Literature DB >> 33568520

Loss of TGFβ signaling increases alternative end-joining DNA repair that sensitizes to genotoxic therapies across cancer types.

Qi Liu1, Luis Palomero2, Jade Moore1, Ines Guix1, Roderic Espín2, Alvaro Aytés2, Jian-Hua Mao3, Amanda G Paulovich4, Jeffrey R Whiteaker4, Richard G Ivey4, George Iliakis5, Daxian Luo5, Anthony J Chalmers6, John Murnane1, Miquel Angel Pujana7, Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff8.   

Abstract

Among the pleotropic roles of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) signaling in cancer, its impact on genomic stability is least understood. Inhibition of TGFβ signaling increases use of alternative end joining (alt-EJ), an error-prone DNA repair process that typically functions as a "backup" pathway if double-strand break repair by homologous recombination or nonhomologous end joining is compromised. However, the consequences of this functional relationship on therapeutic vulnerability in human cancer remain unknown. Here, we show that TGFβ broadly controls the DNA damage response and suppresses alt-EJ genes that are associated with genomic instability. Mechanistically based TGFβ and alt-EJ gene expression signatures were anticorrelated in glioblastoma, squamous cell lung cancer, and serous ovarian cancer. Consistent with error-prone repair, more of the genome was altered in tumors classified as low TGFβ and high alt-EJ, and the corresponding patients had better outcomes. Pan-cancer analysis of solid neoplasms revealed that alt-EJ genes were coordinately expressed and anticorrelated with TGFβ competency in 16 of 17 cancer types tested. Moreover, regardless of cancer type, tumors classified as low TGFβ and high alt-EJ were characterized by an insertion-deletion mutation signature containing short microhomologies and were more sensitive to genotoxic therapy. Collectively, experimental studies revealed that loss or inhibition of TGFβ signaling compromises the DNA damage response, resulting in ineffective repair by alt-EJ. Translation of this mechanistic relationship into gene expression signatures identified a robust anticorrelation that predicts response to genotoxic therapies, thereby expanding the potential therapeutic scope of TGFβ biology.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33568520      PMCID: PMC8208885          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc4465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  82 in total

Review 1.  Alternative end-joining repair pathways are the ultimate backup for abrogated classical non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination repair: Implications for the formation of chromosome translocations.

Authors:  George Iliakis; Tamara Murmann; Aashish Soni
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.873

2.  Blockade of TGF-β signaling by the TGFβR-I kinase inhibitor LY2109761 enhances radiation response and prolongs survival in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mengxian Zhang; Susanne Kleber; Manuel Röhrich; Carmen Timke; Na Han; Jochen Tuettenberg; Ana Martin-Villalba; Juergen Debus; Peter Peschke; Ute Wirkner; Michael Lahn; Peter E Huber
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Effect of collision energy optimization on the measurement of peptides by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Brendan Maclean; Daniela M Tomazela; Susan E Abbatiello; Shucha Zhang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Amanda G Paulovich; Steven A Carr; Michael J Maccoss
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  A TGFβ-miR-182-BRCA1 axis controls the mammary differentiation hierarchy.

Authors:  Haydeliz Martinez-Ruiz; Irineu Illa-Bochaca; Coral Omene; Douglas Hanniford; Qi Liu; Eva Hernando; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 8.192

5.  Microhomology-mediated End Joining and Homologous Recombination share the initial end resection step to repair DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Lan N Truong; Yongjiang Li; Linda Z Shi; Patty Yi-Hwa Hwang; Jing He; Hailong Wang; Niema Razavian; Michael W Berns; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking.

Authors:  Matthew D Wilkerson; D Neil Hayes
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 7.  DNA polymerase θ (POLQ), double-strand break repair, and cancer.

Authors:  Richard D Wood; Sylvie Doublié
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-14

8.  DNA damage response factors from diverse pathways, including DNA crosslink repair, mediate alternative end joining.

Authors:  Sean M Howard; Diana A Yanez; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  PARADIGM-2: Two parallel phase I studies of olaparib and radiotherapy or olaparib and radiotherapy plus temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, with treatment stratified by MGMT status.

Authors:  Ben Fulton; Susan C Short; Allan James; Stefan Nowicki; Catherine McBain; Sarah Jefferies; Caroline Kelly; Jon Stobo; Anna Morris; Aoife Williamson; Anthony J Chalmers
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-21

10.  Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair.

Authors:  Nicole Bennardo; Anita Cheng; Nick Huang; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 6.020

View more
  7 in total

1.  Detection of Alternative End-Joining in HNSC Cell Lines Using DNA Double-Strand Break Reporter Assays.

Authors:  Nan Zuo; Lin Ma; Weitao Hu; Yongqiang Deng; Lanlan Wei; Qi Liu
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2022-09-05

2.  Validation of Anticorrelated TGFβ Signaling and Alternative End-Joining DNA Repair Signatures that Predict Response to Genotoxic Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Ines Guix; Qi Liu; Miquel Angel Pujana; Patrick Ha; Josep Piulats; Isabel Linares; Ferran Guedea; Jian-Hua Mao; Ann Lazar; Jocelyn Chapman; Sue S Yom; Alan Ashworth; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 3.  Exploiting Canonical TGFβ Signaling in Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Genwen Chen; Jade Moore; Ines Guix; Dimitris Placantonakis; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 6.009

Review 4.  Mechanism, cellular functions and cancer roles of polymerase-theta-mediated DNA end joining.

Authors:  Dale A Ramsden; Juan Carvajal-Garcia; Gaorav P Gupta
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 5.  DNA End Joining: G0-ing to the Core.

Authors:  Richard L Frock; Cheyenne Sadeghi; Jodie Meng; Jing L Wang
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-10-09

Review 6.  Role of EMT in the DNA damage response, double-strand break repair pathway choice and its implications in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Caroline Moyret-Lalle; Mélanie K Prodhomme; Delphine Burlet; Ayaka Kashiwagi; Virginie Petrilli; Alain Puisieux; Hiroyuki Seimiya; Agnès Tissier
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.518

7.  Editorial: Cell Signaling Mediating Critical Radiation Responses.

Authors:  Carsten Herskind; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.