Literature DB >> 21090646

Effect of collision energy optimization on the measurement of peptides by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry.

Brendan Maclean1, Daniela M Tomazela, Susan E Abbatiello, Shucha Zhang, Jeffrey R Whiteaker, Amanda G Paulovich, Steven A Carr, Michael J Maccoss.   

Abstract

Proteomics experiments based on Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM, also referred to as Multiple Reaction Monitoring or MRM) are being used to target large numbers of protein candidates in complex mixtures. At present, instrument parameters are often optimized for each peptide, a time and resource intensive process. Large SRM experiments are greatly facilitated by having the ability to predict MS instrument parameters that work well with the broad diversity of peptides they target. For this reason, we investigated the impact of using simple linear equations to predict the collision energy (CE) on peptide signal intensity and compared it with the empirical optimization of the CE for each peptide and transition individually. Using optimized linear equations, the difference between predicted and empirically derived CE values was found to be an average gain of only 7.8% of total peak area. We also found that existing commonly used linear equations fall short of their potential, and should be recalculated for each charge state and when introducing new instrument platforms. We provide a fully automated pipeline for calculating these equations and individually optimizing CE of each transition on SRM instruments from Agilent, Applied Biosystems, Thermo-Scientific and Waters in the open source Skyline software tool ( http://proteome.gs.washington.edu/software/skyline ).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21090646      PMCID: PMC3005404          DOI: 10.1021/ac102179j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  22 in total

1.  Bioanalytical method validation--a revisit with a decade of progress.

Authors:  V P Shah; K K Midha; J W Findlay; H M Hill; J D Hulse; I J McGilveray; G McKay; K J Miller; R N Patnaik; M L Powell; A Tonelli; C T Viswanathan; A Yacobi
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Evaluation and optimization of ion-current ratio measurements by selected-ion-monitoring mass spectrometry.

Authors:  M J MacCoss; M J Toth; D E Matthews
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Similarity among tandem mass spectra from proteomic experiments: detection, significance, and utility.

Authors:  David L Tabb; Michael J MacCoss; Christine C Wu; Scott D Anderson; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification.

Authors:  S E Stein; D R Scott
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma.

Authors:  Terri A Addona; Susan E Abbatiello; Birgit Schilling; Steven J Skates; D R Mani; David M Bunk; Clifford H Spiegelman; Lisa J Zimmerman; Amy-Joan L Ham; Hasmik Keshishian; Steven C Hall; Simon Allen; Ronald K Blackman; Christoph H Borchers; Charles Buck; Helene L Cardasis; Michael P Cusack; Nathan G Dodder; Bradford W Gibson; Jason M Held; Tara Hiltke; Angela Jackson; Eric B Johansen; Christopher R Kinsinger; Jing Li; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A Neubert; Richard K Niles; Trenton C Pulsipher; David Ransohoff; Henry Rodriguez; Paul A Rudnick; Derek Smith; David L Tabb; Tony J Tegeler; Asokan M Variyath; Lorenzo J Vega-Montoto; Asa Wahlander; Sofia Waldemarson; Mu Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lei Zhao; N Leigh Anderson; Susan J Fisher; Daniel C Liebler; Amanda G Paulovich; Fred E Regnier; Paul Tempst; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  High-speed liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of drugs in biological samples.

Authors:  T R Covey; E D Lee; J D Henion
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Metabolic kinetics and quantitative analysis by isotope dilution thermospray LC/MS.

Authors:  A L Yergey; N V Esteban; D J Liberato
Journal:  Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom       Date:  1987-11

8.  Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics.

Authors:  Paola Picotti; Bernd Bodenmiller; Lukas N Mueller; Bruno Domon; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Quantification of cardiovascular biomarkers in patient plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution.

Authors:  Hasmik Keshishian; Terri Addona; Michael Burgess; D R Mani; Xu Shi; Eric Kuhn; Marc S Sabatine; Robert E Gerszten; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Rapid determination of methandrostenolone in equine urine by isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  O Edlund; L Bowers; J Henion; T R Covey
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1989-12-29
View more
  84 in total

1.  Relative quantification of serum proteins from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Angela Y Wehr; Wei-Ting Hwang; Ian A Blair; Kenneth H Yu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Analysis of host-cell proteins in biotherapeutic proteins by comprehensive online two-dimensional liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Catalin E Doneanu; Alex Xenopoulos; Keith Fadgen; Jim Murphy; St John Skilton; Holly Prentice; Martha Stapels; Weibin Chen
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 3.  Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions.

Authors:  Paola Picotti; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 4.  Replacing immunoassays with tryptic digestion-peptide immunoaffinity enrichment and LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Jessica O Becker; Andrew N Hoofnagle
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Nano-scale liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and on-the-fly orthogonal array optimization for quantification of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and the application in preclinical analysis.

Authors:  Xiaotao Duan; Lipeng Dai; Shang-Chiung Chen; Joseph P Balthasar; Jun Qu
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification.

Authors:  Nathan P Manes; Jessica M Mann; Aleksandra Nita-Lazar
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Establishing ion ratio thresholds based on absolute peak area for absolute protein quantification using protein cleavage isotope dilution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Philip L Loziuk; Ronald R Sederoff; Vincent L Chiang; David C Muddiman
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.616

8.  Drift time-specific collision energies enable deep-coverage data-independent acquisition proteomics.

Authors:  Ute Distler; Jörg Kuharev; Pedro Navarro; Yishai Levin; Hansjörg Schild; Stefan Tenzer
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  A mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of Homer2-interacting proteins in the mouse brain.

Authors:  Scott P Goulding; Karen K Szumlinski; Candice Contet; Michael J MacCoss; Christine C Wu
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Peptide dimethylation: fragmentation control via distancing the dimethylamino group.

Authors:  Adam J McShane; Yuanyuan Shen; Mary Joan Castillo; Xudong Yao
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.