Literature DB >> 33562536

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting by Patients in 12 European Countries.

Agne Valinciute-Jankauskiene1, Loreta Kubiliene1.   

Abstract

Patients who report suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) help minimize drug safety risks and bolster the pharmacovigilance system. The aim of this study was to examine the contribution of patients to pharmacovigilance and compare the tools used to promote patient reporting in European countries that implemented this reporting type in 2012-2013. A web-based questionnaire was sent to the national competent authorities (NCAs) of the European countries. The received answers were systematized and compared using statistical analysis. The performed statistical analysis demonstrated that changes in the number of received ADR reports increased significantly in each country during the analyzed period. These changes were significantly different in Ireland and Finland from those in the other reviewed countries. The common source of information on direct patient reporting was the country's NCA website. Other sources used were social media pages, leaflets, and posters. This is the first study on patient reporting schemes implemented after the significant reform of the European regulatory system for pharmacovigilance. However, some countries did not actively promote their patient reporting schemes. Our findings indicate that countries with minimal experience in pharmacovigilance systems that include direct patient reporting should organize comprehensive campaigns on ADR reporting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse drug reactions; direct reporting; pharmacovigilance; promoting

Year:  2021        PMID: 33562536      PMCID: PMC7915689          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  22 in total

1.  Attitudes to reporting adverse drug reactions in northern Sweden.

Authors:  M Bäckström; T Mjörndal; R Dahlqvist; T Nordkvist-Olsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Experiences with adverse drug reaction reporting by patients: an 11-country survey.

Authors:  Florence van Hunsel; Linda Härmark; Shanthi Pal; Sten Olsson; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elena Lopez-Gonzalez; Maria T Herdeiro; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Patient reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions: a review of published literature and international experience.

Authors:  A Blenkinsopp; P Wilkie; M Wang; P A Routledge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Attitude survey of adverse drug-reaction reporting by health care professionals across the European Union. The European Pharmacovigilance Research Group.

Authors:  K J Belton
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  The contribution of direct patient reported ADRs to drug safety signals in the Netherlands from 2010 to 2015.

Authors:  Florence van Hunsel; Susan de Waal; Linda Härmark
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients in the Netherlands: three years of experience.

Authors:  Joyce de Langen; Florence van Hunsel; Anneke Passier; Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Completeness of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Sent by General Practitioners to a Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Geneviève Durrieu; Julien Jacquot; Mathilde Mège; Emmanuelle Bondon-Guitton; Vanessa Rousseau; François Montastruc; Jean-Louis Montastruc
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review.

Authors:  Lorna Hazell; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.228

Review 10.  Post-marketing withdrawal of 462 medicinal products because of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review of the world literature.

Authors:  Igho J Onakpoya; Carl J Heneghan; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  3 in total

1.  The effect of clinical pharmacists' intervention in adverse drug reaction reporting: a retrospective analysis with a 9-year interrupted time series.

Authors:  Tianwei Lan; Hua Wang; Xin Li; Hang Yin; Dan Shao; Yueyao Jiang; Qian Yu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Adverse drug reaction reporting for more than a decade: The need for pharmacovigilance policy implementation in Turkey.

Authors:  Zakir Khan; Yusuf Karatas
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 3.  The Importance of Direct Patient Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the Safety Monitoring Process.

Authors:  Kamila Sienkiewicz; Monika Burzyńska; Izabela Rydlewska-Liszkowska; Jacek Sienkiewicz; Ewelina Gaszyńska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.