Literature DB >> 14740089

Optimal sampling of a population to determine QTL location, variance, and allelic number.

Xiao-Lin Wu1, Jean-Luc Jannink.   

Abstract

In a population intended for breeding and selection, questions of interest relative to a specific segregating QTL are the variance it generates in the population, and the number and effects of its alleles. One approach to address these questions is to extract several inbreds from the population and use them to generate multiple mapping families. Given random sampling of parents, sampling strategy may be an important factor determining the power of the analysis and its accuracy in estimating QTL variance and allelic number. We describe appropriate multiple-family QTL mapping methodology and apply it to simulated data sets to determine optimal sampling strategies in terms of family number versus family size. Genomes were simulated with seven chromosomes, on which 107 markers and six QTL were distributed. The total heritability was 0.60. Two to ten alleles were segregating at each QTL. Sampling strategies ranged from sampling two inbreds and generating a single family of 600 progeny to sampling 40 inbreds and generating 40 families of 15 progeny each. Strategies involving only one to five families were subject to variation due to the sampling of inbred parents. For QTL where more than two alleles were segregating, these strategies did not sample QTL alleles representative of the original population. Conversely, strategies involving 30 or more parents were subject to variation due to sampling of QTL genotypes within the small families obtained. Given these constraints, greatest QTL detection power was obtained for strategies involving five to ten mapping families. The most accurate estimation of the variance generated by the QTL, however, was obtained with strategies involving 20 or more families. Finally, strategies with an intermediate number of families best estimated the number of QTL alleles. We conclude that no overall optimal sampling strategy exists but that the strategy adopted must depend on the objective.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14740089     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1569-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  11 in total

1.  Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci with one-dimensional genome searches.

Authors:  J L Jannink; R Jansen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  More about quantitative trait locus mapping with diallel designs.

Authors:  A Rebaï; B Goffinet
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  A general mixture model approach for mapping quantitative trait loci from diverse cross designs involving multiple inbred lines.

Authors:  Y Liu; Z B Zeng
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Strategies for genetic mapping of categorical traits.

Authors:  S Rao; L Xia
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Estimating allelic number and identity in state of QTLs in interconnected families.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Jannink; Xiao-Lin Wu
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Combining different line crosses for mapping quantitative trait loci using the identical by descent-based variance component method.

Authors:  C Xie; D D Gessler; S Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Mapping quantitative trait loci using multiple families of line crosses.

Authors:  S Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Bayesian mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci from incomplete inbred line cross data.

Authors:  M J Sillanpää; E Arjas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.

Authors:  E S Lander; D Botstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Comparison and integration of four barley genetic maps.

Authors:  X Qi; P Stam; P Lindhout
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.166

View more
  12 in total

1.  The relationship between parental genetic or phenotypic divergence and progeny variation in the maize nested association mapping population.

Authors:  H-Y Hung; C Browne; K Guill; N Coles; M Eller; A Garcia; N Lepak; S Melia-Hancock; M Oropeza-Rosas; S Salvo; N Upadyayula; E S Buckler; S Flint-Garcia; M D McMullen; T R Rocheford; J B Holland
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Choice of models for QTL mapping with multiple families and design of the training set for prediction of Fusarium resistance traits in maize.

Authors:  Sen Han; H Friedrich Utz; Wenxin Liu; Tobias A Schrag; Michael Stange; Tobias Würschum; Thomas Miedaner; Eva Bauer; Chris-Carolin Schön; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Power to detect higher-order epistatic interactions in a metabolic pathway using a new mapping strategy.

Authors:  Benjamin Stich; Jianming Yu; Albrecht E Melchinger; Hans-Peter Piepho; H Friedrich Utz; Hans P Maurer; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Overview of QTL detection in plants and tests for synergistic epistatic interactions.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Jannink; Laurence Moreau; Gilles Charmet; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  QTL mapping for combining ability in different population-based NCII designs: a simulation study.

Authors:  Lanzhi Li; Congwei Sun; Yuan Chen; Zhijun Dai; Zhen Qu; Xingfei Zheng; Sibin Yu; Tongmin Mou; Chenwu Xu; Zhongli Hu
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Bayesian model averaging for evaluation of candidate gene effects.

Authors:  Xiao-Lin Wu; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Bayesian joint mapping of quantitative trait loci for Gaussian and categorical characters in line crosses.

Authors:  Xiao-Lin Wu; Daniel Gianola; Kent Weigel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Genetic control of photoperiod sensitivity in maize revealed by joint multiple population analysis.

Authors:  Nathan D Coles; Michael D McMullen; Peter J Balint-Kurti; Richard C Pratt; James B Holland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium QTL mapping in multiple families of maize (Zea mays L.) line crosses highlights complementarities between models based on parental haplotype and single locus polymorphism.

Authors:  N Bardol; M Ventelon; B Mangin; S Jasson; V Loywick; F Couton; C Derue; P Blanchard; A Charcosset; Laurence Moreau
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Joint-multiple family linkage analysis predicts within-family variation better than single-family analysis of the maize nested association mapping population.

Authors:  F Ogut; Y Bian; P J Bradbury; J B Holland
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.