Literature DB >> 3355641

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

J Gillquist1, M Odensten.   

Abstract

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament was compared with reconstruction through a miniarthrotomy. The operation time was significantly longer with arthroscopy, but the Lysholm scores and activity levels were the same in both groups before and 1 year after the operation. There was no difference in quadriceps torque between the groups before surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The measured stability in 20 degrees of knee flexion was similar in both groups before, immediately after, and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. A slow increase in the laxity was noted. One of 20 ligaments ruptured in the arthrotomy group due to a new trauma. In the arthroscopy group, there was one rupture due to abrasion. During the follow-up, two cases in the arthroscopy group had synovitis, in one case leading to removal of the prosthesis. There seems to be no major benefit from arthroscopic reconstruction in terms of rehabilitation. The miniarthrotomy is preferred since the notch plasty is easier to perform adequately during it than during arthroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3355641     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(88)80003-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  9 in total

1.  The effect of fixation technique on graft position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  A Amendola; M Menon; M Clatworthy; P J Fowler
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Alejandro I Marcano; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Ramon Cugat; Kevin W Farmer; Michael W Moser
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-10

3.  [Not Available].

Authors:  P Lobenhoffer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Arthroscopic-assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  R A Marder
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-08

5.  Effect of pretension in reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament with a Dacron prosthesis. A retrospective study.

Authors:  R J van Heerwaarden; D Stellinga; A J Frudiger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Five-year results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Stryker Dacron high-strength ligament.

Authors:  T Wredmark; B Engström
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [Replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament by a PET prosthesis (Trevira extra-strength) as a salvage procedure in chronically unstable previously operated knee joints. Intermediate to long-term results of a clinical study].

Authors:  R Letsch; K M Stürmer; H J Kock; H Wissing; K P Schmit-Neuerburg
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1994-12

8.  Donor-site morbidity after harvest of a bone-tendon-bone patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  D Kohn; A Sander-Beuermann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Transtibial technique versus two incisions in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: tunnel positioning, isometricity and functional evaluation.

Authors:  Ricardo Hideki Yanasse; Alisson Amoroso Lima; Rodrigo Silveira Antoniassi; Danilo Abu Ezzedin; Marcos Henrique Ferreira Laraya; Roberto Ryuiti Mizobuchi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-04-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.