Literature DB >> 33557910

Preliminary proposal: a classification system for reconstruction with autologous femoral head after periacetabular tumors resection.

Chunzhi Yi1, Jiaqian Zheng2, Ruoyu Li1,2, Yun Lan1, Mincong He1, Jieqing Lai2, Tianan Guan1, Fengxiang Pang2, Zongquan Mo2, Peng Chen1, Yue Li1, Nannan Zhou2, Xingfu Yang2, Bin Fang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although researchers have adopted various methods for the resection and reconstruction of periacetabular tumors, the total incidence rate of complications remains high. Aiming for preserving the acetabulum and reducing the risk of complications, we applied a surgery method using tumor-free autologous femoral head to reconstruct the defective acetabulum after resection of periacetabular tumors followed by performing a conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA). Moreover, we proposed a preliminary classification system for these surgery methods.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 6 patients treated with acetabulum reconstruction combined with autologous femoral head following peri-acetabulum resection between April 2010 and May 2018. All patients were diagnosed as periacetabular tumors including chondrosarcoma (n = 5) and chondroblastoma (n = 1). Clinical data such as age, diagnosis, complications, local recurrence or metastasis, and function (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 1993, MSTS93) were documented. The average time of follow-up was 62.5 months (range, 17 to 106 months).
RESULTS: A total of 5 patients survive with average MSTS93 score of 27.8 points (range, 26-30). One patient, suffering from multiple bone metastasis prior treatment, ended up dying. One who had received radiotherapy before surgery had poor incision healing. Further, a classification system was preliminary proposed in 2 patients involving the pubis (type A) and 4 patients involving ischium (type B).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, we preliminary proposed a classification system for reconstruction with autologous femoral head after periacetabular low malignant tumors resection. The clinical results suggested that surgery methods involving pubis (type A) and ischium (Type B) are safe and feasible. However, further researches should be conducted to verify our classification system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabulum reconstruction; Autologous femoral head; Periacetabular tumors; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33557910      PMCID: PMC7869519          DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02275-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  44 in total

1.  The role of surgical margins in treatment of Ewing's sarcoma family tumors: experience of a single institution with 512 patients treated with adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Gaetano Bacci; Alessandra Longhi; Antonio Briccoli; Franco Bertoni; Michela Versari; Piero Picci
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Surgical technique: Porous tantalum reconstruction for destructive nonprimary periacetabular tumors.

Authors:  Fazel A Khan; Peter S Rose; Michiro Yanagisawa; David G Lewallen; Franklin H Sim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Reconstruction of advanced periacetabular metastatic lesions with modified Harrington procedure.

Authors:  Bülent Erol; Ahmet Nadir Aydemir; Tolga Onay; Mert Osman Topkar
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  Partial epiphyseal preservation and intercalary allograft reconstruction in high-grade metaphyseal osteosarcoma of the knee.

Authors:  D Luis Muscolo; Miguel A Ayerza; Luis A Aponte-Tinao; Maximiliano Ranalletta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty With Retrograde Ischioacetabular Steinmann Pin Reconstruction for Periacetabular Metastatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Santiago A Lozano-Calderon; Courtney L Kaiser; Polina M Osler; Kevin A Raskin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Chondroblastoma.

Authors:  R E Turcotte; A M Kurt; F H Sim; K K Unni; R A McLeod
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 8.  The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  Hans Gelderblom; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Sander D Dijkstra; Carla S van Rijswijk; Augustinus D Krol; Antonie H M Taminiau; Judith V M G Bovée
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-03

9.  Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone.

Authors:  W F Enneking; W K Dunham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review.

Authors:  T S Brown; C G Salib; P S Rose; F H Sim; D G Lewallen; M P Abdel
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical application of 3D-printed patient-specific guide plate combined with computer navigation in acetabular reconstruction following resection of periacetabular tumors.

Authors:  Jingyi Dang; Jun Fu; Dong Liu; Zhao Zhang; Zhenzhou Mi; Debin Cheng; Xincheng Liu; Yushen Zhang; Dongze Zhu; Lei Wang; Yubo Shi; Hongbin Fan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-01

2.  Periacetabular Tumour Resection under Anterosuperior Iliac Spine Allows Better Alloprosthetic Reconstruction than Above: Bone Contact Matters.

Authors:  Alessandro Bruschi; Luca Cevolani; Benedetta Spazzoli; Marco Focaccia; Stefano Pasini; Tommaso Frisoni; Davide Maria Donati
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.