Literature DB >> 33567709

Surviving the Wildlife Trade in Southeast Asia: Reforming the 'Disposal' of Confiscated Live Animals under CITES.

Shannon N Rivera1, Andrew Knight1, Steven P McCulloch1.   

Abstract

Increased focus on the illegal global wildlife trade has resulted in greater numbers of live animals confiscated by authorities, increasing the need to manage these animals responsibly. Most wildlife seizures take place in Southeast Asia, with global demand for live animals fuelling much of the trafficking. Guidelines for the 'disposal' of live specimens are provided by the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), although individual Parties must implement provisions through national laws and regulations. 'Disposal' is the term used for the management of illegally traded wildlife upon confiscation. Confiscated live animals can be euthanised (i.e., killed), repatriated to their native country and released, or kept in captivity. This study investigates barriers to proper care and disposal of confiscated live animals in Southeast Asia, where roughly one quarter of the global multibillion dollar illegal wildlife trade takes place. Interviews were conducted with 18 professionals working within conservation, wildlife crime, and confiscated live animal management. Eight limitations to the proper care and disposal of confiscated wildlife were identified: (1) political will, (2) policy, (3) funding, (4) capacity, (5) expertise (6) attitudes and behaviours, (7) exploitation, and (8) corruption. Based on interviews, we propose seven key reforms to support the efficient and humane management of illegally traded wildlife for national authorities and CITES parties. These are wildlife seizure management, legislative support, enhanced political will, demand reduction, global participation, registry of rescue centres, and terminology change. This research highlights major barriers to the proper care and disposal of live confiscated animals and proposes key reforms to improve the conservation of threatened species and the welfare of millions of illegally traded animals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CITES; animal welfare; conservation; illegal wildlife trade; wildlife confiscations; wildlife disposal

Year:  2021        PMID: 33567709      PMCID: PMC7915825          DOI: 10.3390/ani11020439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  14 in total

Review 1.  Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method.

Authors:  Georgia J Mason
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

Review 3.  Global perspectives on animal welfare: Asia, the Far East, and Oceania.

Authors:  S A Rahman; L Walker; W Ricketts
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.181

4.  Can bans stimulate wildlife trade?

Authors:  Philippe Rivalan; Virginie Delmas; Elena Angulo; Leigh S Bull; Richard J Hall; Franck Courchamp; Alison M Rosser; Nigel Leader-Williams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Ecology. Reducing the risks of the wildlife trade.

Authors:  Katherine F Smith; Michael Behrens; Lisa M Schloegel; Nina Marano; Stas Burgiel; Peter Daszak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries.

Authors:  Francesca Moretti; Liesbeth van Vliet; Jozien Bensing; Giuseppe Deledda; Mariangela Mazzi; Michela Rimondini; Christa Zimmermann; Ian Fletcher
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-02-03

Review 7.  Conservation and the 4 Rs, which are rescue, rehabilitation, release, and research.

Authors:  Graham H Pyke; Judit K Szabo
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Rescued wildlife in China remains at risk.

Authors:  Zhao-Min Zhou; Chris Newman; Christina D Buesching; David W Macdonald; Youbing Zhou
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  The Visitor Effect on Zoo Animals: Implications and Opportunities for Zoo Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Sally L Sherwen; Paul H Hemsworth
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.