Robert S Rudin1, Sofia Perez2, Jorge A Rodriguez2,3, Jessica Sousa1, Savanna Plombon2, Adriana Arcia4, Dinah Foer3,5, David W Bates2,3, Anuj K Dalal2,3. 1. Health Care Division, RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. School of Nursing, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, USA. 5. Division of General Internal Medicine and Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine user and electronic health records (EHR) integration requirements for a scalable remote symptom monitoring intervention for asthma patients and their providers. METHODS: Guided by the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, we conducted a user-centered design process involving English- and Spanish-speaking patients and providers affiliated with an academic medical center. We conducted a secondary analysis of interview transcripts from our prior study, new design sessions with patients and primary care providers (PCPs), and a survey of PCPs. We determined EHR integration requirements as part of the asthma app design and development process. RESULTS: Analysis of 26 transcripts (21 patients, 5 providers) from the prior study, 21 new design sessions (15 patients, 6 providers), and survey responses from 55 PCPs (71% of 78) identified requirements. Patient-facing requirements included: 1- or 5-item symptom questionnaires each week, depending on asthma control; option to request a callback; ability to enter notes, triggers, and peak flows; and tips pushed via the app prior to a clinic visit. PCP-facing requirements included a clinician-facing dashboard accessible from the EHR and an EHR inbox message preceding the visit. PCP preferences diverged regarding graphical presentations of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Nurse-facing requirements included callback requests sent as an EHR inbox message. Requirements were consistent for English- and Spanish-speaking patients. EHR integration required use of custom application programming interfaces (APIs). CONCLUSION: Using the NASSS framework to guide our user-centered design process, we identified patient and provider requirements for scaling an EHR-integrated remote symptom monitoring intervention in primary care. These requirements met the needs of patients and providers. Additional standards for PRO displays and EHR inbox APIs are needed to facilitate spread.
OBJECTIVE: To determine user and electronic health records (EHR) integration requirements for a scalable remote symptom monitoring intervention for asthma patients and their providers. METHODS: Guided by the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, we conducted a user-centered design process involving English- and Spanish-speaking patients and providers affiliated with an academic medical center. We conducted a secondary analysis of interview transcripts from our prior study, new design sessions with patients and primary care providers (PCPs), and a survey of PCPs. We determined EHR integration requirements as part of the asthma app design and development process. RESULTS: Analysis of 26 transcripts (21 patients, 5 providers) from the prior study, 21 new design sessions (15 patients, 6 providers), and survey responses from 55 PCPs (71% of 78) identified requirements. Patient-facing requirements included: 1- or 5-item symptom questionnaires each week, depending on asthma control; option to request a callback; ability to enter notes, triggers, and peak flows; and tips pushed via the app prior to a clinic visit. PCP-facing requirements included a clinician-facing dashboard accessible from the EHR and an EHR inbox message preceding the visit. PCP preferences diverged regarding graphical presentations of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Nurse-facing requirements included callback requests sent as an EHR inbox message. Requirements were consistent for English- and Spanish-speaking patients. EHR integration required use of custom application programming interfaces (APIs). CONCLUSION: Using the NASSS framework to guide our user-centered design process, we identified patient and provider requirements for scaling an EHR-integrated remote symptom monitoring intervention in primary care. These requirements met the needs of patients and providers. Additional standards for PRO displays and EHR inbox APIs are needed to facilitate spread.
Authors: Jeremy J Michel; Stephanie Mayne; Robert W Grundmeier; James P Guevara; Nathan J Blum; Thomas J Power; Emily Coffin; Jeffrey M Miller; Alexander G Fiks Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Juan P Wisnivesky; Jessica Lorenzo; Richard Lyn-Cook; Thomas Newman; Adam Aponte; Elizabeth Kiefer; Ethan A Halm Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Adam J Rose; Elizabeth Bayliss; Wenjing Huang; Lesley Baseman; Emily Butcher; Rosa-Elena García; Maria Orlando Edelen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: William J Gordon; Daniel Henderson; Avital DeSharone; Herrick N Fisher; Jessica Judge; David M Levine; Laura MacLean; Diane Sousa; Mack Y Su; Robert Boxer Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Anuj K Dalal; Nicholas Piniella; Theresa E Fuller; Denise Pong; Michael Pardo; Nathaniel Bessa; Catherine Yoon; Stuart Lipsitz; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Elizabeth D Cox; Sarah K Dobrozsi; Christopher B Forrest; Wendy E Gerhardt; Harald Kliems; Bryce B Reeve; Nan E Rothrock; Jin-Shei Lai; Jacob M Svenson; Lindsay A Thompson; Thuy Dan N Tran; Carole A Tucker Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Prashila Dullabh; Shana F Sandberg; Krysta Heaney-Huls; Lauren S Hovey; David F Lobach; Aziz Boxwala; Priyanka J Desai; Elise Berliner; Chris Dymek; Michael I Harrison; James Swiger; Dean F Sittig Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 7.942