Masanao Kataoka1, Hiroshi Fujita2, Hiroaki Hara3, Hideto Harada1, Yuki Okutani1, Yoshiki Murotani1. 1. Institute for Joint Replacement, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Yamada-hirao-cho 17, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan. 2. Institute for Joint Replacement, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Yamada-hirao-cho 17, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan. hfshoot@gmail.com. 3. Department of Rehabilitation, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Yamada-hirao-cho 17, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In our institute, all elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fracture were treated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) using the modified Dall approach. To our knowledge, there are no reports on the knot position of the greater trochanter reattachment. The aim of this study was to determine influence of two knot positions (anterior or posterior) on the complications of the greater trochanter. METHODS: This is a prospective non-randomized study conducted on 95 elderly patients (95 hips) from September 2013 to December 2017. The knot position was changed from anterior to posterior alternately. The X-ray images obtained immediately after the operation were compared with those obtained at 3 months postoperatively; thereafter, the status of the greater trochanter was classified into three types: type A, no apparent shifting and fracture; type C, over 1-mm shifting of the fragment; and type F, fracture of the greater trochanter. RESULTS: Regarding age at operation, sex, BMI, size of the greater trochanteric fragment, stem type, and surgeon, there was no significant difference between two groups. In the anterior group, 34 hips (72.3%), 5 hips (10.6%), and 8 hips (17.0%) were classified under type A, C, and F, respectively. In the posterior group, 44 hips (91.7%), 1 hip (2.1%), and 3 hips (6.3%) were classified under type A, C, and F, respectively. There were significantly fewer greater trochanteric complications in the posterior group. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior knot position improved the union of the greater trochanter after BHA compared with the anterior knot position. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We had approved IRB at our hospital clinical research review committee. Retrospectively registered.
BACKGROUND: In our institute, all elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fracture were treated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) using the modified Dall approach. To our knowledge, there are no reports on the knot position of the greater trochanter reattachment. The aim of this study was to determine influence of two knot positions (anterior or posterior) on the complications of the greater trochanter. METHODS: This is a prospective non-randomized study conducted on 95 elderly patients (95 hips) from September 2013 to December 2017. The knot position was changed from anterior to posterior alternately. The X-ray images obtained immediately after the operation were compared with those obtained at 3 months postoperatively; thereafter, the status of the greater trochanter was classified into three types: type A, no apparent shifting and fracture; type C, over 1-mm shifting of the fragment; and type F, fracture of the greater trochanter. RESULTS: Regarding age at operation, sex, BMI, size of the greater trochanteric fragment, stem type, and surgeon, there was no significant difference between two groups. In the anterior group, 34 hips (72.3%), 5 hips (10.6%), and 8 hips (17.0%) were classified under type A, C, and F, respectively. In the posterior group, 44 hips (91.7%), 1 hip (2.1%), and 3 hips (6.3%) were classified under type A, C, and F, respectively. There were significantly fewer greater trochanteric complications in the posterior group. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior knot position improved the union of the greater trochanter after BHA compared with the anterior knot position. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We had approved IRB at our hospital clinical research review committee. Retrospectively registered.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bipolar hemiarthroplasty; Complications of the greater trochanter; Knot position; Modified Dall approach
Authors: Max P L van der Sijp; Danny van Delft; Pieta Krijnen; Arthur H P Niggebrugge; Inger B Schipper Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 4.757