Lale Dinç Asarcıklı1, Mehmet Kış2, Tolga Sinan Güvenç3, Veysel Tosun4, Burak Acar5, Fulya Avcı Demir6, Abdulrahman Naser7, Mehdi Zoghi8. 1. Department of Cardiology, Dr. Siyami Ersek Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Silopi State Hospital, Sirnak, Turkey. 3. Faculty of Medicine, Division of Internal Medical Sciences, Department of Cardiology, Kirklareli University, Kirklareli, Turkey. 4. Department of Cardiology, Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey. 5. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey. 6. Elmali State Hospital, Antalya, Turkey. 7. Department of Cardiology, VM Medical Park Pendik Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 8. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Friedewald equation (LDL-Cf) is known to produce inaccurate estimations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) when triglycerides are high (>400 mg/dL) or LDL-C is low (<70 mg/dL). The Martin/Hopkins (LDL-Cmh) and Sampson (LDL-Cs) equations were developed to overcome these limitations, but few data are available to assess whether these equations offer incremental usefulness over LDL-Cf. Our aim was to understand whether there was any incremental usefulness of novel equations on decisions regarding patient management. METHODS: Four thousand one hundred and ninety-six cardiology patients who were included in a multicentre registry database were analysed. Each patient was assigned to a cardiovascular risk class using the SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) algorithm, and relevant European guidelines were used to assess LDL-C targets. RESULTS: Compared with LDL-Cmh and LDL-Cs, LDL-Cf was able to correctly identify 96.9%-98.08% of patients as within or outside the LDL-C target, respectively, and 1.95%-2.8% of patients were falsely identified as being within the LDL-C target. Kappa coefficients for agreement between LDL-Cf vs LDL-Cmh and LDL-Cf vs LDL-Cs were 0.868 and 0.918 (P < .001). For patients not on cholesterol-lowering drugs, the decision to initiate treatment would be different in 1.2%-1.8% of cases if LDL-Cs or LDL-Cmh were used, respectively. For those already on cholesterol-lowering drugs, decisions regarding treatment intensification would be different in 1.5%-2.4% of cases if LDL-Cs or LDL-Cmh were used. CONCLUSIONS: In most cardiology outpatients, the Friedewald equation has excellent agreement with the novel Martin/Hopkins and Sampson equations, and treatment decisions should not change in most patients.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Friedewald equation (LDL-Cf) is known to produce inaccurate estimations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) when triglycerides are high (>400 mg/dL) or LDL-C is low (<70 mg/dL). The Martin/Hopkins (LDL-Cmh) and Sampson (LDL-Cs) equations were developed to overcome these limitations, but few data are available to assess whether these equations offer incremental usefulness over LDL-Cf. Our aim was to understand whether there was any incremental usefulness of novel equations on decisions regarding patient management. METHODS: Four thousand one hundred and ninety-six cardiology patients who were included in a multicentre registry database were analysed. Each patient was assigned to a cardiovascular risk class using the SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) algorithm, and relevant European guidelines were used to assess LDL-C targets. RESULTS: Compared with LDL-Cmh and LDL-Cs, LDL-Cf was able to correctly identify 96.9%-98.08% of patients as within or outside the LDL-C target, respectively, and 1.95%-2.8% of patients were falsely identified as being within the LDL-C target. Kappa coefficients for agreement between LDL-Cf vs LDL-Cmh and LDL-Cf vs LDL-Cs were 0.868 and 0.918 (P < .001). For patients not on cholesterol-lowering drugs, the decision to initiate treatment would be different in 1.2%-1.8% of cases if LDL-Cs or LDL-Cmh were used, respectively. For those already on cholesterol-lowering drugs, decisions regarding treatment intensification would be different in 1.5%-2.4% of cases if LDL-Cs or LDL-Cmh were used. CONCLUSIONS: In most cardiology outpatients, the Friedewald equation has excellent agreement with the novel Martin/Hopkins and Sampson equations, and treatment decisions should not change in most patients.