Literature DB >> 14575246

The effect of fixation technique on graft position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

A Amendola1, M Menon, M Clatworthy, P J Fowler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to determine the extent to which the technique used in ACL reconstruction and fixation influences graft placement. This is a Comparative Radiographic cohort study. Precise graft placement is one of the most crucial components of a successful anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Two commonly used techniques of ACL reconstruction are arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone (B-PT-B) autograft with interference screw fixation and semi-tendinosus and gracilis (ST + G) tendon autograft with endobutton femoral and multiple staple belt buckle tibial fixation. Using radiographic measurements of bone tunnel position following ACL reconstruction this study quantified the extent to which these techniques influenced graft placement. Femoral and tibial tunnel position in ACL reconstruction was determined using the post-operative radiographs of 40 male patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction (20 B-PT-B and 20 ST + G). The primary outcome measure was location of bone tunnel position following ACL reconstruction. Measurements were based on the guidelines of Amis et al. Femoral tunnel position of B-PT-B grafts was an average of 9.36% more anterior in the sagittal plane than with ST + G grafts. The mean position of B-PT-B grafts was at 31.11% (SD = 5.45%). The mean position of the ST + G grafts was 21.76% (SD = 6.62%). This difference between the two was found to be significant (p < .001). As demonstrated by this study, placement and orientation may vary to accommodate technique and fixation. Clinical outcomes measured were similar in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14575246      PMCID: PMC1888394     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  26 in total

1.  Radiographic evaluation of native anterior cruciate ligament attachments and graft placement for reconstruction. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  D M Lintner; S E Dewitt; J B Moseley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  M D Peyrache; P Djian; P Christel; J Witvoet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Proceedings of the ESSKA Scientific Workshop on Reconstruction of the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments.

Authors:  A A Amis; B Beynnon; L Blankevoort; P Chambat; P Christel; L Durselen; N Friederich; E Grood; P Hertel; R Jakob
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Roofplasty requirements in vitro for different tibial hole placements in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  G S Berns; S M Howell
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: modified technique and radiographic review.

Authors:  J B O'Donnell; T A Scerpella
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof.

Authors:  S M Howell; M A Taylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  N Mohtadi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Sagittal knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a patellar tendon strip. A two-year follow-up study.

Authors:  L Good; M Odensten; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Graft failure in intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Vergis; J Gillquist
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  E E Khalfayan; P F Sharkey; A H Alexander; J D Bruckner; E B Bynum
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  3 in total

1.  Radiological evaluation for conflict of the femoral tunnel entrance area prior to anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery.

Authors:  Philippe M Tscholl; Roland M Biedert; Imre Gal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Intraoperative fracture of patellar bone plug during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone: clinical case.

Authors:  Andrea Emilio Salvi; Giovanni Pietro Metelli; Giovanni Musella
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Radiological evaluation of tunnel position in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the Indian population and their clinical correlation.

Authors:  Anindya Debnath; Rajeev Raman; Paras Kumar Banka; Sanjay Kumar; Hirak Debnath
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-10-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.