Ahmed Bedir1, Semaw Ferede Abera1, Ljupcho Efremov1,2, Lamiaa Hassan2, Dirk Vordermark1,3, Daniel Medenwald4,5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Services Research Group, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. 2. Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometry, and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Strasse 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Services Research Group, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. Daniel.Medenwald@uk-halle.de. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. Daniel.Medenwald@uk-halle.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite recent improvements in cancer treatment in Germany, a marked difference in cancer survival based on socioeconomic factors persists. We aim to quantify the effect of socioeconomic inequality on head and neck cancer (HNC) survival. METHODS: Information on 20,821 HNC patients diagnosed in 2009-2013 was routinely collected by German population-based cancer registries. Socioeconomic inequality was defined by the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation. The Cox proportional regression and relative survival analysis measured the survival disparity according to level of socioeconomic deprivation with respective confidence intervals (CI). A causal mediation analysis was conducted to quantify the effect of socioeconomic deprivation mediated through medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment on HNC survival. RESULTS: The most socioeconomically deprived patients were found to have the highest hazard of dying when compared to the most affluent (Hazard Ratio: 1.25, 95% CI 1.17-1.34). The most deprived patients also had the worst 5-year age-adjusted relative survival (50.8%, 95% CI 48.5-53.0). Our mediation analysis showed that most of the effect of deprivation on survival was mediated through differential stage at diagnosis during the first 6 months after HNC diagnosis. As follow-up time increased, medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment played no role in mediating the effect of deprivation on survival. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the survival disparity between affluent and deprived HNC patients in Germany. Considering data limitations, our results suggest that, within six months after HNC diagnosis, the elimination of differences in stage at diagnosis could reduce survival inequalities.
PURPOSE: Despite recent improvements in cancer treatment in Germany, a marked difference in cancer survival based on socioeconomic factors persists. We aim to quantify the effect of socioeconomic inequality on head and neck cancer (HNC) survival. METHODS: Information on 20,821 HNC patients diagnosed in 2009-2013 was routinely collected by German population-based cancer registries. Socioeconomic inequality was defined by the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation. The Cox proportional regression and relative survival analysis measured the survival disparity according to level of socioeconomic deprivation with respective confidence intervals (CI). A causal mediation analysis was conducted to quantify the effect of socioeconomic deprivation mediated through medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment on HNC survival. RESULTS: The most socioeconomically deprived patients were found to have the highest hazard of dying when compared to the most affluent (Hazard Ratio: 1.25, 95% CI 1.17-1.34). The most deprived patients also had the worst 5-year age-adjusted relative survival (50.8%, 95% CI 48.5-53.0). Our mediation analysis showed that most of the effect of deprivation on survival was mediated through differential stage at diagnosis during the first 6 months after HNC diagnosis. As follow-up time increased, medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment played no role in mediating the effect of deprivation on survival. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the survival disparity between affluent and deprived HNC patients in Germany. Considering data limitations, our results suggest that, within six months after HNC diagnosis, the elimination of differences in stage at diagnosis could reduce survival inequalities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Causality; Head and neck cancer; Mediation analysis; Socioeconomic deprivation; Survival
Authors: K Kian Ang; Jonathan Harris; Richard Wheeler; Randal Weber; David I Rosenthal; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân; William H Westra; Christine H Chung; Richard C Jordan; Charles Lu; Harold Kim; Rita Axelrod; C Craig Silverman; Kevin P Redmond; Maura L Gillison Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A F Boing; J L Ferreira Antunes; M Brasilino de Carvalho; J Francisco de Góis Filho; L P Kowalski; P Michaluart; J Eluf-Neto; P Boffetta; V Wünsch-Filho Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: E Hiripi; A Gondos; K Emrich; B Holleczek; A Katalinic; S Luttmann; E Sirri; H Brenner Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Seung Hee Choi; Jeffrey E Terrell; Karen E Fowler; Scott A McLean; Tamer Ghanem; Gregory T Wolf; Carol R Bradford; Jeremy Taylor; Sonia A Duffy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 3.240