Literature DB >> 33556130

Optimal two-stage design of single arm Phase II clinical trials based on median event time test.

Yeonhee Park1.   

Abstract

The Phase II clinical trials aim to assess the therapeutic efficacy of a new drug. The therapeutic efficacy has been often quantified by response rate such as overall response rate or survival probability in the Phase II setting. However, there is a strong desire to use survival time, which is the gold standard endpoint for the confirmatory Phase III study, when investigators set the primary objective of the Phase II study and test hypotheses based on the median survivals. We propose a method for median event time test to provide the sample size calculation and decision rule of testing. The decision rule is simple and straightforward in that it compares the observed median event time to the identified threshold. Moreover, it is extended to optimal two-stage design for practice, which extends the idea of Simon's optimal two-stage design for survival endpoint. We investigate the performance of the proposed methods through simulation studies. The proposed methods are applied to redesign a trial based on median event time for trial illustration, and practical strategies are given for application of proposed methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33556130      PMCID: PMC7870013          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  22 in total

Review 1.  Comparing survival of a sample to that of a standard population.

Authors:  Dianne M Finkelstein; Alona Muzikansky; David A Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Adjusting Simon's optimal two-stage design for heterogeneous populations based on stratification or using historical controls.

Authors:  Dominic Edelmann; Christina Habermehl; Richard F Schlenk; Axel Benner
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

4.  Study design of single-arm phase II immunotherapy trials with long-term survivors and random delayed treatment effect.

Authors:  Chenghao Chu; Shufang Liu; Alan Rong
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 1.894

5.  Phase II cancer clinical trials with a one-sample log-rank test and its corrections based on the Edgeworth expansion.

Authors:  Xiaoqun Sun; Paul Peng; Dongsheng Tu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Ruitao Lin; Daniel Li; Lei Nie; Katherine E Warren
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Two-stage designs optimal under the alternative hypothesis for phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  A P Mander; S G Thompson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Two-stage phase II survival trial design.

Authors:  Jianrong Wu; Li Chen; Jing Wei; Heidi Weiss; Aman Chauhan
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 1.234

9.  Two-stage optimal designs with survival endpoint when the follow-up time is restricted.

Authors:  Guogen Shan; Hua Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Modified Simon's minimax and optimal two-stage designs for single-arm phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Jongphil Kim; Michael J Schell
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-07-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Adapting Simon's Two-Stage Design for Efficient Screening of Filovirus Vaccines in Non-Human Primates.

Authors:  Nancy A Niemuth; Carol L Sabourin; Lucy A Ward
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.