Azadeh Sharafi1, Katherine Medina1, Marcelo W V Zibetti1, Smita Rao2, Martijn A Cloos3, Ryan Brown1,4,5, Ravinder R Regatte1,4,5. 1. Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, New York University, New York, New York, USA. 3. Center of Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 4. Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 5. Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a novel MR-fingerprinting (MRF) pulse sequence that is insensitive to B 1 + and B0 imperfections for simultaneous T1 , T2 , and T1ρ relaxation mapping. METHODS: We implemented a totally balanced spin-lock (TB-SL) module to encode T1ρ relaxation into an existing MRF framework that encoded T1 and T2 . The spin-lock module used two 180° pulses with compensatory phases to reduce T1ρ sensitivity to B1 and B0 inhomogeneities. We compared T1ρ measured using TB-SL MRF in Bloch simulations, model agar phantoms, and in vivo experiments to those with a self-compensated spin-lock preparation module (SC-SL). The TB-SL MRF repeatability was evaluated in maps acquired in the lower leg skeletal muscle of 12 diabetic peripheral neuropathy patients, scanned two times each during visits separated by about 30 days. RESULTS: The phantom relaxation times measured with TB-SL and SC-SL MRF were in good agreement with reference values in regions with low B1 inhomogeneities. Compared with SC-SL, TB-SL MRF showed in experiments greater robustness against severe B1 inhomogeneities and in Bloch simulations greater robustness against B1 and B0 . We measured with TB-SL MRF an average T1 = 950.1 ± 28.7 ms, T2 = 26.0 ± 1.2 ms, and T1ρ = 31.7 ± 3.2 ms in skeletal muscle across patients. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated low bias between TB-SL and SC-SL MRF and between TB-SL MRF maps acquired in two visits. The coefficient of variation was less than 3% for all measurements. CONCLUSION: The proposed TB-SL MRF sequence is fast and insensitive to B 1 + and B0 imperfections. It can simultaneously map T1 , T2 , T1ρ , and B 1 + in a single scan and can potentially be used to study muscle composition.
PURPOSE: To develop a novel MR-fingerprinting (MRF) pulse sequence that is insensitive to B 1 + and B0 imperfections for simultaneous T1 , T2 , and T1ρ relaxation mapping. METHODS: We implemented a totally balanced spin-lock (TB-SL) module to encode T1ρ relaxation into an existing MRF framework that encoded T1 and T2 . The spin-lock module used two 180° pulses with compensatory phases to reduce T1ρ sensitivity to B1 and B0 inhomogeneities. We compared T1ρ measured using TB-SL MRF in Bloch simulations, model agar phantoms, and in vivo experiments to those with a self-compensated spin-lock preparation module (SC-SL). The TB-SL MRF repeatability was evaluated in maps acquired in the lower leg skeletal muscle of 12 diabetic peripheral neuropathy patients, scanned two times each during visits separated by about 30 days. RESULTS: The phantom relaxation times measured with TB-SL and SC-SL MRF were in good agreement with reference values in regions with low B1 inhomogeneities. Compared with SC-SL, TB-SL MRF showed in experiments greater robustness against severe B1 inhomogeneities and in Bloch simulations greater robustness against B1 and B0 . We measured with TB-SL MRF an average T1 = 950.1 ± 28.7 ms, T2 = 26.0 ± 1.2 ms, and T1ρ = 31.7 ± 3.2 ms in skeletal muscle across patients. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated low bias between TB-SL and SC-SL MRF and between TB-SL MRF maps acquired in two visits. The coefficient of variation was less than 3% for all measurements. CONCLUSION: The proposed TB-SL MRF sequence is fast and insensitive to B 1 + and B0 imperfections. It can simultaneously map T1 , T2 , T1ρ , and B 1 + in a single scan and can potentially be used to study muscle composition.
Authors: Vivek Kalia; Doris G Leung; Darryl B Sneag; Filippo Del Grande; John A Carrino Journal: Semin Musculoskelet Radiol Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 1.777
Authors: Jakob Assländer; Martijn A Cloos; Florian Knoll; Daniel K Sodickson; Jürgen Hennig; Riccardo Lattanzi Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-03-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hee Kyung Kim; Diana M Lindquist; Suraj D Serai; Yogesh K Mariappan; Lily L Wang; Arnold C Merrow; Kiaran P McGee; Richard L Ehman; Tal Laor Journal: Radiol Clin North Am Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Ryan Brown; Azadeh Sharafi; Jill M Slade; Antonio Convit; Nathan Davis; Steven Baete; Heather Milton; Kenneth J Mroczek; Patricia M Kluding; Ravinder R Regatte; Prodromos Parasoglou; Smita Rao Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2021-09
Authors: Maximilian Gram; Daniel Gensler; Petra Albertova; Fabian Tobias Gutjahr; Kolja Lau; Paula-Anahi Arias-Loza; Peter Michael Jakob; Peter Nordbeck Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 6.903