Literature DB >> 9342576

Attitude survey of adverse drug-reaction reporting by health care professionals across the European Union. The European Pharmacovigilance Research Group.

K J Belton1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This survey was conducted to assess the attitudes of medical practitioners in the European Union regarding their national spontaneous reporting scheme, to identify reasons for under-reporting and to determine what steps might be effective in increasing reporting rates. National spontaneous reporting schemes rely on health care professionals reporting individual cases of suspected ADRs to a central or regional agency. National schemes, however, vary considerably and reporting rates and patterns differ between member states. Accumulating evidence suggests that doctors' attitudes to national ADR reporting schemes are significant determinants of reporting rates.
METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire and letter of invitation was sent to a random sample of approximately 1% of medical practitioners in each of nine EU member states (Denmark, France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK). One month later, a reminder letter and a second copy of the questionnaire was sent to the non-responders (except Denmark and Italy).
RESULTS: Response rates, and the percentage of responders who stated that they had reported previously an ADR, varied substantially between countries. Issues that appeared to discourage reporting included lack of availability of report forms; the address or telephone number of the reporting agency; lack of information on how to report; and not having enough time to report. Issues which did not apparently discourage reporting included concern about patient confidentiality; fear of legal liability or appearing foolish; reluctance to admit that harm had been caused to a patient; and ambition to collect and publish a personal series of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey demonstrate some of the advantages and disadvantages of transnational, multilingual studies of this type, but indicate that there is scope for the further development of such techniques and their use on a wider basis in the EU and elsewhere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9342576     DOI: 10.1007/s002280050314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  77 in total

1.  Attitudinal survey of voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  I A Eland; K J Belton; A C van Grootheest; A P Meiners; M D Rawlins; B H Stricker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Spontaneous reporting--of what? Clinical concerns about drugs.

Authors:  I R Edwards
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Case-population studies in pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  Dolors Capellà; Consuelo Pedrós; Xavier Vidal; Joan-Ramon Laporte
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Attitudes and knowledge of hospital pharmacists to adverse drug reaction reporting.

Authors:  C F Green; D R Mottram; P H Rowe; M Pirmohamed
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in Cuba: integrating continuous education, training and research in a network approach.

Authors:  Frank Debesa; Giset Jiménez; Albert Figueras; Eduard Diogène; Julián Pérez Peña; Jenny Avila; Joan-Ramon Laporte
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Stimulating adverse drug reaction reporting: effect of a drug safety bulletin and of including yellow cards in prescription pads.

Authors:  Josep Maria Castel; Albert Figueras; Consuelo Pedrós; Joan-Ramon Laporte; Dolors Capellà
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Expectations for feedback in adverse drug reporting by healthcare professionals in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ingrid Oosterhuis; Florence P A M van Hunsel; Eugène P van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Community pharmacists' views on adverse drug reactions reporting in Malaysia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kang-Nee Ting; Dane Michael Stratton-Powell; Claire Anderson
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-03-25

9.  Obstacles and solutions for spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in the hospital.

Authors:  A Vallano; G Cereza; C Pedròs; A Agustí; I Danés; C Aguilera; J M Arnau
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Pharmacovigilance--Current and Future Challenges. Abstracts of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance annual conference. Dublin, Ireland, 6-8 October 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.