Literature DB >> 33561137

The task dependent differences in electromyography activity of hamstring muscles during leg curls and hip extensions.

Norikazu Hirose1, Yoshinori Kagaya2, Masaaki Tsuruike3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the influence of the task type on the relative electromyography (EMG) activity of biceps femoris long head (BFlh) to semitendinosus (ST) muscles, and of proximal to distal regions during isometric leg-curl (LC) and hip-extension (HE). Twenty male volunteers performed isometric LC with the knee flexed to 30° (LC30) and 90° (LC90), as well as isometric HE with the knee extended (HE0) and flexed to 90° (HE90), at 40% and 100% maximal voluntary contraction (MVIC). Hip position was neutral in all conditions. EMG activity was recorded from the proximal and distal region of the BFlh and ST muscles. BFlh/ST was calculated from the raw root-mean-square (RMS) amplitudes. The RMS of 40% MVIC was normalized using MVIC data and the proximal/distal (P/D) ratio of normalized EMG (NEMG) was calculated. The BFlh/ST ratio was higher in HE0 than in LC90 during MVIC and 40% MVIC (p<0.05), and was higher in HE90 than in LC90 (p<0.05) during 40% MVIC at the proximal region, whereas no difference was observed between HE0 and LC30. There was no inter-task difference in BFlh/ST ratio in the distal region. Furthermore, the P/D ratio was higher in LC90 than in LC30 and HE0 (p<0.05) in BFlh and ST muscles, and was higher in HE90 than in LC30 and HE0 (p<0.05) in BFlh during 40% MVIC. However, there was no difference in P/D ratio between LC30 and LC90, and HE0 and HE90. This showed that there was no task-dependent difference in the EMG activity of the BFlh muscle relative to the ST muscle between prone hip extension and prone knee flexion when the knee joint was set at an equivalent angle. Similarly, there was no task-dependent difference in the NEMG of the proximal region relative to the distal region in BFlh and ST muscles during 40% MVIC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33561137      PMCID: PMC7872291          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  36 in total

1.  Effect of joint angle on EMG variables in leg and thigh muscles.

Authors:  D Farina; R Merletti; M Nazzaro; I Caruso
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

2.  Muscle architecture variations along the human semitendinosus and biceps femoris (long head) length.

Authors:  Eleftherios Kellis; Nikiforos Galanis; Konstantinos Natsis; George Kapetanos
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Precise localization of the motor nerve branches to the hamstring muscles: an aid to the conduct of neurolytic procedures.

Authors:  P M Seidel; G K Seidel; B M Gans; M Dijkers
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  High-density electromyography activity in various hamstring exercises.

Authors:  András Hegyi; Dániel Csala; Annamária Péter; Taija Finni; Neil J Cronin
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Differences in the Electromyographic Activity of the Hamstring, Gluteus Maximus, and Erector Spinae Muscles in a Variety of Kinetic Changes.

Authors:  Norikazu Hirose; Masaaki Tsuruike
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Impact of the Nordic hamstring and hip extension exercises on hamstring architecture and morphology: implications for injury prevention.

Authors:  Matthew N Bourne; Steven J Duhig; Ryan G Timmins; Morgan D Williams; David A Opar; Aiman Al Najjar; Graham K Kerr; Anthony J Shield
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Muscle architecture of the human lower limb.

Authors:  T L Wickiewicz; R R Roy; P L Powell; V R Edgerton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Prophylaxis and management of hamstring muscle injuries in intercollegiate football players.

Authors:  T M Heiser; J Weber; G Sullivan; P Clare; R R Jacobs
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Evaluation of the hamstring muscle complex following acute injury.

Authors:  George Koulouris; David Connell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Injury incidence and injury patterns in professional football: the UEFA injury study.

Authors:  J Ekstrand; M Hägglund; M Waldén
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.