Literature DB >> 27045369

Early Weightbearing and Range of Motion Versus Non-Weightbearing and Immobilization After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Unstable Ankle Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Niloofar Dehghan1, Michael D McKee, Richard J Jenkinson, Emil H Schemitsch, Venessa Stas, Aaron Nauth, Jeremy A Hall, David J Stephen, Hans J Kreder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare early weightbearing and range of motion (ROM) to nonweightbearing and immobilization in a cast after surgical fixation of unstable ankle fractures.
DESIGN: Multicentre randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Two-level one trauma centers. PATIENTS: One hundred ten patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of an unstable ankle fracture were recruited and randomized. INTERVENTION: One of 2 rehabilitation protocols: (1) Early weightbearing (weightbearing and ROM at 2 weeks, Early WB) or (2) Late weightbearing (nonweightbearing and cast immobilization for 6 weeks, Late WB). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was time to return to work (RTW). Secondary outcome measures included: ankle ROM, SF-36 heath outcome scores, Olerud/Molander ankle function score, and rates of complications.
RESULTS: There was no difference in RTW. At 6 weeks postoperatively, patients in the Early WB group had significantly improved ankle ROM (41 vs. 29, P < 0.0001); Olerud/Molander ankle function scores (45 vs. 32, P = 0.0007), and SF-36 scores on both the physical (51 vs. 42, P = 0.008) and mental (66 vs. 54, P = 0.0008) components. There were no differences with regard to wound complications or infections and no cases of fixation failure or loss of reduction. Patients in the Late WB group had higher rates of planned/performed hardware removal due to plate irritation (19% vs. 2%, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Given the convenience for the patient, early improved functional outcome, and the lack of an increased complication rate, we recommend early postoperative weightbearing and ROM in patients with surgically treated ankle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27045369     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  20 in total

1.  The treatment options for posterior malleolar fractures in tibial spiral fractures.

Authors:  Jialiang Guo; Lei Liu; Zongyou Yang; Zhiyong Hou; Wei Chen; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Early versus delayed weight bearing after surgical fixation of distal femur fractures: a non-randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Paolo Consigliere; Efthymios Iliopoulos; Tamer Ads; Alex Trompeter
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-02

3.  Early Return to Daily Life through Immediate Weight-Bearing after Lateral Malleolar Fracture Surgery.

Authors:  Sang-June Lee; Youngrak Choi; Seongju Choi; Hoseong Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Fractures of the lateral malleolus - a retrospective before-and-after study of treatment and resource utilization following the implementation of a structured treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Emilia Möller Rydberg; Jonas Skoglund; Hampus Brezicka; Jan Ekelund; Mikael Sundfeldt; Michael Möller; David Wennergren
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Skin closure with surgical staples in ankle fractures: a safe and reliable method.

Authors:  Gautham Prabhakar; Travis S Bullock; Case W Martin; James C Ryan; John H Cabot; Ahmed A Makhani; Leah P Griffin; Kush Shah; Boris A Zelle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Outpatient Physical Therapy Use Following Tibial Fractures: A Retrospective Commercial Claims Analysis.

Authors:  Kevin H McLaughlin; Lisa M Reider; Renan C Castillo; James R Ficke; Joseph F Levy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-05-04

7.  Potential Benefits of Limited Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up After Surgical Treatment of Ankle Fractures.

Authors:  Lisa G M Friedman; Daniela Sanchez; Terri A Zachos; Andrew Marcantonio; Megan Audet; Heather Vallier; Brian Mullis; Adam Myers-White; Laurence Kempton; Jeffrey Watts; Daniel S Horwitz
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-05-11

8.  Compared to conventional physiotherapy, does the use of an ankle trainer device after Weber B ankle fracture operation improve outcome and shorten hospital stay? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marius Molund; Jan Hellesnes; Gøran Berdal; Bernt Stray Andreassen; Geir Stray Andreassen
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.477

9.  Use of cast immobilisation versus removable brace in adults with an ankle fracture: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Kearney; Rebecca McKeown; Helen Parsons; Aminul Haque; Nick Parsons; Henry Nwankwo; James Mason; Martin Underwood; Anthony C Redmond; Jaclyn Brown; Siobhan Kefford; Matthew Costa
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-07-05

10.  Early and mid-term results of transarticular external fixation in the treatment of supination-external rotation type IV equivalent ankle fractures.

Authors:  Bo-Hua Li; Shan-Xi Wang; Jun Li; Fu-Guo Huang; Zhou Xiang; Yue Fang; Gang Zhong; Min Yi; Xiao-Dan Zhao; Lei Liu
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.