Literature DB >> 29301005

Value of work for employees with a chronic disease.

M Vooijs1, M C J Leensen1, J L Hoving1, H Wind1, M H W Frings-Dresen1.   

Abstract

Background: Most people with a chronic disease value participation in work. Knowledge is limited, however, as to what extent employees with a chronic disease value participating in work, and the main reasons for this. Limited research is available on which specific factors contribute to the perceived value of work. Aims: To evaluate main reasons for, and the extent to which employees with a chronic disease value participation in work, and factors which motivate or demotivate employees in work.
Methods: A survey of members of three large patient federations was performed. Respondents had a chronic disease and were of working age. The extent and reasons for valuing work were analysed using descriptive statistics; (de)motivating aspects were qualitatively analysed using specific software.
Results: The 1683 respondents valued work with an average of 8 on a scale from 1 to 10 (1: 'work is not at all important to me' and 10: 'work is extremely important to me'). Most frequent reported reasons for valuing work were the provision of income, social contact and the ability to contribute to society. Motivational aspects for work were being financially independent, having positive social contact with colleagues or clients and having the ability to contribute to society. In contrast, negative social contact, performing useless work and having little autonomy demotivated people. Conclusions: Employed people with a chronic disease generally value work, mainly because it makes them financially independent, provides social contact and enables them to contribute to society.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29301005     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqx178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  4 in total

1.  Effects of a training program for occupational health professionals on the cognitions and perceptions of workers: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariska de Wit; Bedra Horreh; Carel T J Hulshof; Haije Wind; Angela G E M de Boer
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.851

2.  Shared decision making from reintegration professionals' perspectives to support return to work: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marloes Vooijs; Nicole M C van Kesteren; Astrid M Hazelzet; Wilma Otten
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Work status and work ability of patients receiving kidney replacement therapy: results from a European survey.

Authors:  Rianne W de Jong; Edwin J Boezeman; Nicholas C Chesnaye; Frederike J Bemelman; Ziad A Massy; Kitty J Jager; Vianda S Stel; Angela G E M de Boer
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 7.186

4.  The Function of Occupational Activity for Health as Perceived by Chronically Ill People.

Authors:  Katarzyna Mariańczyk; Wojciech Otrębski; Karolina Krzysztofik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.