian Johnson; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Integrated molecular imaging technologies for investigation of metals in biological systems: A brief review.

Authors:  William J Perry; Andy Weiss; Raf Van de Plas; Jeffrey M Spraggins; Richard M Caprioli; Eric P Skaar
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Fibroblasts: Promise and Challenge.

Authors:  Peggi M Angel; Denys Rujchanarong; Sarah Pippin; Laura Spruill; Richard Drake
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 4.250

Review 8.  Multimodal Imaging Mass Spectrometry: Next Generation Molecular Mapping in Biology and Medicine.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Neumann; Katerina V Djambazova; Richard M Caprioli; Jeffrey M Spraggins
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.262

9.  Fourier Transform Infrared Microscopy Enables Guidance of Automated Mass Spectrometry Imaging to Predefined Tissue Morphologies.

Authors:  Jan-Hinrich Rabe; Denis A Sammour; Sandra Schulz; Bogdan Munteanu; Martina Ott; Katharina Ochs; Peter Hohenberger; Alexander Marx; Michael Platten; Christiane A Opitz; Daniel S Ory; Carsten Hopf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Yale School of Public Health Symposium on tissue imaging mass spectrometry: illuminating phenotypic heterogeneity and drug disposition at the molecular level.

Authors:  Georgia Charkoftaki; Nicholas J W Rattray; Per E Andrén; Richard M Caprioli; Steve Castellino; Mark W Duncan; Richard J A Goodwin; Kevin L Schey; Sheerin K Shahidi-Latham; Kirill A Veselkov; Caroline H Johnson; Vasilis Vasiliou
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.