Literature DB >> 33568071

The influence of QTL allelic diversity on QTL detection in multi-parent populations: a simulation study in sugar beet.

Vincent Garin1, Valentin Wimmer2, Dietrich Borchardt2, Marcos Malosetti3, Fred van Eeuwijk3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multi-parent populations (MPPs) are important resources for studying plant genetic architecture and detecting quantitative trait loci (QTLs). In MPPs, the QTL effects can show various levels of allelic diversity, which can be an important factor influencing the detection of QTLs. In MPPs, the allelic effects can be more or less specific. They can depend on an ancestor, a parent or the combination of parents in a cross. In this paper, we evaluated the effect of QTL allelic diversity on the QTL detection power in MPPs.
RESULTS: We simulated: a) cross-specific QTLs; b) parental and ancestral QTLs; and c) bi-allelic QTLs. Inspired by a real application in sugar beet, we tested different MPP designs (diallel, chessboard, factorial, and NAM) derived from five or nine parents to explore the ability to sample genetic diversity and detect QTLs. Using a fixed total population size, the QTL detection power was larger in MPPs with fewer but larger crosses derived from a reduced number of parents. The use of a larger set of parents was useful to detect rare alleles with a large phenotypic effect. The benefit of using a larger set of parents was however conditioned on an increase of the total population size. We also determined empirical confidence intervals for QTL location to compare the resolution of different designs. For QTLs representing 6% of the phenotypic variation, using 1600 F2 offspring individuals, we found average 95% confidence intervals over different designs of 49 and 25 cM for cross-specific and bi-allelic QTLs, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: MPPs derived from less parents with few but large crosses generally increased the QTL detection power. Using a larger set of parents to cover a wider genetic diversity can be useful to detect QTLs with a reduced minor allele frequency when the QTL effect is large and when the total population size is increased.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allelic diversity; Multi-parent populations (MPPs); Quantitative trait locus (QTL); R package mppR; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33568071      PMCID: PMC7860181          DOI: 10.1186/s12863-021-00960-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genom Data        ISSN: 2730-6844


  21 in total

1.  Optimal sampling of a population to determine QTL location, variance, and allelic number.

Authors:  Xiao-Lin Wu; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Estimating allelic number and identity in state of QTLs in interconnected families.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Jannink; Xiao-Lin Wu
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize.

Authors:  Jianming Yu; James B Holland; Michael D McMullen; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Simulating the collaborative cross: power of quantitative trait loci detection and mapping resolution in large sets of recombinant inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  William Valdar; Jonathan Flint; Richard Mott
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Combining different line crosses for mapping quantitative trait loci using the identical by descent-based variance component method.

Authors:  C Xie; D D Gessler; S Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mapping quantitative trait loci using multiple families of line crosses.

Authors:  S Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Optimum design of family structure and allocation of resources in association mapping with lines from multiple crosses.

Authors:  W Liu; H P Maurer; J C Reif; A E Melchinger; H F Utz; M R Tucker; N Ranc; G Della Porta; T Würschum
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Intraspecific variation of recombination rate in maize.

Authors:  Eva Bauer; Matthieu Falque; Hildrun Walter; Cyril Bauland; Christian Camisan; Laura Campo; Nina Meyer; Nicolas Ranc; Renaud Rincent; Wolfgang Schipprack; Thomas Altmann; Pascal Flament; Albrecht E Melchinger; Monica Menz; Jesús Moreno-González; Milena Ouzunova; Pedro Revilla; Alain Charcosset; Olivier C Martin; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  How do the type of QTL effect and the form of the residual term influence QTL detection in multi-parent populations? A case study in the maize EU-NAM population.

Authors:  Vincent Garin; Valentin Wimmer; Sofiane Mezmouk; Marcos Malosetti; Fred van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Comparison of statistical models for nested association mapping in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) through computer simulations.

Authors:  Jinquan Li; Anja Bus; Viola Spamer; Benjamin Stich
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  3 in total

1.  Physical Mapping of QTL in Four Spring Wheat Populations under Conventional and Organic Management Systems. I. Earliness.

Authors:  Kassa Semagn; Muhammad Iqbal; Hua Chen; Enid Perez-Lara; Darcy H Bemister; Rongrong Xiang; Jun Zou; Muhammad Asif; Atif Kamran; Amidou N'Diaye; Harpinder Randhawa; Curtis Pozniak; Dean Spaner
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23

2.  Multiallelic models for QTL mapping in diverse polyploid populations.

Authors:  Alejandro Thérèse Navarro; Giorgio Tumino; Roeland E Voorrips; Paul Arens; Marinus J M Smulders; Eric van de Weg; Chris Maliepaard
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Analysis of historical selection in winter wheat.

Authors:  Chin Jian Yang; Olufunmilayo Ladejobi; Richard Mott; Wayne Powell; Ian Mackay
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.574

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.