Literature DB >> 33563251

Shared decision making from reintegration professionals' perspectives to support return to work: a qualitative study.

Marloes Vooijs1, Nicole M C van Kesteren2, Astrid M Hazelzet2, Wilma Otten2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Work participation is an important determinant of public health; being unemployed leads to a decrease in an individual's health. In the Netherlands, people with a work disability can apply for disability benefits, in which people also receive support to return to work (RTW). A method, currently used in the medical sector, that can include both the perspective of the reintegration professional and of the individual in the process of RTW, is shared decision making (SDM). In this article we explore to what extent reintegration professionals currently use SDM, and to what extent they prefer to use SDM in their ideal interaction with clients.
METHODS: We performed semi-structured interviews with fourteen reintegration professionals from four different municipalities. The transcripts were coded according to content analysis, applying open and axial coding.
RESULTS: Reintegration professionals emphasised the importance of having a good relationship with clients, of building trust and collaborating as a team. They did not inform their clients that they could be part of the decision-making process, or discussed a shared goal. Although professionals did emphasise the importance of aligning their approach with the preferences of the client and though they tried to offer some choice options, they did not mention available options, discussed the pros and cons of these options or evaluated decisions with their clients. Furthermore, they did not mention any of these aspects in their ideal interaction with clients.
CONCLUSIONS: SDM has a potential value, because all professionals underline the importance of having an alliance with clients, collaborating as a team, and striving to align their approach with the preferences of the client. However, professionals currently perform a limited set of SDM steps. Additional knowledge and skills are needed for both reintegration professionals and municipalities so that professionals can consider and reflect on the value of using SDM, or SDM steps, in supporting RTW. Providing clients with knowledge and skills seems necessary to facilitate both self-management and SDM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; Employability; Employment; Evidence based; Patient participation; Return to work; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33563251      PMCID: PMC7874602          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10365-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  12 in total

Review 1.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; France Légaré; Krystina Lewis; Michael J Barry; Carol L Bennett; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; Richard Thomson; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-12

2.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 3.  Supported employment: assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Tina Marshall; Richard W Goldberg; Lisa Braude; Richard H Dougherty; Allen S Daniels; Sushmita Shoma Ghose; Preethy George; Miriam E Delphin-Rittmon
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Juan Pablo Brito; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Value of work for employees with a chronic disease.

Authors:  M Vooijs; M C J Leensen; J L Hoving; H Wind; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; A H Pieterse; J C J M De Haes
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-15

7.  Doctors' and patients' preferences for participation and treatment in curative prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Peep F M Stalmeier; Julia J van Tol-Geerdink; Emile N J Th van Lin; Erik Schimmel; Henk Huizenga; Willem A J van Daal; Jan-Willem Leer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review.

Authors:  S L Saunders; B Nedelec
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-03

9.  Perspectives of People with a Chronic Disease on Participating in Work: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Marloes Vooijs; Monique C J Leensen; Jan L Hoving; Haije Wind; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-12

10.  A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Marie Anne Durand; Julia Song; Johanna Aarts; Paul J Barr; Zackary Berger; Nan Cochran; Dominick Frosch; Dariusz Galasiński; Pål Gulbrandsen; Paul K J Han; Martin Härter; Paul Kinnersley; Amy Lloyd; Manish Mishra; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez; Isabelle Scholl; Kounosuke Tomori; Lyndal Trevena; Holly O Witteman; Trudy Van der Weijden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.