Keith M Bayless1,2,3, Michelle D Trautwein4, Karen Meusemann5,6,7, Seunggwan Shin8,9, Malte Petersen10, Alexander Donath6, Lars Podsiadlowski6, Christoph Mayer6, Oliver Niehuis7, Ralph S Peters11, Rudolf Meier12,13, Sujatha Narayanan Kutty12,14, Shanlin Liu15, Xin Zhou15, Bernhard Misof16, David K Yeates5, Brian M Wiegmann8. 1. Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO National Research Collections Australia (NRCA), Acton, Canberra, ACT, Australia. keith.bayless@csiro.au. 2. Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA. keith.bayless@csiro.au. 3. Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. keith.bayless@csiro.au. 4. Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA. 5. Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO National Research Collections Australia (NRCA), Acton, Canberra, ACT, Australia. 6. Centre for Molecular Biodiversity Research (ZMB), Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Bonn, Germany. 7. Department of Evolutionary Biology & Ecology, Institute of Biology I, Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg, Hauptstraße 1, Freiburg i. Br., Germany. 8. Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. 9. School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 10. Max-Planck-Institut of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany. 11. Centre of Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany. 12. Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 13. Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 14. Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 15. Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China. 16. Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Bonn, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The most species-rich radiation of animal life in the 66 million years following the Cretaceous extinction event is that of schizophoran flies: a third of fly diversity including Drosophila fruit fly model organisms, house flies, forensic blow flies, agricultural pest flies, and many other well and poorly known true flies. Rapid diversification has hindered previous attempts to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships among major schizophoran clades. A robust phylogenetic hypothesis for the major lineages containing these 55,000 described species would be critical to understand the processes that contributed to the diversity of these flies. We use protein encoding sequence data from transcriptomes, including 3145 genes from 70 species, representing all superfamilies, to improve the resolution of this previously intractable phylogenetic challenge. RESULTS: Our results support a paraphyletic acalyptrate grade including a monophyletic Calyptratae and the monophyly of half of the acalyptrate superfamilies. The primary branching framework of Schizophora is well supported for the first time, revealing the primarily parasitic Pipunculidae and Sciomyzoidea stat. rev. as successive sister groups to the remaining Schizophora. Ephydroidea, Drosophila's superfamily, is the sister group of Calyptratae. Sphaeroceroidea has modest support as the sister to all non-sciomyzoid Schizophora. We define two novel lineages corroborated by morphological traits, the 'Modified Oviscapt Clade' containing Tephritoidea, Nerioidea, and other families, and the 'Cleft Pedicel Clade' containing Calyptratae, Ephydroidea, and other families. Support values remain low among a challenging subset of lineages, including Diopsidae. The placement of these families remained uncertain in both concatenated maximum likelihood and multispecies coalescent approaches. Rogue taxon removal was effective in increasing support values compared with strategies that maximise gene coverage or minimise missing data. CONCLUSIONS: Dividing most acalyptrate fly groups into four major lineages is supported consistently across analyses. Understanding the fundamental branching patterns of schizophoran flies provides a foundation for future comparative research on the genetics, ecology, and biocontrol.
BACKGROUND: The most species-rich radiation of animal life in the 66 million years following the Cretaceous extinction event is that of schizophoran flies: a third of fly diversity including Drosophilafruit fly model organisms, house flies, forensic blow flies, agricultural pest flies, and many other well and poorly known true flies. Rapid diversification has hindered previous attempts to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships among major schizophoran clades. A robust phylogenetic hypothesis for the major lineages containing these 55,000 described species would be critical to understand the processes that contributed to the diversity of these flies. We use protein encoding sequence data from transcriptomes, including 3145 genes from 70 species, representing all superfamilies, to improve the resolution of this previously intractable phylogenetic challenge. RESULTS: Our results support a paraphyletic acalyptrate grade including a monophyletic Calyptratae and the monophyly of half of the acalyptrate superfamilies. The primary branching framework of Schizophora is well supported for the first time, revealing the primarily parasitic Pipunculidae and Sciomyzoidea stat. rev. as successive sister groups to the remaining Schizophora. Ephydroidea, Drosophila's superfamily, is the sister group of Calyptratae. Sphaeroceroidea has modest support as the sister to all non-sciomyzoid Schizophora. We define two novel lineages corroborated by morphological traits, the 'Modified Oviscapt Clade' containing Tephritoidea, Nerioidea, and other families, and the 'Cleft Pedicel Clade' containing Calyptratae, Ephydroidea, and other families. Support values remain low among a challenging subset of lineages, including Diopsidae. The placement of these families remained uncertain in both concatenated maximum likelihood and multispecies coalescent approaches. Rogue taxon removal was effective in increasing support values compared with strategies that maximise gene coverage or minimise missing data. CONCLUSIONS: Dividing most acalyptrate fly groups into four major lineages is supported consistently across analyses. Understanding the fundamental branching patterns of schizophoran flies provides a foundation for future comparative research on the genetics, ecology, and biocontrol.
Authors: Jes Rust; Hukam Singh; Rajendra S Rana; Tom McCann; Lacham Singh; Ken Anderson; Nivedita Sarkar; Paul C Nascimbene; Frauke Stebner; Jennifer C Thomas; Monica Solórzano Kraemer; Christopher J Williams; Michael S Engel; Ashok Sahni; David Grimaldi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ralph S Peters; Oliver Niehuis; Simon Gunkel; Marcel Bläser; Christoph Mayer; Lars Podsiadlowski; Alexey Kozlov; Alexander Donath; Simon van Noort; Shanlin Liu; Xin Zhou; Bernhard Misof; John Heraty; Lars Krogmann Journal: Mol Phylogenet Evol Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: Andrew N Bubak; Michael J Watt; Jazmine D W Yaeger; Kenneth J Renner; John G Swallow Journal: J Exp Biol Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 3.312
Authors: Evgenia V Kriventseva; Fredrik Tegenfeldt; Tom J Petty; Robert M Waterhouse; Felipe A Simão; Igor A Pozdnyakov; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgeny M Zdobnov Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Rodolphe Poupardin; Konrad Schöttner; Jaroslava Korbelová; Jan Provazník; David Doležel; Dinko Pavlinic; Vladimír Beneš; Vladimír Koštál Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Isaac S Winkler; Ashley H Kirk-Spriggs; Keith M Bayless; John Soghigian; Rudolf Meier; Thomas Pape; David K Yeates; A Bernardo Carvalho; Robert S Copeland; Brian M Wiegmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 3.752