Literature DB >> 30102684

Differences in the Electromyographic Activity of the Hamstring, Gluteus Maximus, and Erector Spinae Muscles in a Variety of Kinetic Changes.

Norikazu Hirose1, Masaaki Tsuruike2.   

Abstract

Hirose, N and Tsuruike, M. Differences in the electromyographic activity of the hamstring, gluteus maximus, and erector spinae muscles in a variety of kinetic changes. J Strength Cond Res 32(12): 3366-3372, 2018-This study aimed to clarify the differences in the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the semitendinosus (ST), semimembranosus (SM), biceps femoris long head (BFl), gluteus maximus (GM), and erector spinae (ES) muscles during leg curl and bridge exercises across different knee angles and isometric contraction outputs. Sixteen male volunteers participated in this study. The EMG of all targeted muscles was measured at 20 and 40% of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in the leg curl and during bilateral and unilateral bridge exercises. The knee flexion angle was randomly set at 30, 60, 90, and 120° during each of the exercises. The obtained data were normalized by the MVIC of the corresponding muscle, and each of the normalized values was compared with that of the ST. The EMG activity of the ST was significantly greater at 120° of knee flexion than that of 30 and 60° of knee flexion during leg curl regardless of intensity (p < 0.05), in contrast with that of the SM and BFl. However, bridge exercises diminished this inverse relationship. The ES activity changed similarly to that of the hamstrings, and no difference was observed in the activity of the GM regardless of different knee angles during bridge exercise(s). The strength and conditioning professionals should alter the knee joint angle and load during bridge and leg curl exercises according to which hamstring muscle they want to strengthen because ST, SM, and BFl EMG activity varies depending on the intensity and knee angles during these exercises.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30102684     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  Influence of Altered Knee Angle and Muscular Contraction Type on Electromyographic Activity of Hamstring Muscles during 45° Hip Extension Exercise.

Authors:  Taspol Keerasomboon; Shinshiro Mineta; Norikazu Hirose
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Effects of Knee Flexion Angles on the Joint Force and Muscle Force during Bridging Exercise: A Musculoskeletal Model Simulation.

Authors:  Yasufumi Takeshita; Masayuki Kawada; Takasuke Miyazaki; Yuki Nakai; Sota Araki; Shintaro Nakatsuji; Yuta Matsuzawa; Shobu Nakashima; Ryoji Kiyama
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 3.822

3.  The task dependent differences in electromyography activity of hamstring muscles during leg curls and hip extensions.

Authors:  Norikazu Hirose; Yoshinori Kagaya; Masaaki Tsuruike
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of a wearable device and functional wear on spinal alignment and jump performance.

Authors:  Hayato Ikeda; Takayuki Miyamori; Junji Katsuhira; Ryuichi Sawa; Yu Shimasaki; Yuji Takazawa; Masafumi Yoshimura
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.103

5.  Influence of Altered Knee Angle on Electromyographic Activity of Hamstring Muscles Between Nordic Hamstring Exercise and Nordic Hamstring Exercise with Incline Slope Lower Leg Board.

Authors:  Taspol Keerasomboon; Toshiaki Soga; Norikazu Hirose
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-08-01

Review 6.  Hamstrings force-length relationships and their implications for angle-specific joint torques: a narrative review.

Authors:  Eleftherios Kellis; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-05

Review 7.  The Hamstrings: Anatomic and Physiologic Variations and Their Potential Relationships With Injury Risk.

Authors:  José Afonso; Sílvia Rocha-Rodrigues; Filipe M Clemente; Michele Aquino; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Hugo Sarmento; Alberto Fílter; Jesús Olivares-Jabalera; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.