Literature DB >> 33560253

Does Capacitively Coupled Electric Fields Stimulation Improve Clinical Outcomes After Instrumented Spinal Fusion? A Multicentered Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Leo Massari1, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano2, Stefania Setti3, Gaetano Caruso1, Enrico Gallazzi4, Simona Salati3, Marco Brayda-Bruno4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) is used to treat lumbar degenerative disorders. Methods to improve the functional recovery of patients undergoing LSF is one of the main goals in daily clinical practice. The objective of this study is to assess whether biophysical stimulation with capacitively coupled electric fields (CCEF) can be used as adjuvant therapy to enhance clinical outcome in LSF-treated patients.
METHODS: Forty-two patients undergoing LSF were assessed and randomly allocated to either the active or to the placebo group. Follow-up visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery; long-term follow-up was performed at year 10. Visual analogue scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire were recorded.
RESULTS: This study demonstrates a significant improvement in CCEF-treated patients at 6 and 12 months' follow-up for SF-36, and at 12 months' follow-up for ODI values. Based on SF-36 and ODI scores, we reported a significantly higher percentage of successful treatments at 12 months in the active compared with the placebo group. Moreover, in a subset of patients at 10 years' follow-up, a significant difference was reported in VAS and ODI scores between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that 3 months of CCEF treatment immediately after surgery is effective in reducing ODI and improving SF-36 score, and that these benefits can be maintained up to 12 months. In a subset of patients, these positive outcomes are retained up to 10 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that CCEF stimulation can be used as an adjunct to LSF for spine diseases, for increasing overall quality of life and improving patients' functional recovery. CCEF is safe and well tolerated, compatible with activities of daily living. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2020 ISASS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  capacitively coupled electric fields; chronic back pain; level I; quality of life; randomized prospective placebo-controlled trial; spinal fusion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33560253      PMCID: PMC7872405          DOI: 10.14444/7142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  25 in total

1.  The use of revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Spine fusion for discogenic low back pain: outcomes in patients treated with or without pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation.

Authors:  R A Marks
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation therapies for spinal fusions: current concepts.

Authors:  Jean C Gan; Paul A Glazer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of spinal fusion and nonoperative treatment in patients with chronic low back pain: long-term follow-up of three randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Jens Ivar Brox; Jeremy C T Fairbank
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  A double-blind study of capacitively coupled electrical stimulation as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusions.

Authors:  C B Goodwin; C T Brighton; R D Guyer; J R Johnson; K I Light; H A Yuan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Treatment of failed posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) of the spine with pulsing electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  J W Simmons
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Capacitively coupled electric field for pain relief in patients with vertebral fractures and chronic pain.

Authors:  Maurizio Rossini; Ombretta Viapiana; Davide Gatti; Francesca de Terlizzi; Silvano Adami
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Emily A Blood; Anna N A Tosteson; Nancy Birkmeyer; Harry Herkowitz; Michael Longley; Lawrence Lenke; Sanford Emery; Serena S Hu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker; Samra Mian; Tetyana Kendzerska; Melissa French
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Biophysical stimulation of bone and cartilage: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Leo Massari; Franco Benazzo; Francesco Falez; Dario Perugia; Luca Pietrogrande; Stefania Setti; Raffaella Osti; Enrico Vaienti; Carlo Ruosi; Ruggero Cadossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Affects the Development of Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women with Vertebral Fractures.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Xiao Jin; Zhiqiang Guan; Qiyun Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.