John M Abrahams1,2,3, Christopher Sagar4, Mark Rickman4,5,6. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. john.abrahams@sa.gov.au. 2. Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Faculty of Health Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. john.abrahams@sa.gov.au. 3. Centre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research (COTR), Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. john.abrahams@sa.gov.au. 4. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 5. Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Faculty of Health Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 6. Centre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research (COTR), Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the fourth largest metropolitan population density, motor vehicle drivers in Adelaide, South Australia, record the most number of motor vehicle insurance claims in Australia. Previous studies have shown a rise in cycling-related emergency department presentations from 2005 to 2010. There is no specific data available specifically related to South Australia. Our institution is the largest level 1 trauma centre in South Australia and Northern Territory and has a local geographic pool of the central metropolitan region of Adelaide. The aims of this study were to establish the demographics of cycling-related presentations to our institution that involved the admission of a patient under the Orthopaedic and Trauma service. Secondary aims were to investigate whether there were any common variables among these presentations that could be modified to prevent or reduce the morbidity of cycling-related trauma. METHODS: A prospective study was performed at our institution from 1 March 2018 until 31 December 2019 of all inpatient admissions under the Orthopaedics and Trauma department, where the patient was injured as a cyclist. We collated patient-reported information about the accident and their cycling habits. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients were included in the study. One hundred and thirty-one injuries were recorded, requiring 89 surgical procedures. Eighty were upper limb injuries (61%), 49 were lower limb (37%), and 2 injuries occurred in either the spine or ribs. The most common reason for the accident was excessive cyclist speed. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of cyclists admitted to our unit with orthopaedic injuries were male patients who assessed themselves as experienced riders, and yet still were involved in accidents that resulted predominantly from episodes of poor judgement. Speed is a common and avoidable factor involved in the presentation of orthopaedic-related trauma to the public system. Involvement of other vehicles was relatively uncommon, as was poor weather; upper limb injuries predominate in this group.
BACKGROUND: With the fourth largest metropolitan population density, motor vehicle drivers in Adelaide, South Australia, record the most number of motor vehicle insurance claims in Australia. Previous studies have shown a rise in cycling-related emergency department presentations from 2005 to 2010. There is no specific data available specifically related to South Australia. Our institution is the largest level 1 trauma centre in South Australia and Northern Territory and has a local geographic pool of the central metropolitan region of Adelaide. The aims of this study were to establish the demographics of cycling-related presentations to our institution that involved the admission of a patient under the Orthopaedic and Trauma service. Secondary aims were to investigate whether there were any common variables among these presentations that could be modified to prevent or reduce the morbidity of cycling-related trauma. METHODS: A prospective study was performed at our institution from 1 March 2018 until 31 December 2019 of all inpatient admissions under the Orthopaedics and Trauma department, where the patient was injured as a cyclist. We collated patient-reported information about the accident and their cycling habits. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients were included in the study. One hundred and thirty-one injuries were recorded, requiring 89 surgical procedures. Eighty were upper limb injuries (61%), 49 were lower limb (37%), and 2 injuries occurred in either the spine or ribs. The most common reason for the accident was excessive cyclist speed. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of cyclists admitted to our unit with orthopaedic injuries were male patients who assessed themselves as experienced riders, and yet still were involved in accidents that resulted predominantly from episodes of poor judgement. Speed is a common and avoidable factor involved in the presentation of orthopaedic-related trauma to the public system. Involvement of other vehicles was relatively uncommon, as was poor weather; upper limb injuries predominate in this group.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bicycle; Cycling; Level one trauma; Orthopaedic surgery; Public safety; Road safety; Trauma
Authors: P Oja; S Titze; A Bauman; B de Geus; P Krenn; B Reger-Nash; T Kohlberger Journal: Scand J Med Sci Sports Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Niels Christian Møller; Lars Østergaard; Jens Raaberg Gade; Jeppe Lund Nielsen; Lars Bo Andersen Journal: Prev Med Date: 2011-06-25 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Christopher Fenelon; Evelyn P Murphy; Colum Downey; Brendan J O'Daly; Michael Leonard Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2018-11-11 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Ben Beck; Mark Stevenson; Stuart Newstead; Peter Cameron; Rodney Judson; Elton R Edwards; Andrew Bucknill; Marilyn Johnson; Belinda Gabbe Journal: Accid Anal Prev Date: 2016-08-18